Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:45 pm
Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:51 pm
Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:11 pm
Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:37 pm
Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:42 pm
Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:31 am
piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:49 am
northside of risca wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
If was criminal but equally poor to throw the lad out to dry like we did. He was made a scapegoat in the battle between MM and Tan. The lad should have gone on 2 or 3 loan deals to prove his worth . Agreed, that is not what was needed at the time but we should never have taken a £8m bath on the lad ( or whatever the sum was ) . 9 years later he’s probably worth the asking price . We’ve spunked a lot of money over the years. The Ole signings were all gash .
Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:51 am
Sat Jun 04, 2022 8:02 am
Forever Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
If was criminal but equally poor to throw the lad out to dry like we did. He was made a scapegoat in the battle between MM and Tan. The lad should have gone on 2 or 3 loan deals to prove his worth . Agreed, that is not what was needed at the time but we should never have taken a £8m bath on the lad ( or whatever the sum was ) . 9 years later he’s probably worth the asking price . We’ve spunked a lot of money over the years. The Ole signings were all gash .
Absolutely Spot on.
Sat Jun 04, 2022 8:17 am
piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
Sat Jun 04, 2022 8:30 am
Abergavenny wrote:Forever Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
If was criminal but equally poor to throw the lad out to dry like we did. He was made a scapegoat in the battle between MM and Tan. The lad should have gone on 2 or 3 loan deals to prove his worth . Agreed, that is not what was needed at the time but we should never have taken a £8m bath on the lad ( or whatever the sum was ) . 9 years later he’s probably worth the asking price . We’ve spunked a lot of money over the years. The Ole signings were all gash .
That’s a fair shout on Morrison . Zaha was appalling for us . A player that probably won’t do it for anyone outside of palace / his boyhood club
Absolutely Spot on.
Bit unfair to say all Ole’s signings were gash Morrison , Magna and Fabio were ok and Zaha on loan was a disaster but we all wanted him at the time and Kenwyn Jones came with a great record to us Bergunstaler ( or something like that ) has gone on to have a decent career
Sat Jun 04, 2022 10:03 am
barnet blue wrote:I don’t know why people judged him so quickly, Malky said he was a long term project which obviously we needed having just been promoted. 8 years on and he’s showing he’s not far off what we paid for him.
Sat Jun 04, 2022 10:27 am
Elwood Blues wrote:barnet blue wrote:I don’t know why people judged him so quickly, Malky said he was a long term project which obviously we needed having just been promoted. 8 years on and he’s showing he’s not far off what we paid for him.
We didn't need a long term project (and certainly not 8 years!). We needed an experience striker who could score goals straightaway
Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:48 pm
northside of risca wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Ogmore by blue wrote:One for the future like 10 years in to the future!
Correct, it was absolutely criminal what we paid for him. I remember he came in as a sub at Anfield and even the Liverpool fans were laughing at him !!
I still say there was something dodgy about that deal.
If was criminal but equally poor to throw the lad out to dry like we did. He was made a scapegoat in the battle between MM and Tan. The lad should have gone on 2 or 3 loan deals to prove his worth . Agreed, that is not what was needed at the time but we should never have taken a £8m bath on the lad ( or whatever the sum was ) . 9 years later he’s probably worth the asking price . We’ve spunked a lot of money over the years. The Ole signings were all gash .