Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:27 pm

WHY DOES DJ PLAY THESE PLAYERS. I KNOW WEV GOT INJURIES BUT SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE, THEY ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE IN THE TEAM IF WE WANT AUTOMATIC PROMOTION. ITS LIKE WATCHING THE OLD CARDIFF PLAY. :evil: :evil:

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:28 pm

its Shit

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:28 pm

HUDSON SUPPOSEDLEY HAD A GOOD START THEN WENT DOWN HILL FAST!! ERROR AFTER ERROR!!

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:28 pm

Hudson has been average and Rae has just come on. I am far more annoyed with Keough, Burke and Whitts

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:34 pm

absolutely shocking. i literally hope both players leave in Jan. hudson fault for the goal then imo, left mathews to deal with scotland while he was out of position waving his arm around

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:51 pm

The Douce wrote: absolutely shocking. i literally hope both players leave in Jan. hudson fault for the goal then imo, left mathews to deal with scotland while he was out of position waving his arm around




The cross was over Hudson, and Matthews played Scotland on. If he'd stayed in line with Gyepes and Hudson there wouldn't have been a problem. Matthews fault. Nothing the other 2 could have done.

And why do you just accpet that Ipswich can get easy crosses inlike that ?

Unbeleiveable how some people are looking to blame him for everything.
We'll lose today, no suprise.

Oli and Bellamy back next week and we'll take it out on Millwall. :ayatollah:

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:56 pm

Lawnmower wrote:
Unbeleiveable how some people are looking to blame him for everything.


Was thinking along the same lines.

As soon as things goe against us you just know that you're going to see the same players getting blamed. There was not much in the game until Matthews heads a harmless cross in then he plays the boy onside for the second.

We're down to third, hardly a disaster. We need to bounce back.

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:58 pm

Lawnmower wrote:
The Douce wrote: absolutely shocking. i literally hope both players leave in Jan. hudson fault for the goal then imo, left mathews to deal with scotland while he was out of position waving his arm around




The cross was over Hudson, and Matthews played Scotland on. If he'd stayed in line with Gyepes and Hudson there wouldn't have been a problem. Matthews fault. Nothing the other 2 could have done.

And why do you just accpet that Ipswich can get easy crosses inlike that ?

Unbeleiveable how some people are looking to blame him for everything.
We'll lose today, no suprise.

Oli and Bellamy back next week and we'll take it out on Millwall. :ayatollah:


funny that is considering hudson been marking scotland the whole game and let him run off him back line of donkeys end of,then again a snail could run past that tw*t

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:58 pm

yep mathews fault for the two goals even got his head on the second goal cross only to knock it down to scotland wonder whats up with Kev mac

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:00 pm

tynesideblue wrote:yep mathews fault for the two goals even got his head on the second goal cross only to knock it down to scotland wonder whats up with Kev mac


probly cause he cant do 3 games a week

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:02 pm

bluebird1977 wrote:
Lawnmower wrote:
The Douce wrote: absolutely shocking. i literally hope both players leave in Jan. hudson fault for the goal then imo, left mathews to deal with scotland while he was out of position waving his arm around




The cross was over Hudson, and Matthews played Scotland on. If he'd stayed in line with Gyepes and Hudson there wouldn't have been a problem. Matthews fault. Nothing the other 2 could have done.

And why do you just accpet that Ipswich can get easy crosses inlike that ?

Unbeleiveable how some people are looking to blame him for everything.
We'll lose today, no suprise.

Oli and Bellamy back next week and we'll take it out on Millwall. :ayatollah:


funny that is considering hudson been marking scotland the whole game and let him run off him back line of donkeys end of,then again a snail could run past that tw*t

exactly you say the cross was over him.. but hudson had been man marking all game with gypes picking up the crosses...
and of course im looking for someone to blame... not everyone is playing shit.. but the rest are average at best..
RAE AND HUDSON OUT

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:04 pm

What on earth did Rae do wrong today?!

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:05 pm

Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:What on earth did Rae do wrong today?!

what did he do right
he is constantly out of position, he can barely pass the ball, he has no pace and no vision

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:09 pm

The cross was over Hudson, and Matthews played Scotland on. If he'd stayed in line with Gyepes and Hudson there wouldn't have been a problem. Matthews fault. Nothing the other 2 could have done.

And why do you just accpet that Ipswich can get easy crosses inlike that ?

Unbeleiveable how some people are looking to blame him for everything.
We'll lose today, no suprise.

Oli and Bellamy back next week and we'll take it out on Millwall. :ayatollah:[/quote]

funny that is considering hudson been marking scotland the whole game and let him run off him back line of donkeys end of,then again a snail could run past that tw*t[/quote]
exactly you say the cross was over him.. but hudson had been man marking all game with gypes picking up the crosses...
and of course im looking for someone to blame... not everyone is playing shit.. but the rest are average at best..
RAE AND HUDSON OUT
[/quote]


No he wasn't Gyepes was marking Wickham with Hudson the spare (as he has been all season), Blake was picking up Scotland from the start.

This time Scotland had pushed on and Matthews was nearest. Its gone over Gyepes and Hudson and they expected him to be off, but matthews played him on. Down to Matthews to deal with him then, but no chance as he isn't strong enough.

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:11 pm

Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:What on earth did Rae do wrong today?!

HE DIDNT DO ANYTHING THATS THE POINT AND WHEN HE DOES TRY TO PASS THE BALL , ITS ALWAYS INCOMPLETE. SORRY BUT RAE SHOULD NOT BE IN THE TEAM.

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:14 pm

darcy was not on scotland as he was not playing that deep, often whickam went out wide and it was naylor who picked him up. im telling you scotland was hudson's man, and he left him wander, yes mathews should have kept the line but to rely on linesman to stop them scoring is a pretty poor excuse and he should have been covered just incase

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:23 pm

I agree LM Matthews had a shocker - not only did he play Scotland on he headed the ball into his path as he ran on. If we're honest we can look at the whole defence and should be worried!!

Marshall - Good keeper at this level but prone to "a gaff a game"
Heaton - As above with a lot less experience
Naylor - Excellent addition to the squad
Geype - Average player at best in championship
Hudson - Average 1st Div player at best
McNaughton - Very good at this level but injury prone
Blake - Local lad but if we're honest a very average player at this level
Matthews - Nothing like as good as his early promise suggested
Quinn - Nowhere near good enough, 1st Div quality
Riggott - Unfit and injury prone but with potential to be excellent at this level

In summary we need a fit Riggott and an additional CB as IMO all of the above with the exception of Naylor and McNaughton are back up or squad players not first choice. The benefit of having such a strong attacking line up and variety of options is that we will be defending a lot less.............hopefully!! Roll on Millwall.......City 5 - 1 Millwalll

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:56 pm

The Douce wrote:darcy was not on scotland as he was not playing that deep, often whickam went out wide and it was naylor who picked him up. im telling you scotland was hudson's man, and he left him wander, yes mathews should have kept the line but to rely on linesman to stop them scoring is a pretty poor excuse and he should have been covered just incase


The stram was poor but I can't see why you could think this was the case.
Even Perry said that Scotland was being picked up by Blake - for hudson to have been his marker he would have had to play ost of the game in the centre circle Scotland was so deep.
Centre halfs play 1-mark (Gyepes), 1-float (Hudson).

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:11 pm

Lawnmower wrote:
The Douce wrote:darcy was not on scotland as he was not playing that deep, often whickam went out wide and it was naylor who picked him up. im telling you scotland was hudson's man, and he left him wander, yes mathews should have kept the line but to rely on linesman to stop them scoring is a pretty poor excuse and he should have been covered just incase


The stram was poor but I can't see why you could think this was the case.
Even Perry said that Scotland was being picked up by Blake - for hudson to have been his marker he would have had to play ost of the game in the centre circle Scotland was so deep.
Centre halfs play 1-mark (Gyepes), 1-float (Hudson).


Not today gyepes was covering most of the game.
The ball travelled 30 yards with that distance a centre half should be attacking the ball or droping in.
Matthews was slow to react but a center half with hudsons experiance should be watching over him and doing the talking,also he should of reacted himself. the reason he didn't was he's slow and can't read the game, If he could our defence wouldn't be under that sort of presure.

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:19 pm

i forgot Rae IS A BAG OF BOLLOCKS i might of sais that before :?: :P

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:24 pm

Don't you lot worry, Rae won't be playing that much from now on after Oli has returned.

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:26 pm

FOOTSOLDIER wrote:WHY DOES DJ PLAY THESE PLAYERS. I KNOW WEV GOT INJURIES BUT SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE, THEY ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE IN THE TEAM IF WE WANT AUTOMATIC PROMOTION. ITS LIKE WATCHING THE OLD CARDIFF PLAY. :evil: :evil:


That's a question only DJ can answer but here is a question maybe DJ should ask himself about his CD partnership, how can a 17 year old (Connor Wickham) who has not played a game since pre season, play 83 minutes at full tilt beating up our 2 "experienced" CB in the process.

All we here is our players who did not have a full pre season need time to get match fit, how have Ipswich got Connor Wickam fit enough to put in a performance like that.

What is Roy Keane doing that we are not? :?: :?: :?:

Re: RAE & HUDSON??????

Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:03 pm

Look mate, it says it all that Spurs wanted him for £8m !