Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:57 am
Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:07 pm
Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:28 pm
Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:33 pm
Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:54 pm
Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:45 pm
Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:11 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:34 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
Mon Jan 17, 2022 6:03 pm
Barclay1 wrote:If this 'not spending' lark is all down to the CASS and the club win, then I expect things to change next year for the good.
Personally, as you know, even if we win, I'm not convinced anything will change.
Let's see......
Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:44 am
Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:51 pm
Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:17 pm
Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:21 pm
City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:28 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
I am more than happy at the club's approach. We have to become sustainable. The way to do that is by signing high potential low reputation players for small fees and by giving time to our promising young players and selling them on when good offers come in. That money is then used to sign more rough diamonds and support our academy.
Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:32 pm
Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:36 pm
Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
We don't have to agree on everything but I hope I am seen to respect you, Jonathan?![]()
I do think you 'look' for negativity (certainly on the one topic) but it's not that I don't agree with much of it, just that there's no real 'back up' to much of what you write
It's just rumour and conjecture and events of the last few days suggest that certain persons are at least 'trying' to put right the errors of early season (and beyond) even if it's a little after the horse has bolted
I think I always point out you're a good guy?
Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:54 pm
Barclay1 wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
We don't have to agree on everything but I hope I am seen to respect you, Jonathan?![]()
I do think you 'look' for negativity (certainly on the one topic) but it's not that I don't agree with much of it, just that there's no real 'back up' to much of what you write
It's just rumour and conjecture and events of the last few days suggest that certain persons are at least 'trying' to put right the errors of early season (and beyond) even if it's a little after the horse has bolted
I think I always point out you're a good guy?
Sven, indeed, that's why I said 'most', not all.
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:35 am
Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:50 am
Igovernor wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Chris it seems that there are city players that are refusing to be vaccinated and therefore clubs are not willing to take them. We are also having problems getting players in as we are not going to loan unvaccinated players!
Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:39 am
Sven wrote:Igovernor wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Chris it seems that there are city players that are refusing to be vaccinated and therefore clubs are not willing to take them. We are also having problems getting players in as we are not going to loan unvaccinated players!
Makes sense, mate. I don't understand why such an apparent high number of players (and sports people in general are so against the vaccines but it is seemingly causing problems for them and their clubs/sports, which has a knock on effect
Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:26 pm
Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:45 pm
Igovernor wrote:There are going to be a lot of players out of a job come seasons end!
Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:10 pm
Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:35 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:Igovernor wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Chris it seems that there are city players that are refusing to be vaccinated and therefore clubs are not willing to take them. We are also having problems getting players in as we are not going to loan unvaccinated players!
Makes sense, mate. I don't understand why such an apparent high number of players (and sports people in general are so against the vaccines but it is seemingly causing problems for them and their clubs/sports, which has a knock on effect
For me Chris, I do understand that athletes throughout the world don’t won’t to put this substance in their bodies.
Just like they don’t have the flu vaccine because they don’t need it as their immune system can do what it’s meant to do.
It does have an effect on the football and sports world but I support their individual right to what they decide.
Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:16 pm
City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
You'd receive more respect if your posts weren't so predictable. You only have to see your name and you know the post will be critising the club in some way. Of course it is your choice to do that. But you can't moan about people calling you negative when everything you post is some negative swipe at the club. It really is boring.
Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:06 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:Igovernor wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Chris it seems that there are city players that are refusing to be vaccinated and therefore clubs are not willing to take them. We are also having problems getting players in as we are not going to loan unvaccinated players!
Makes sense, mate. I don't understand why such an apparent high number of players (and sports people in general are so against the vaccines but it is seemingly causing problems for them and their clubs/sports, which has a knock on effect
For me Chris, I do understand that athletes throughout the world don’t won’t to put this substance in their bodies.
Just like they don’t have the flu vaccine because they don’t need it as their immune system can do what it’s meant to do.
It does have an effect on the football and sports world but I support their individual right to what they decide.
Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:20 pm
nubbsy wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:Igovernor wrote:Sven wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Certainly for this year; but too early to say for next year, which will surely be influenced by the CAS judgement (either way)?
Chris it seems that there are city players that are refusing to be vaccinated and therefore clubs are not willing to take them. We are also having problems getting players in as we are not going to loan unvaccinated players!
Makes sense, mate. I don't understand why such an apparent high number of players (and sports people in general are so against the vaccines but it is seemingly causing problems for them and their clubs/sports, which has a knock on effect
For me Chris, I do understand that athletes throughout the world don’t won’t to put this substance in their bodies.
Just like they don’t have the flu vaccine because they don’t need it as their immune system can do what it’s meant to do.
It does have an effect on the football and sports world but I support their individual right to what they decide.
Spot on, the risks and uncertainties outweigh the rewards of the vaccines in young, fit people and it doesn't stop them from spreading it.
Protect the vulnerable and let people make their own mind up!
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:02 am
Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:City slicker27 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Barclay1 wrote:They want to see the wages come down first?
That speaks volumes for both now and next year.
Nah lets splash the cash, end up in finincial fp troubles, get lawrence in at 37k a week, and more like it?? But for the grace of god!!
I'd be grateful if you would simply read my previous posts than just have a dig because of the author.
Have I not said in previous posts that we shouldn't 'Splash the cash'?
I realise I am simply a source of humour to most, but at least do the decent thing and look at what I HAVE said.
Disappointing.
You don't need to read your posts though as you bang on about the same thing everytime you post.
Fair enough then, you must be right.
Just typical of the lack of respect I receive on here by most.
You'd receive more respect if your posts weren't so predictable. You only have to see your name and you know the post will be critising the club in some way. Of course it is your choice to do that. But you can't moan about people calling you negative when everything you post is some negative swipe at the club. It really is boring.
Thanks for responding.
I have never moaned about people calling me negative. It's fair game, it opinion.
Where you say 'you only have to see your name' is exactly what its about. In this instance, it was Implied that I had said 'let's splash the cash'. In fact in another thread, I had said that I dont think we should 'splash the cash'.
You may consider me assumptive, but it's disappointing that some assumptions are not correct, and yet, as you say 'as soon as you see my name' the reply is based on me the author not my comments.
I've always afforded respect, but rarely get it back.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:31 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:40 am
Barclay1 wrote:So the poster is more important than the post?
Am I not allowed to criticise the club? By the sounds of it, criticisms of the club whether factual or rumoured are struck down. Wasn't aware some on this board want it to be a dictatorship