Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:00 pm
Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:35 pm
Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Nobby, we have never replaced Loovens and Johnson.
Hudson £14,000 a week a Joke.
Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:20 pm
Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:57 am
Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:30 am
But one thing we do ,do now ! that if we go behined we fight like hell to get back on line.
Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:43 am
Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:44 am
Forever Blue wrote:Nobby, we have never replaced Loovens and Johnson.
Hudson £14,000 a week a Joke.
Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:55 am
007 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Nobby, we have never replaced Loovens and Johnson.
Hudson £14,000 a week a Joke.
Is that Hudson or the 14K - making such broad comments is not helpful.
Hudson is part of a unit which has been improved with the addition of Turner and the stats quoted above and our league position suggests he and our defence are not a joke. As for his wages you have to look at this in the context of the last couple of seasons and some of the 'superstars' we had and the wages they were on - not his fault.
Yes he is short of some pace but as are a lot of CD at this level where physicality is more important than sheer pace - otherwise they would be playing in the Prem.
Can our defence be improved of course it can but the same can be said for our midfield, goalkeeper and strikeforce. As for replacing Loovens and Johnson they were/are very good players but we have had our best league positions since they have left and we have to move on.![]()
![]()
Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:36 am
Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:24 pm