The fact Huddersfield are 2nd shows how poor the Championshi

The fact Huddersfield are 2nd shows how poor the Championship is this year.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Poor in quality.

Great in entertainment.

Same thing said season after season! Its more case of it being more competitive compared to other leagues.... why are relegated teams with same premier league squad are struggling if the league is poor? Teams who struggled last season are doing well this time and teams that did well are struggling? Thats not down to championship being poor as it happens every season..... only once as 2 relegated teams gone straight back up poor it is not competitive yes.

They aren't really second though and they haven't lost for 4 months


As Allan says, people say it every season, so imagine how awful this league is compared to 20 years ago

We hear how poor the league is every year, when has it not been poor league.

The fact Huddersfield are 2nd shows how poor the Championship is this year.

Is it?

And your evidence is where exactly; or are you saying only certain clubs can be at the top to make it a 'good' Championship?

It's as competitive as ever, no one is guaranteed anything and it will go to the wire...

What more do you want?

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

What is with the (sic) ? Did someone else write this & you put (sic) there or do you think that is the correct use of their? Or is it some sort of inside joke?

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

What is with the (sic) ? Did someone else write this & you put (sic) there or do you think that is the correct use of their? Or is it some sort of inside joke?

Here you go; pick the meat morsels out of this...

"Sic is a Latin term meaning “thus.” It is used to indicate that something incorrectly written is intentionally being left as it was in the original. Sic is usually italicised and always surrounded by brackets to indicate that it was not part of the original. Place [sic] right after the error."

Basically, maccydee got it right in his prose, i.e. '(sic)' after the incorrect use of 'their' rather than correcting to 'there'

Your use in your pointless response was most certainly not (correct prose), so I'm not too sure what your (sic) getting at in the first place?

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

Ninian 27 always uses their when he means there.

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

Ninian 27 always uses their when he means there.

I didn't know who had originally written it, thanks for the clarification of what was going on.

Their (sic) is no way anyone can say that about the championship.

Teams that came down pretty much kept their squads intact.

Granted not much has been spent but championship performances in the cup have shown their (sic) is plenty of quality.

What is with the (sic) ? Did someone else write this & you put (sic) there or do you think that is the correct use of their? Or is it some sort of inside joke?

Here you go; pick the meat morsels out of this...

"Sic is a Latin term meaning “thus.” It is used to indicate that something incorrectly written is intentionally being left as it was in the original. Sic is usually italicised and always surrounded by brackets to indicate that it was not part of the original. Place [sic] right after the error."

Basically, maccydee got it right in his prose, i.e. '(sic)' after the incorrect use of 'their' rather than correcting to 'there'

Your use in your pointless response was most certainly not (correct prose), so I'm not too sure what your (sic) getting at in the first place?

Are you okay or just looking to have a go at anyone? I know what it means, just didn't understand why it was there.