O/T BBC

Doing a panorama discrediting our SAS ,is it just me or am I the only one that finds this bang out of order ,we don't need Putin and his propoganda these lot are doing the job for him , can I not pay tv license fee ,will I get fined ?

Doing a panorama discrediting our SAS ,is it just me or am I the only one that finds this bang out of order ,we don't need Putin and his propoganda these lot are doing the job for him , can I not pay tv license fee ,will I get fined ?

Absolutely hate the way the bbc is run atm. I’ve made numerous complaints.

I find it so frustrating,how they get away with it

Should the potential multiple murders of unarmed prisoners be ignored just because of someone’s occupation?

If true, those SAS squads could’ve put their fellow soldiers in danger. If rumours were spreading that surrendering peacefully gets you shot in the back why would insurgents choose to surrender over fighting to the death. How many sons and brothers potentially saw their family members killed in cold blood and used that as justification to pick up arms against their family’s murderers?

Is this the same stuff that was done couple years ago? People are determined to give our forces bad press or an excuse to bring charges against them which invariably leads to parasitic
lawers chasing the money and compensation at the taxpayers expense.

If this story was about a foreign army we would, quite rightly, be appalled.

If this story was about a foreign army we would, quite rightly, be appalled.

Yes probably be outraged .... but there again how many countries national broadcaster would run such a story about their own forces? We seem to have a distorted sense of morality against our own forces as this is not 1st time this as happened ... be a lot of people rubbing hands at thought of persuing our armed forces to court.

My biggest concern is how anyone still trusts the BBC after their decades of lies.

You're believing the same organisation who covered up Jimmy Savile for over 30 years.

My biggest concern is how anyone still trusts the BBC after their decades of lies.

You're believing the same organisation who covered up Jimmy Savile for over 30 years.

Turns out several of these stories were reported on and investigated previously now they've uncovered more of same things supposedly .? Think it's called trawling if go through enough things you turn up something that look out of ordinary but in reality nothing like it happened... undoubtedly things went on that could be described as sudpect but when dealing with war lots things are suspect... one labour mp is already saying theres a need for justice so already saying soldiers guilty before start of enquiry begins.

one labour mp is already saying theres a need for justice

God forbid

If this story was about a foreign army we would, quite rightly, be appalled.

Yes probably be outraged .... but there again how many countries national broadcaster would run such a story about their own forces? We seem to have a distorted sense of morality against our own forces as this is not 1st time this as happened ... be a lot of people rubbing hands at thought of persuing our armed forces to court.

So just to confirm, you’d support the coverup of potential war crimes as long as it’s British armed forces committing them?

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

Did you watch any of it mate? Only caught the first part but it seemed to be along the lines of.. Aussies have an enquiry into it and reveal all sorts, then when questioned the Brits were anything but transparent. Head of our special forces received information into wrongdoing but decided not to pass it on etc etc.

If our military are going to try and cover stuff up but the media catch wind of it, it is absolutely their duty to report on it. Anyone saying otherwise needs to have a good think about what they are promoting. Military can do whatever the f**k they want and we shouldn't question it because it impacts our national image? Yet at the same time can have a go at Russia for 'propoganda'

If this story was about a foreign army we would, quite rightly, be appalled.

Yes probably be outraged .... but there again how many countries national broadcaster would run such a story about their own forces? We seem to have a distorted sense of morality against our own forces as this is not 1st time this as happened ... be a lot of people rubbing hands at thought of persuing our armed forces to court.

So just to confirm, you’d support the coverup of potential war crimes as long as it’s British armed forces committing them?

this was put out several years ago and investigated not sufficient evidence to make it stick so why as bbc spent time money and effort to bring up same stuff? As I've said trawl enough paper work and you'll find discrepancies in stories.... no dont I support cover up just making point that you do not get other national broadcaster twice bring up same story about it's own army ...... yes we'll have enquiry at cost of millions to tax payers and the lawyers will get involved chasing the victims families making up evidence like previously did so that they can make money out of things...... already one mp states we should make amends even before anyone is guilty.. anyway take years to investigate so plenty of time to hound soldiers to death like in northern Ireland ....

Doing a panorama discrediting our SAS ,is it just me or am I the only one that finds this bang out of order ,we don't need Putin and his propoganda these lot are doing the job for him , can I not pay tv license fee ,will I get fined ?

Stop paying, Ive not bought one for 20 years and my Telly worl
Is great. Don’t let the clowns who try to enforce it onto your property, if one does knock your door tell him “your implied right of entry has been revoked “ then firmly escort them off your property.

So let me get this right ,you don't have to let them in and there is nothing they can do about it

So let me get this right ,you don't have to let them in and there is nothing they can do about it

They’d need a court order/warrant and a policeman with them to gain entry, they’d have to notify you if they’re doing that. I had one crank stroll into my garden while I’d left the gate open. I said the implied right of entry thing took him by the arm gently and walked him off my land. They’re getting nothing from me.

Hate this holier than tho attitude. Most wouldn’t be able to cope in the situations our armed forces find themselves in during conflicts and I for one am comfortable that they will make the right call. I’ve no interest in any BBC documentary trying to dig up dirt on them.

A labour politician, a BBC TV reporter and a British SAS soldier were captured by ISIS........

They were, as usual, sentenced to death by beheading.
Unexpectedly, the ISIS leader said they could have one last request before their sentence was carried out...
The Labour politician asked to hear a rendering of "Keep the Red Flag Flying Here".
The BBC TV reporter asked that the beheading be on television so that even when she was dead, her face was still on TV.
The British SAS soldier asked to be kicked three times in the arse hard.
As the SAS soldiers request was unusual, ISIS decided to carry his request out first.
As the kick landed, the SAS soldier pulled a hidden 9mm Glock pistol out of his smock, shot three terrorists dead.
He then grabbed one of the fallen terrorists AK47s and shot dead the rest of the terrorists.
The other two prisoners were amazed, and asked why he requested to be kicked three times before he drew his weapon.
"Because" said the soldier "When we get back to the UK. I don't want you ****ing pair of politically correct clowns saying it was an "unprovoked attack".

A labour politician, a BBC TV reporter and a British SAS soldier were captured by ISIS........

They were, as usual, sentenced to death by beheading.
Unexpectedly, the ISIS leader said they could have one last request before their sentence was carried out...
The Labour politician asked to hear a rendering of "Keep the Red Flag Flying Here".
The BBC TV reporter asked that the beheading be on television so that even when she was dead, her face was still on TV.
The British SAS soldier asked to be kicked three times in the arse hard.
As the SAS soldiers request was unusual, ISIS decided to carry his request out first.
As the kick landed, the SAS soldier pulled a hidden 9mm Glock pistol out of his smock, shot three terrorists dead.
He then grabbed one of the fallen terrorists AK47s and shot dead the rest of the terrorists.
The other two prisoners were amazed, and asked why he requested to be kicked three times before he drew his weapon.
"Because" said the soldier "When we get back to the UK. I don't want you ****ing pair of politically correct clowns saying it was an "unprovoked attack".

Funny coz it’s true

No action being taken as the reports are not new but from previous events that were investigated by the police and no wrongdoing uncovered...... but if the bbc can produce new evidence investigation will be looked at.... bbc are deciding if they can reveal anything inline with editorial policy? .....
Whatever that means... sounds like they've got nothing new but wont admit it..

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

Did you watch any of it mate? Only caught the first part but it seemed to be along the lines of.. Aussies have an enquiry into it and reveal all sorts, then when questioned the Brits were anything but transparent. Head of our special forces received information into wrongdoing but decided not to pass it on etc etc.

If our military are going to try and cover stuff up but the media catch wind of it, it is absolutely their duty to report on it. Anyone saying otherwise needs to have a good think about what they are promoting. Military can do whatever the f**k they want and we shouldn't question it because it impacts our national image? Yet at the same time can have a go at Russia for 'propoganda'

While you sit safely in your chair!

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

Did you watch any of it mate? Only caught the first part but it seemed to be along the lines of.. Aussies have an enquiry into it and reveal all sorts, then when questioned the Brits were anything but transparent. Head of our special forces received information into wrongdoing but decided not to pass it on etc etc.

If our military are going to try and cover stuff up but the media catch wind of it, it is absolutely their duty to report on it. Anyone saying otherwise needs to have a good think about what they are promoting. Military can do whatever the f**k they want and we shouldn't question it because it impacts our national image? Yet at the same time can have a go at Russia for 'propoganda'

While you sit safely in your chair!

The police investigated the allegations found no or insufficient evidence to proceed... bbc are rehashing the story by supposedly finding new witnesses who gave uncolaberated evidence to them.... read the bbc and its saying may have ect ect not shred of new evidence put forward by them... yes people reluctant to pass information on but that evidence already known to police..... as they said any new evidence brought forward would be investigated..... we await the lawyers to find victims
To sue mod whilst picking up millions in legal aid payments just like before.. anyway time will tell if bbc can produce "NEW" evidence because all they've done so far is re tell previous stories already in public domain that they ran previously.

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

Did you watch any of it mate? Only caught the first part but it seemed to be along the lines of.. Aussies have an enquiry into it and reveal all sorts, then when questioned the Brits were anything but transparent. Head of our special forces received information into wrongdoing but decided not to pass it on etc etc.

If our military are going to try and cover stuff up but the media catch wind of it, it is absolutely their duty to report on it. Anyone saying otherwise needs to have a good think about what they are promoting. Military can do whatever the f**k they want and we shouldn't question it because it impacts our national image? Yet at the same time can have a go at Russia for 'propoganda'

While you sit safely in your chair!

The police investigated the allegations found no or insufficient evidence to proceed... bbc are rehashing the story by supposedly finding new witnesses who gave uncolaberated evidence to them.... read the bbc and its saying may have ect ect not shred of new evidence put forward by them... yes people reluctant to pass information on but that evidence already known to police..... as they said any new evidence brought forward would be investigated..... we await the lawyers to find victims
To sue mod whilst picking up millions in legal aid payments just like before.. anyway time will tell if bbc can produce "NEW" evidence because all they've done so far is re tell previous stories already in public domain that they ran previously.

Unfortunately our politicians wont protect them!

If anything this is again fuelling hate for the British and will encourage terrorism within the UK. Such matters should be investigated privately. Thank the BBC when another attack happens in the UK.

Did you watch any of it mate? Only caught the first part but it seemed to be along the lines of.. Aussies have an enquiry into it and reveal all sorts, then when questioned the Brits were anything but transparent. Head of our special forces received information into wrongdoing but decided not to pass it on etc etc.

If our military are going to try and cover stuff up but the media catch wind of it, it is absolutely their duty to report on it. Anyone saying otherwise needs to have a good think about what they are promoting. Military can do whatever the f**k they want and we shouldn't question it because it impacts our national image? Yet at the same time can have a go at Russia for 'propoganda'

While you sit safely in your chair!

The police investigated the allegations found no or insufficient evidence to proceed... bbc are rehashing the story by supposedly finding new witnesses who gave uncolaberated evidence to them.... read the bbc and its saying may have ect ect not shred of new evidence put forward by them... yes people reluctant to pass information on but that evidence already known to police..... as they said any new evidence brought forward would be investigated..... we await the lawyers to find victims
To sue mod whilst picking up millions in legal aid payments just like before.. anyway time will tell if bbc can produce "NEW" evidence because all they've done so far is re tell previous stories already in public domain that they ran previously.

Unfortunately our politicians wont protect them!

No already got calls for justice from a labour politician? Yes investigate but not do what did in previous conflicts and hound them to death (literally) all because to scared to stand up for them against people with agendas against UK... it was proved in Iraq conflict evidence was fabricated just to get soldiers prosecuted and compo given... fear that's what will happen again we are such easy touch in this regard compared to other countries.... bbc have no proof just statements that may or may not have foundation or be true ... as they say mud sticks and bbc throwing lots of it to boost their programme.