Sat Feb 27, 2021 7:15 pm
Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:33 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:20 am
Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:31 am
Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:45 am
Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:25 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:46 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2021 4:00 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Going for 2-1 again! Derby have improved some of late,so I think it will be close, but we need to switch it up a little,my concer is with the way we are playing,who can replace Moore,who is looking a tad jaded(his 100% all out attitude and effort catching up) 10 undefeated! Isnt that one better than the jacks this season? Im sure i read on here they went 9 games?, if so, so have we,lol.
Sun Feb 28, 2021 4:07 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2021 4:15 pm
Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
Sun Feb 28, 2021 4:55 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2021 6:09 pm
Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:23 am
Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:39 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
My concerns also, when Glatzel left, MM said he'd have no problems playing Watters or Harris, and yet neither has really featured ? Moore looked out on his feet at boro,and the schedule just gets mote manic! Plus he will feature on international duty, if he burns out,what then? Harris and someone else up front? As I don't think Watters can be impressing MM in training,otherwise why not in the squad,and not u 23's instead? Let's hope MM has a plan in mind,just in case.![]()
![]()
Ps not having a pop at Watters, and I hope he is just "settling in" as it's a step up from where he has been playing.
Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:01 pm
Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:19 pm
Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
My concerns also, when Glatzel left, MM said he'd have no problems playing Watters or Harris, and yet neither has really featured ? Moore looked out on his feet at boro,and the schedule just gets mote manic! Plus he will feature on international duty, if he burns out,what then? Harris and someone else up front? As I don't think Watters can be impressing MM in training,otherwise why not in the squad,and not u 23's instead? Let's hope MM has a plan in mind,just in case.![]()
![]()
Ps not having a pop at Watters, and I hope he is just "settling in" as it's a step up from where he has been playing.
Glatzel, Harris, watters, wilson, ojo or Murphy. It doesnt matter who it is as none are target men. So glatzel isn't really a loss there. Glatzel wasn't particularly skillful, creative, quick or strong on the ball. So isnt really a loss there either.
Its difficult to bring moore off when the game is tight as he is an easy outlet for the defence when we are under pressure and he is also very useful at defending corners or freekicks. If anything happens to Moore City will have to adapt their game and get the ball up to our front men in a way they can deal with it. To feet, through the channels or over the top. It wouldn't be any different if glatzel was still here.
Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:26 pm
Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:43 pm
Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:50 pm
Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:28 am
Forever Blue wrote:Derby County:
After a tricky start to the campaign, Wayne Rooney’s transition from player-coach to permanent manager at Pride Park has helped the Rams move away from the relegation places. County currently occupy 18th position in the Championship table, with ten wins, eight draws and 14 defeats from their 32 league matches. Derby hold a nine-point lead over 22nd place Rotherham United, and could move as high as 15th with victory in South Wales.
The Rams’ poor beginning to the season, which saw them sitting at the foot of the table for most of November, led to the dismissal of Phillip Cocu on November 14th. Indeed, County have enjoyed a mid-season revival under their new manager, moving out of the drop zone on December 29th and pulling clear of the bottom three in recent weeks. Since Rooney was named as Derby’s permanent boss on November 26th, his side have picked up 32 points, suffering just five Championship defeats.
Derby come into Tuesday’s clash with six victories from their last nine matches. In late January, the Rams recorded three consecutive wins, defeating AFC Bournemouth, Queens Park Rangers and Bristol City, with a 1-0 scoreline in all three games. Defeat to Rotherham United followed, but the Rams returned to winning ways by beating Middlesbrough and Wycombe Wanderers. In their most recent outing, County earned a 1-1 draw with their fierce local rivals, Nottingham Forest.
Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:09 am
Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:20 am
Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:58 am
Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:37 am
Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:42 am
Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:43 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
My concerns also, when Glatzel left, MM said he'd have no problems playing Watters or Harris, and yet neither has really featured ? Moore looked out on his feet at boro,and the schedule just gets mote manic! Plus he will feature on international duty, if he burns out,what then? Harris and someone else up front? As I don't think Watters can be impressing MM in training,otherwise why not in the squad,and not u 23's instead? Let's hope MM has a plan in mind,just in case.![]()
![]()
Ps not having a pop at Watters, and I hope he is just "settling in" as it's a step up from where he has been playing.
Glatzel, Harris, watters, wilson, ojo or Murphy. It doesnt matter who it is as none are target men. So glatzel isn't really a loss there. Glatzel wasn't particularly skillful, creative, quick or strong on the ball. So isnt really a loss there either.
Its difficult to bring moore off when the game is tight as he is an easy outlet for the defence when we are under pressure and he is also very useful at defending corners or freekicks. If anything happens to Moore City will have to adapt their game and get the ball up to our front men in a way they can deal with it. To feet, through the channels or over the top. It wouldn't be any different if glatzel was still here.
I take it you dont like glatzel then! I never mentioned him being missed did I? Just pointed out MM had said he would have no worries playing watters, when now it seems he isnt sure? Lets hope his 2nd half performance gives him a lift today(watters,as he scored 2 for u 23's) but it doesnt seem he is ready to step up yet,time will tell.I dont agree re glatzel by the way,but thats opinions for you.
Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:31 pm
Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:30 pm
Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:30 pm
Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
My concerns also, when Glatzel left, MM said he'd have no problems playing Watters or Harris, and yet neither has really featured ? Moore looked out on his feet at boro,and the schedule just gets mote manic! Plus he will feature on international duty, if he burns out,what then? Harris and someone else up front? As I don't think Watters can be impressing MM in training,otherwise why not in the squad,and not u 23's instead? Let's hope MM has a plan in mind,just in case.![]()
![]()
Ps not having a pop at Watters, and I hope he is just "settling in" as it's a step up from where he has been playing.
Glatzel, Harris, watters, wilson, ojo or Murphy. It doesnt matter who it is as none are target men. So glatzel isn't really a loss there. Glatzel wasn't particularly skillful, creative, quick or strong on the ball. So isnt really a loss there either.
Its difficult to bring moore off when the game is tight as he is an easy outlet for the defence when we are under pressure and he is also very useful at defending corners or freekicks. If anything happens to Moore City will have to adapt their game and get the ball up to our front men in a way they can deal with it. To feet, through the channels or over the top. It wouldn't be any different if glatzel was still here.
I take it you dont like glatzel then! I never mentioned him being missed did I? Just pointed out MM had said he would have no worries playing watters, when now it seems he isnt sure? Lets hope his 2nd half performance gives him a lift today(watters,as he scored 2 for u 23's) but it doesnt seem he is ready to step up yet,time will tell.I dont agree re glatzel by the way,but thats opinions for you.
Whether I liked him or not doesn't change anything. He was an average player in the wrong team. You asked what will happen if Moore gets injured now that glatzel has gone, and I answered. Glatzel was not a target man and doesnt bring more to the table than what wilson or ojo could do playing as a forward. Harris and watters are similar players so you don't really need both on the bench. Maybe mick just prefers Harris.
Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:21 pm
bluesince62 wrote:Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Escott1927 wrote:bluesince62 wrote:Danny Says wrote:Crayfish wrote:Problem is there is no replacement for Moore.
Pity we didn't get Cameron Jerome during the January window he would have been excellent cover for Moore.
That is the problem, or would be if he gets injured. He’s in the game for 90 minutes and has no chance for a breather.
Not sure why he let Glatzel go without having a replacement. Maybe he thought he had Jerome lined up.
It’s a tall task for Moore to stay fit for 90 minutes every time; as I said above we then play in 72 hours time. Plus he’s got the international week.
My concerns also, when Glatzel left, MM said he'd have no problems playing Watters or Harris, and yet neither has really featured ? Moore looked out on his feet at boro,and the schedule just gets mote manic! Plus he will feature on international duty, if he burns out,what then? Harris and someone else up front? As I don't think Watters can be impressing MM in training,otherwise why not in the squad,and not u 23's instead? Let's hope MM has a plan in mind,just in case.![]()
![]()
Ps not having a pop at Watters, and I hope he is just "settling in" as it's a step up from where he has been playing.
Glatzel, Harris, watters, wilson, ojo or Murphy. It doesnt matter who it is as none are target men. So glatzel isn't really a loss there. Glatzel wasn't particularly skillful, creative, quick or strong on the ball. So isnt really a loss there either.
Its difficult to bring moore off when the game is tight as he is an easy outlet for the defence when we are under pressure and he is also very useful at defending corners or freekicks. If anything happens to Moore City will have to adapt their game and get the ball up to our front men in a way they can deal with it. To feet, through the channels or over the top. It wouldn't be any different if glatzel was still here.
I take it you dont like glatzel then! I never mentioned him being missed did I? Just pointed out MM had said he would have no worries playing watters, when now it seems he isnt sure? Lets hope his 2nd half performance gives him a lift today(watters,as he scored 2 for u 23's) but it doesnt seem he is ready to step up yet,time will tell.I dont agree re glatzel by the way,but thats opinions for you.
Whether I liked him or not doesn't change anything. He was an average player in the wrong team. You asked what will happen if Moore gets injured now that glatzel has gone, and I answered. Glatzel was not a target man and doesnt bring more to the table than what wilson or ojo could do playing as a forward. Harris and watters are similar players so you don't really need both on the bench. Maybe mick just prefers Harris.
I didnt "ask" anything I voiced my concern,and was aimed at what MM had said regards to playing watters! The only mention of glatzel was in reference to the statement mm had made at the time of leaving(glatzel) hope that clarifies it for you?.