Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:11 pm
Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:28 pm
Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:44 pm
Sat Oct 09, 2021 9:51 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:I know there's no changing you and some others but so be it.
You have put your faith in the jab and the rest of it , particularly as you have issues ,and perhaps it will work. It's a really uncomfortable subject for conversation for if the downsides come to pass, well, not a good outcome. If it works the other way then that wont be a good outcome either.
Why do you need a booster? Is it four in Israel?
I posted below on Johnsons speech. The lies are obvious and yet few of you connect.
Sat Oct 09, 2021 10:11 pm
Sat Oct 09, 2021 11:17 pm
Sun Oct 10, 2021 5:05 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.
Sun Oct 10, 2021 1:39 pm
by C. Rombie-Coat » Sat Oct 09, 2021 10:11 pm
Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
Sun Oct 10, 2021 3:03 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:As to leaving the kids alone any person 'double jabbing ' or single jabbing another needs to have a good hard think.
https://www.rintrah.nl/too-many-people- ... ographers/
You may think its all ok now but there was the Nazi secretary who was in Court last week which sounded a nonsense but precedence's have been set. Times change.
'Only obeying orders ' doesn't count.
Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:50 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.
Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:41 am
by Bluebina » Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:50 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.
1. Doesn’t prevent infection - No reduces the chances of catching
2. Doesn’t prevent spread - No reduces the chances of spreading
3. Possibly makes it more infectious - Nonsense
4. Causes mutation and prolongation - Nonsense
5. Limited protection - Nonsense
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death - Nonsense over generalised statement chances are miniscule compared to catching covid
7. Obviously no long term study - over a year and still showing fantastic success
8. And the rest - like what, more straw clutching or nonsense?
Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:17 pm
Scoularite wrote:by Bluebina » Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:50 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.
1. Doesn’t prevent infection - No reduces the chances of catching
2. Doesn’t prevent spread - No reduces the chances of spreading
3. Possibly makes it more infectious - Nonsense
4. Causes mutation and prolongation - Nonsense
5. Limited protection - Nonsense
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death - Nonsense over generalised statement chances are miniscule compared to catching covid
7. Obviously no long term study - over a year and still showing fantastic success
8. And the rest - like what, more straw clutching or nonsense?
But apart from that you agree.![]()
![]()
Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:18 pm
Bluebina wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.
1. Doesn’t prevent infection - No reduces the chances of catching
2. Doesn’t prevent spread - No reduces the chances of spreading
3. Possibly makes it more infectious - Nonsense
4. Causes mutation and prolongation - Nonsense
5. Limited protection - Nonsense
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death - Nonsense over generalised statement chances are miniscule compared to catching covid
7. Obviously no long term study - over a year and still showing fantastic success
8. And the rest - like what, more straw clutching or nonsense?
Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:37 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Who says I am an ‘anti-vaxxer’ which in any event is a pejorative propaganda term. My head is definitely not in the sand. I read all sides of this thing.
I’ve had vaccines. Why wouldn’t I if they are proven safe and of the sterilising variety AKA true vaccines and not experimental genetic therapies?
Is it 'sensible' to have a ‘jab’ when the data shows :
1. Doesn’t prevent infection
2. Doesn’t prevent spread
3. Possibly makes it more infectious
4. Causes mutation and prolongation
5. Limited protection
6. Adverse affects, not least of all death
7. Obviously no long term study
8. And the rest
I’ve had Covid as have my extended family and we did what we needed to do and got on with life. I should add that a Ziverdoo kit of Ivermectin and Zinc was used latterly. Cheap to buy and effective. Suppressed unfortunately.
And btw leave the kids alone with your poisons. Stop being selfish.
As to the politics FFS at your age you should know by now.