Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:04 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:17 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:20 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Would make 10m for Murphy look a bit silly.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:23 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:34 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:I could be wrong. But wasn't he at Bolton last season?
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:35 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:40 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:51 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:54 pm
JasonFowler1991 wrote:Another quite unknown player who I know little about. It makes me wonder, and what are other peoples thoughts, do we have an extensive scouting system, good contacts within the game now, or are we adopting a Brentford like approach and using specific data to sign players?
Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:22 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:24 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:32 pm
JasonFowler1991 wrote:Another quite unknown player who I know little about. It makes me wonder, and what are other peoples thoughts, do we have an extensive scouting system, good contacts within the game now, or are we adopting a Brentford like approach and using specific data to sign players?
Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:41 pm
JasonFowler1991 wrote:Another quite unknown player who I know little about. It makes me wonder, and what are other peoples thoughts, do we have an extensive scouting system, good contacts within the game now, or are we adopting a Brentford like approach and using specific data to sign players?
Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:56 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:24 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:28 pm
Barclay1 wrote:Fans saying he didnt set the world alight at Bolton, and couldnt get back into their team once he was fit, doesnt bode well for me.
Should be looking at better IMO
Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:33 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:39 pm
Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:58 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:JasonFowler1991 wrote:Another quite unknown player who I know little about. It makes me wonder, and what are other peoples thoughts, do we have an extensive scouting system, good contacts within the game now, or are we adopting a Brentford like approach and using specific data to sign players?
That approach hasn't done Brentford any harm. We've had a twatful of players over the years that have flattered to deceive.Doing your homework before you sign someone is refreshing.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:00 pm
wez1927 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Yes you arejust like mine is your a misery gutts ,I'm sure there will be a signing that you would like one day ,I'm waiting for the humble pie post when we are flying this season, keep the faith !
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:26 pm
Barclay1 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Yes you arejust like mine is your a misery gutts ,I'm sure there will be a signing that you would like one day ,I'm waiting for the humble pie post when we are flying this season, keep the faith !
If this sort of response makes you feel better then great.
I'll post my opinions, who I like as a signing and who I dont. Apart from Tanner, who I ultimately accepted was a player with promise having been given info on this board re his liks to other clubs, tell me which signings I have disliked?
Also tell me which signings i have suggested are decent?
Ill ignore the misery guts, as its a little childish.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:43 pm
TheHangedMan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Yes you arejust like mine is your a misery gutts ,I'm sure there will be a signing that you would like one day ,I'm waiting for the humble pie post when we are flying this season, keep the faith !
If this sort of response makes you feel better then great.
I'll post my opinions, who I like as a signing and who I dont. Apart from Tanner, who I ultimately accepted was a player with promise having been given info on this board re his liks to other clubs, tell me which signings I have disliked?
Also tell me which signings i have suggested are decent?
Ill ignore the misery guts, as its a little childish.
I don't think you're a misery guts Barclay, but I must say you do have consistent negativity to all things CCFC.
I get it that some people see the glass as half empty........but you seem to see the glass as just a spit in it. I know you are balanced in your views, but sometimes maybe you over balance. All that said you add a lot to this forum so keep up the good work.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:35 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:43 pm
JulesK wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Fans saying he didnt set the world alight at Bolton, and couldnt get back into their team once he was fit, doesnt bode well for me.
Should be looking at better IMO[/quote
FAN not the plural said that and you just copied that from a post Annis posted off a FAN .
Accept you do not like sub standard but your negatively to the board is farcical.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:49 pm
Barclay1 wrote:TheHangedMan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Yes you arejust like mine is your a misery gutts ,I'm sure there will be a signing that you would like one day ,I'm waiting for the humble pie post when we are flying this season, keep the faith !
If this sort of response makes you feel better then great.
I'll post my opinions, who I like as a signing and who I dont. Apart from Tanner, who I ultimately accepted was a player with promise having been given info on this board re his liks to other clubs, tell me which signings I have disliked?
Also tell me which signings i have suggested are decent?
Ill ignore the misery guts, as its a little childish.
I don't think you're a misery guts Barclay, but I must say you do have consistent negativity to all things CCFC.
I get it that some people see the glass as half empty........but you seem to see the glass as just a spit in it. I know you are balanced in your views, but sometimes maybe you over balance. All that said you add a lot to this forum so keep up the good work.
A far more appropriate response that deserves a proper reply.
I acvept fully that I am more negative than many posters, but I dont like to accept sub standard, or, in my eyes, a board that decides that we should accept sub standard, when we don't necessarily need to.
I certainly dont advocate spending big, but spending appropriately.
Millwall just bought for 1.7M, and had a 1.5M bid turned down. Shows money is there, and from a club that has not had our riches over the years.
Has the 'club' given us anything to get excited about over the last few years? No, in my opinion.
Not adding to my negativity, but its very worrying that we pin hopes and excitement on a player that a league club didn't want after he was offered to them for nothing, and while he was there on loan, he struggled to get into their side, and when he did he didnt 'set the world alight'
You can't tell me Im the only one who thinks this. There are some posters here who simply back their posts by ridicule and criticism then try and get backing by pretending to be funny.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:53 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:55 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:55 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:Barclay1 wrote:TheHangedMan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Am I allowed to have an opinion?
Yes you arejust like mine is your a misery gutts ,I'm sure there will be a signing that you would like one day ,I'm waiting for the humble pie post when we are flying this season, keep the faith !
If this sort of response makes you feel better then great.
I'll post my opinions, who I like as a signing and who I dont. Apart from Tanner, who I ultimately accepted was a player with promise having been given info on this board re his liks to other clubs, tell me which signings I have disliked?
Also tell me which signings i have suggested are decent?
Ill ignore the misery guts, as its a little childish.
I don't think you're a misery guts Barclay, but I must say you do have consistent negativity to all things CCFC.
I get it that some people see the glass as half empty........but you seem to see the glass as just a spit in it. I know you are balanced in your views, but sometimes maybe you over balance. All that said you add a lot to this forum so keep up the good work.
A far more appropriate response that deserves a proper reply.
I acvept fully that I am more negative than many posters, but I dont like to accept sub standard, or, in my eyes, a board that decides that we should accept sub standard, when we don't necessarily need to.
I certainly dont advocate spending big, but spending appropriately.
Millwall just bought for 1.7M, and had a 1.5M bid turned down. Shows money is there, and from a club that has not had our riches over the years.
Has the 'club' given us anything to get excited about over the last few years? No, in my opinion.
Not adding to my negativity, but its very worrying that we pin hopes and excitement on a player that a league club didn't want after he was offered to them for nothing, and while he was there on loan, he struggled to get into their side, and when he did he didnt 'set the world alight'
You can't tell me Im the only one who thinks this. There are some posters here who simply back their posts by ridicule and criticism then try and get backing by pretending to be funny.
Just because millwall have money doesn’t mean that we should. The “riches” we had have been wasted on transfers & wages - Warnock has a lot to answer for but then the bottom line is that the Board backed him. We rarely make a big profit on a player, nothing like those up west seem able to do time and time again.
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:57 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:58 pm
pembroke allan wrote:a leopard cannot change it spots unless you paint it whilte! So think everyone is wasting their time pointing out something that as been obvious for long time.......
So why spoil his enjoyment just let him be happy saying what he does afterall it's his choice....