Fri Jan 21, 2022 7:51 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:08 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:52 pm
Fri Jan 21, 2022 5:01 pm
nubbsy wrote:The hospitals are empty. Social conditioning at it's finest.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 5:22 pm
castleblue wrote:I watched the charlatan today and wanted to throw the remote at the TV the man really is a grubby little excuse for a politician who like any card carrying member of the looney left cannot admit when he is wrong.
His restriction over the Christmas New Year holidays have yet again been put in place based on a worst case scenario model by Swansea University and like ALL previous models have been shown to be bullshit by REAL WORLD data.
The charlatan even put up a graph, based on a ONS study, which shows Wales had 1 in 20 people with covid per 100,000 on 7th January and the same study showed in England there was 1 in 25 people per 100,000 with covid. He claimed this clearly shows his futile restrictions worked. But at what cost?
Wales has a population of 3.3m so the difference between 1/20 & 1/25 per 100k is that at 1/25 Wales would have had just another 165 people on that day with Covid. So with hospitality settings closed down, sports stadiums empty and even Park Runs with over 50 people not allowed Wales had just 165 fewer covid cases.
That came at a cost of around £1m for each casewhen you look at the amount of income lost to business.
The man is a fecking idiot and just doesn't understand if you make a mistake once or 500 times it's still a mistake and following models to form policy makes him a liability to Wales.
![]()
![]()
Fri Jan 21, 2022 7:49 pm
Bluebina wrote:castleblue wrote:I watched the charlatan today and wanted to throw the remote at the TV the man really is a grubby little excuse for a politician who like any card carrying member of the looney left cannot admit when he is wrong.
His restriction over the Christmas New Year holidays have yet again been put in place based on a worst case scenario model by Swansea University and like ALL previous models have been shown to be bullshit by REAL WORLD data.
The charlatan even put up a graph, based on a ONS study, which shows Wales had 1 in 20 people with covid per 100,000 on 7th January and the same study showed in England there was 1 in 25 people per 100,000 with covid. He claimed this clearly shows his futile restrictions worked. But at what cost?
Wales has a population of 3.3m so the difference between 1/20 & 1/25 per 100k is that at 1/25 Wales would have had just another 165 people on that day with Covid. So with hospitality settings closed down, sports stadiums empty and even Park Runs with over 50 people not allowed Wales had just 165 fewer covid cases.
That came at a cost of around £1m for each casewhen you look at the amount of income lost to business.
The man is a fecking idiot and just doesn't understand if you make a mistake once or 500 times it's still a mistake and following models to form policy makes him a liability to Wales.
![]()
![]()
He showed a graph saying we had slightly less cases than England but it also showed that for the few weeks before we had more case than England, so it averaged out that we had the same but at a cost of millions to the Welsh economy, he made a massive mistake but won't own it!
Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:08 am
castleblue wrote:I watched the charlatan today and wanted to throw the remote at the TV the man really is a grubby little excuse for a politician who like any card carrying member of the looney left cannot admit when he is wrong.
His restriction over the Christmas New Year holidays have yet again been put in place based on a worst case scenario model by Swansea University and like ALL previous models have been shown to be bullshit by REAL WORLD data.
The charlatan even put up a graph, based on a ONS study, which shows Wales had 1 in 20 people with covid per 100,000 on 7th January and the same study showed in England there was 1 in 25 people per 100,000 with covid. He claimed this clearly shows his futile restrictions worked. But at what cost?
Wales has a population of 3.3m so the difference between 1/20 & 1/25 per 100k is that at 1/25 Wales would have had just another 165 people on that day with Covid. So with hospitality settings closed down, sports stadiums empty and even Park Runs with over 50 people not allowed Wales had just 165 fewer covid cases.
That came at a cost of around £1m for each casewhen you look at the amount of income lost to business.
The man is a fecking idiot and just doesn't understand if you make a mistake once or 500 times it's still a mistake and following models to form policy makes him a liability to Wales.
![]()
![]()
Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:17 am
Floppsy wrote:castleblue wrote:I watched the charlatan today and wanted to throw the remote at the TV the man really is a grubby little excuse for a politician who like any card carrying member of the looney left cannot admit when he is wrong.
His restriction over the Christmas New Year holidays have yet again been put in place based on a worst case scenario model by Swansea University and like ALL previous models have been shown to be bullshit by REAL WORLD data.
The charlatan even put up a graph, based on a ONS study, which shows Wales had 1 in 20 people with covid per 100,000 on 7th January and the same study showed in England there was 1 in 25 people per 100,000 with covid. He claimed this clearly shows his futile restrictions worked. But at what cost?
Wales has a population of 3.3m so the difference between 1/20 & 1/25 per 100k is that at 1/25 Wales would have had just another 165 people on that day with Covid. So with hospitality settings closed down, sports stadiums empty and even Park Runs with over 50 people not allowed Wales had just 165 fewer covid cases.
That came at a cost of around £1m for each casewhen you look at the amount of income lost to business.
The man is a fecking idiot and just doesn't understand if you make a mistake once or 500 times it's still a mistake and following models to form policy makes him a liability to Wales.
![]()
![]()
ONS figures aren't per 100,000. They are extrapolated for the whole population so 1 in 25 in Wales means 112k people, not 165.
Edit - so the difference between 1 in 20 and 1 in 25 in Wales is about 15000 people
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... nddiseases
Sat Jan 22, 2022 10:38 am