Why the hell did Harris sign

Why the hell did Harris sign Benkovic, when he never plays him??

Leicester City said Benkovic was match fit when we signed him.

Annis you'll get same answer everytime from Harris hes not match fit! Yet puts him on bench same with bagan he can play but he insists on playing bacuna there out of position? Today hes done nothing to change anything? Or us he saying by putting in vaulks and Harris we are going to be more attacking, and that will solve defensive frailties? Honestly don't know the logic behind team selection today.

Annis you'll get same answer everytime from Harris hes not match fit! Yet puts him on bench same with bagan he can play but he insists on playing bacuna there out of position? Today hes done nothing to change anything? Or us he saying by putting in vaulks and Harris we are going to be more attacking, and that will solve defensive frailties? Honestly don't know the logic behind team selection today.

Sorry,but hmmmmm more attacking!!

Annis you'll get same answer everytime from Harris hes not match fit! Yet puts him on bench same with bagan he can play but he insists on playing bacuna there out of position? Today hes done nothing to change anything? Or us he saying by putting in vaulks and Harris we are going to be more attacking, and that will solve defensive frailties? Honestly don't know the logic behind team selection today.

Sorry,but hmmmmm more attacking!!

You saying putting in a forward a midfielder made us more attacking? Sorry on paper they were no better than ones replaced! Harris looked ok took goal well but other 3goals were from corners... so if you think Harris changed his philosophy of safety 1st by swapping like for like fair enough its about opinions but putting bacuna in midfield is an attacking move!