maccydee wrote:Has to be given a go surely?
Need some passing ability and drive.
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:maccydee wrote:Has to be given a go surely?
Need some passing ability and drive.
Definitely. Starting on Saturday surely.
maccydee wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:maccydee wrote:Has to be given a go surely?
Need some passing ability and drive.
Definitely. Starting on Saturday surely.
But keep Ng in too.
Or Ng right centre back.
piledriver64 wrote:I wouldn’t argue with giving Sang a game. He certainly looked comfortable last season.
It would be in midfield for me though because Ng looks like he’s back at the level he was before his injury last season.
maccydee wrote:Has to be given a go surely?
Need some passing ability and drive.
CantonStandBob wrote:I may be wrong but I have a feeling Mick was questioned on Sang being pushed in to midfield and he dismissed it completely and said it won't happen, he sees him as a wing back and that is that. It was at the start of the season I am sure of it but can't find the interview where he said it.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:CantonStandBob wrote:I may be wrong but I have a feeling Mick was questioned on Sang being pushed in to midfield and he dismissed it completely and said it won't happen, he sees him as a wing back and that is that. It was at the start of the season I am sure of it but can't find the interview where he said it.
Not sure if MM made that comment or not but if things continue and we keep on losing then he might have to reconsider. One reason why he might not want Sang in midfield is because MM thinks we already have good option in that position
maccydee wrote:Has to be given a go surely?
Need some passing ability and drive.
CantonStandBob wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:CantonStandBob wrote:I may be wrong but I have a feeling Mick was questioned on Sang being pushed in to midfield and he dismissed it completely and said it won't happen, he sees him as a wing back and that is that. It was at the start of the season I am sure of it but can't find the interview where he said it.
Not sure if MM made that comment or not but if things continue and we keep on losing then he might have to reconsider. One reason why he might not want Sang in midfield is because MM thinks we already have good option in that position
I am certain he did and his response was his usual dismissive way, it was when people were asking if he could find a place in the team for Ng and Sang together and it was suggested Sang can operate in midfield as he started his career there.
Either way yeah, he needs to vary it we have no drive forward from midfield and I am in the minority who thinks Pack is playing relatively well this season so Sang alongside him to get forward can't be worse than Vaulks anyway at least until Ralls is back.
Abergavenny wrote:Has anyone ever seen him play in midfield Not sure he has ever played there in senior football. He certainly looks like one of the more comfortable on the ball in the city team thou One would assume that he must have played in midfield in youth teams at some stage but he was better at right back
piledriver64 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:Has anyone ever seen him play in midfield Not sure he has ever played there in senior football. He certainly looks like one of the more comfortable on the ball in the city team thou One would assume that he must have played in midfield in youth teams at some stage but he was better at right back
I thought he was a midfielder throughout his young/academy career and only played at full back when he broke into the team last season out of necessity. So certainly not a stranger to midfield.
Users browsing this forum: BluebirdNorth, Cardiff_CPT, Clickagy [Bot], cmorris1927, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Proximic [Bot], Verity [Bot], worcester_ccfc and 188 guests