Tue Sep 08, 2020 9:49 pm
Tue Sep 08, 2020 11:09 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:08 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Black lives Matter and Antifa are also exempt from this as it’s a peaceful demonstration
Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:15 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Black lives Matter and Antifa are also exempt from this as it’s a peaceful demonstration
We have differing views on BLM.
I've not looked into it but if what you say is true, then that's not good.
Understand that schools, workplaces etc are exempt - that makes sense.
But if the PM is implementing this rule, it should apply to anything outside an essential gathering.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:45 am
Wed Sep 09, 2020 7:05 am
WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Wed Sep 09, 2020 7:20 am
Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:08 am
Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:15 am
llan bluebird wrote:To my recollection there were no increases in cases at those "mass" demo's.......Anyone disagree ?
We have spiked as all those who had to fly off to holiday hot spots to get their downtime returned and spread it around their community.
Its a socially transmitted virus, all those pictures of twenty-somethings dancing on cars in the med islands is why we are in these measures now, christ knows what Cardiff bay will do.
The Caerphilly rules are the daftest thing I have heard. If the government wants to save the hospitality industry its need to jettison the clubbing and late night element pretty quickly.
I agree with pubs closing at 10pm for a short period to try top dampen this down.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:40 am
Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:46 am
WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:02 am
Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
No because it’s been done loads of times in the past. The narrative pushed by our broadcast media is decent honest EU negotiators sneaky Torres. Truth is Barnier and co have threatened to deny us 3rd country status in the case of a No Deal, something that we thought was a given.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:21 am
WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:11 pm
glas wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
The EU have already said they will IGNORE our borders and protected sea areas, IGNORE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SOVERIGN RIGHTS, and continue to plunder our fish stocks, so destroying the environment (even Greenpeace are on Boris's side in this), destroying even further our fishing fleets and communities, if we do not allow them to continue plundering, uncontrolled and take anything they want from OUR LEGAL INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The EU boast they will ignore international law when it suits them.
But they get all legal and law abiding virtue signalling when our Government brings in laws to protect UK business, reduce bureaucracy and implement internal sovereign laws, that will allow all 4 UK countries to freely trade without bureaucratic hinderance and actually transfers more power to the devolved administrations.
So what is wrong with the Tories sticking up for, and supporting the UK and its people and businesses? Only those with a hatred of Britain, its people and sovereign rights to manage itself would disagree. Unless of course they have a vested personal selfish interest in the EU and it's continued control and abuse of our freedoms.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:31 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:55 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 1:06 pm
montyblue wrote:Jason Mohammed
Radio wales program last 2 days banging on about shuting pubs can't people do without drinking for 12 months his words
which does' nt affect him as a non drinker
i did text the show asking about blm protesters gathering in groups no different to people outside pubs and who is monitering friday prayers in the mosque's and gathering and hugging outside
Did' nt get a mention
Wed Sep 09, 2020 1:41 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
The EU have already said they will IGNORE our borders and protected sea areas, IGNORE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SOVERIGN RIGHTS, and continue to plunder our fish stocks, so destroying the environment (even Greenpeace are on Boris's side in this), destroying even further our fishing fleets and communities, if we do not allow them to continue plundering, uncontrolled and take anything they want from OUR LEGAL INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The EU boast they will ignore international law when it suits them.
But they get all legal and law abiding virtue signalling when our Government brings in laws to protect UK business, reduce bureaucracy and implement internal sovereign laws, that will allow all 4 UK countries to freely trade without bureaucratic hinderance and actually transfers more power to the devolved administrations.
So what is wrong with the Tories sticking up for, and supporting the UK and its people and businesses? Only those with a hatred of Britain, its people and sovereign rights to manage itself would disagree. Unless of course they have a vested personal selfish interest in the EU and it's continued control and abuse of our freedoms.
So now it's the EUs fault that the tories can't arrange a border in Ireland? Don't think so.
Ah fishing, the big problem for the people who don't have a clue. 0.1% of our economy (beaten by woodwork and leather), employing fewer people than pound land, and we don't even eat the majority of food we catch... Good thing we're all prepared on our borders for quick movement of those fish. /s
With no deal (or if Boris collapses and accepts whatever they say) very likely and the country not prepared for brexit yet (as confirmed by the major businesses who use the ports) then the probability of food and medicine shortages is nigh on confirmed. Funny how you say remainers hate Britain but the people who want it to be weakened and people killed don't hate Britain and its people.
And I assume skideman will be here calling it an overreaction or project fear. This is what the government, NHS, affected businesses, and every expert are saying. The only people who aren't are the brexiteers who are, for some reason, getting European passports and moving their assets out. I wonder why?
Wed Sep 09, 2020 1:46 pm
skidemin wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
The EU have already said they will IGNORE our borders and protected sea areas, IGNORE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SOVERIGN RIGHTS, and continue to plunder our fish stocks, so destroying the environment (even Greenpeace are on Boris's side in this), destroying even further our fishing fleets and communities, if we do not allow them to continue plundering, uncontrolled and take anything they want from OUR LEGAL INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The EU boast they will ignore international law when it suits them.
But they get all legal and law abiding virtue signalling when our Government brings in laws to protect UK business, reduce bureaucracy and implement internal sovereign laws, that will allow all 4 UK countries to freely trade without bureaucratic hinderance and actually transfers more power to the devolved administrations.
So what is wrong with the Tories sticking up for, and supporting the UK and its people and businesses? Only those with a hatred of Britain, its people and sovereign rights to manage itself would disagree. Unless of course they have a vested personal selfish interest in the EU and it's continued control and abuse of our freedoms.
So now it's the EUs fault that the tories can't arrange a border in Ireland? Don't think so.
Ah fishing, the big problem for the people who don't have a clue. 0.1% of our economy (beaten by woodwork and leather), employing fewer people than pound land, and we don't even eat the majority of food we catch... Good thing we're all prepared on our borders for quick movement of those fish. /s
With no deal (or if Boris collapses and accepts whatever they say) very likely and the country not prepared for brexit yet (as confirmed by the major businesses who use the ports) then the probability of food and medicine shortages is nigh on confirmed. Funny how you say remainers hate Britain but the people who want it to be weakened and people killed don't hate Britain and its people.
And I assume skideman will be here calling it an overreaction or project fear. This is what the government, NHS, affected businesses, and every expert are saying. The only people who aren't are the brexiteers who are, for some reason, getting European passports and moving their assets out. I wonder why?
if you actually believe this nonsense you should be on your soapbox about decommissioning field hospitals .. your not because your aware that its been one huge over reaction followed by another...we need to get back to saving lives.. not making insane sacrifices..
Wed Sep 09, 2020 1:47 pm
skidemin wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Jock wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:No need to worry, If you’re caught just say you were "breaking the law in a specific and limited way". If it’s acceptable for our good and honest government I’m sure us plebs will be fine
Idiotic comparison. Fekk the EU they want to punish and hurt our country. These anti covid measures are designed to protect the citizens of this country.
So if I disagree with a law and think breaking it could benefit me then I should be allowed to do it? Also don’t you think the fact our government are so willing and so openly breaking international law could set a dangerous precedent in the future?
The EU have already said they will IGNORE our borders and protected sea areas, IGNORE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SOVERIGN RIGHTS, and continue to plunder our fish stocks, so destroying the environment (even Greenpeace are on Boris's side in this), destroying even further our fishing fleets and communities, if we do not allow them to continue plundering, uncontrolled and take anything they want from OUR LEGAL INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The EU boast they will ignore international law when it suits them.
But they get all legal and law abiding virtue signalling when our Government brings in laws to protect UK business, reduce bureaucracy and implement internal sovereign laws, that will allow all 4 UK countries to freely trade without bureaucratic hinderance and actually transfers more power to the devolved administrations.
So what is wrong with the Tories sticking up for, and supporting the UK and its people and businesses? Only those with a hatred of Britain, its people and sovereign rights to manage itself would disagree. Unless of course they have a vested personal selfish interest in the EU and it's continued control and abuse of our freedoms.
So now it's the EUs fault that the tories can't arrange a border in Ireland? Don't think so.
Ah fishing, the big problem for the people who don't have a clue. 0.1% of our economy (beaten by woodwork and leather), employing fewer people than pound land, and we don't even eat the majority of food we catch... Good thing we're all prepared on our borders for quick movement of those fish. /s
With no deal (or if Boris collapses and accepts whatever they say) very likely and the country not prepared for brexit yet (as confirmed by the major businesses who use the ports) then the probability of food and medicine shortages is nigh on confirmed. Funny how you say remainers hate Britain but the people who want it to be weakened and people killed don't hate Britain and its people.
And I assume skideman will be here calling it an overreaction or project fear. This is what the government, NHS, affected businesses, and every expert are saying. The only people who aren't are the brexiteers who are, for some reason, getting European passports and moving their assets out. I wonder why?
Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:10 pm
glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:13 pm
WestCoastBlue wrote:llan bluebird wrote:To my recollection there were no increases in cases at those "mass" demo's.......Anyone disagree ?
We have spiked as all those who had to fly off to holiday hot spots to get their downtime returned and spread it around their community.
Its a socially transmitted virus, all those pictures of twenty-somethings dancing on cars in the med islands is why we are in these measures now, christ knows what Cardiff bay will do.
The Caerphilly rules are the daftest thing I have heard. If the government wants to save the hospitality industry its need to jettison the clubbing and late night element pretty quickly.
I agree with pubs closing at 10pm for a short period to try top dampen this down.
These new lock down measures are being determined by economics not public safety.
Gatherings which sustain business/jobs/taxes are allowed. Gatherings which do not benefit the economy are banned. Asking people not to see friends or family or socialise but asking them to work, go to shops, get on public transport shows the health of the nation isn’t a priority.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:41 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
'Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?' Why is it up to the UK to put up a UK border? Suppose that makes the 'control our borders' line more leave bollocks.
I'm not saying fishing doesn't matter but promoting something that makes up 0.1% of our economy to a huge issue is nonsensical. Brexit will damage loads of bigger industries but you're ignoring that. They won't be able tojust export the fish as they do now as we'll have massive queues. You do know why they're building huge lorry parks around the UK?
The majority of countries don't trade on wto terms. There are 135 non EU countries and 105 of them have some sort of deal. Why don't you name one which doesn't?
8 of the largest haulage firms have recently complained about how the ports aren't ready and the government hasn't given details but you blame them because their crystal ball can't tell if Johnsons oven ready deal was another lie (obviously it was).
Since the brexit vote emigration to the EU has increased. Brexiteers moving: Dyson, Stanley Johnson is getting passports for his family, farage has said he'll leave if brexit is bad, Jacob Rees mong has moved assets to Ireland... I think rats leaving a sinking ship is an adequate phrase.
Medicine and food shortages will happen with a no deal brexit. No one should be denying that. You can either listen to: the government (who did stockpile medicine recently for the original brexit deadline... Wonder why?), the NHS, businesses, and experts OR just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you weren't lied to.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:47 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:49 pm
Jock wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
'Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?' Why is it up to the UK to put up a UK border? Suppose that makes the 'control our borders' line more leave bollocks.
I'm not saying fishing doesn't matter but promoting something that makes up 0.1% of our economy to a huge issue is nonsensical. Brexit will damage loads of bigger industries but you're ignoring that. They won't be able tojust export the fish as they do now as we'll have massive queues. You do know why they're building huge lorry parks around the UK?
The majority of countries don't trade on wto terms. There are 135 non EU countries and 105 of them have some sort of deal. Why don't you name one which doesn't?
8 of the largest haulage firms have recently complained about how the ports aren't ready and the government hasn't given details but you blame them because their crystal ball can't tell if Johnsons oven ready deal was another lie (obviously it was).
Since the brexit vote emigration to the EU has increased. Brexiteers moving: Dyson, Stanley Johnson is getting passports for his family, farage has said he'll leave if brexit is bad, Jacob Rees mong has moved assets to Ireland... I think rats leaving a sinking ship is an adequate phrase.
Medicine and food shortages will happen with a no deal brexit. No one should be denying that. You can either listen to: the government (who did stockpile medicine recently for the original brexit deadline... Wonder why?), the NHS, businesses, and experts OR just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you weren't lied to.
We were told bodies will pile up on the street, we’ll run out of drinking water and bizarrely enough Dutch sperm for ivf. Wasn’t aware Farrage has said he’ll leave have you got a source for that?
Corbyn said if he got into power he’d “smash globalism, smash capitalism and smash the EU” there are plenty of trade deals to be cut outside the failing protectionist EU block. Personally I voted leave for my kids and grandkids, expecting short term pain for long term gain, what I didn’t anticipate was the absolute refusal of Remainiacs to accept a democratic vote from the British People.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 5:23 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
'Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?' Why is it up to the UK to put up a UK border? Suppose that makes the 'control our borders' line more leave bollocks.
I'm not saying fishing doesn't matter but promoting something that makes up 0.1% of our economy to a huge issue is nonsensical. Brexit will damage loads of bigger industries but you're ignoring that. They won't be able tojust export the fish as they do now as we'll have massive queues. You do know why they're building huge lorry parks around the UK?
The majority of countries don't trade on wto terms. There are 135 non EU countries and 105 of them have some sort of deal. Why don't you name one which doesn't?
8 of the largest haulage firms have recently complained about how the ports aren't ready and the government hasn't given details but you blame them because their crystal ball can't tell if Johnsons oven ready deal was another lie (obviously it was).
Since the brexit vote emigration to the EU has increased. Brexiteers moving: Dyson, Stanley Johnson is getting passports for his family, farage has said he'll leave if brexit is bad, Jacob Rees mong has moved assets to Ireland... I think rats leaving a sinking ship is an adequate phrase.
Medicine and food shortages will happen with a no deal brexit. No one should be denying that. You can either listen to: the government (who did stockpile medicine recently for the original brexit deadline... Wonder why?), the NHS, businesses, and experts OR just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you weren't lied to.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 5:39 pm
Jock wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
'Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?' Why is it up to the UK to put up a UK border? Suppose that makes the 'control our borders' line more leave bollocks.
I'm not saying fishing doesn't matter but promoting something that makes up 0.1% of our economy to a huge issue is nonsensical. Brexit will damage loads of bigger industries but you're ignoring that. They won't be able tojust export the fish as they do now as we'll have massive queues. You do know why they're building huge lorry parks around the UK?
The majority of countries don't trade on wto terms. There are 135 non EU countries and 105 of them have some sort of deal. Why don't you name one which doesn't?
8 of the largest haulage firms have recently complained about how the ports aren't ready and the government hasn't given details but you blame them because their crystal ball can't tell if Johnsons oven ready deal was another lie (obviously it was).
Since the brexit vote emigration to the EU has increased. Brexiteers moving: Dyson, Stanley Johnson is getting passports for his family, farage has said he'll leave if brexit is bad, Jacob Rees mong has moved assets to Ireland... I think rats leaving a sinking ship is an adequate phrase.
Medicine and food shortages will happen with a no deal brexit. No one should be denying that. You can either listen to: the government (who did stockpile medicine recently for the original brexit deadline... Wonder why?), the NHS, businesses, and experts OR just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you weren't lied to.
We were told bodies will pile up on the street, we’ll run out of drinking water and bizarrely enough Dutch sperm for ivf. Wasn’t aware Farrage has said he’ll leave have you got a source for that?
Corbyn said if he got into power he’d “smash globalism, smash capitalism and smash the EU” there are plenty of trade deals to be cut outside the failing protectionist EU block. Personally I voted leave for my kids and grandkids, expecting short term pain for long term gain, what I didn’t anticipate was the absolute refusal of Remainiacs to accept a democratic vote from the British People.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:08 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:36 pm
TopCat CCFC wrote:Round-up: UK PM's coronavirus briefing
Cases have risen sharply in recent weeks, especially among 17- to 21-year-olds
The rise is not limited to a few local areas but has been seen across the country
The PM said it was "time to act" and introduced new measures in England from Monday, including "the rule of six" to limit the number of people who can gather together
There will be exemptions, such as for weddings and funerals, as well as in gyms and restaurants, but fines will be introduced for all those who break the rules
Hospitality venues will be legally required to collect contact details from customers, or face fines
Johnson also confirmed the government was working on a "moonshot" mass testing plan for tests that can give results in less than 20 minutes
There will be a pilot on entertainment venues in Salford next month so people who test negative on the door can go and see shows
He hopes to roll this out nationally, but we will need to wait for the results.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:37 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:Jock wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:glas wrote:Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?
It is the EU and Ireland that want to maintain their protectionist borders and control everything going in and out of there.
If they want to stop items going into Ireland it is their problem, so their cost and their right to do that. It is not the UK saying put border controls and monitor imports/exports.
As for fish, tell the coastal communities whose lives depend on fishing that it does not matter. We used to have a thriving coastal community until the EU and it's Common Fisheries Policy destroyed it. The French take 6x what the UK do from the English Channel, in designated UK waters. If it is so insignificant and not important why are the EU demanding access to it? What about Greenpeace criticising the destruction of Special Protected Areas, located in UK waters, by EU Supertrawlers?
It is irrelevant if we do not eat the fish, as our fishermen can catch them and export them, so making a good living for our people and country. If they are not caught as there is no demand then the environment and fish stocks will improve.
Why wouldn't businesses be prepared to trade on WTO terms? Like the majority of the world currently do. Any good responsible intelligent businessman has made arrangements (as told to by the Government). This is not the incompetent bureaucratic public services, civil service, council, NHS etc we are talking about.
Holland gets a lot of medicines from this country and have already said they are worried we will not supply them. We on the other hand can trade with the rest of the world without the EU constraints and artificially overpricing of drugs, food, car parts etc.
I do not know any Brexiteers who have applied for EU passports, or any Remainers either for that matter, despite their crying, project fear etc and threats to do so. Even they know we will be better off as a free sovereign nation, making laws that benefit our country. I bet even those who have applied for EU passports have applied for a dual passport so they can come running back to the UK when things go wrong over there (as they will) or they need medical care or benefit handouts.
As for the completely stupid comment that people will starve or even die because of Brexit shows a weak uneducated character, and someone who obviously cannot function without being told what to do for themselves. This country survived for centuries without the "protection, support and health care" of the EU.
'Why is it up to the UK to put a border in Ireland?' Why is it up to the UK to put up a UK border? Suppose that makes the 'control our borders' line more leave bollocks.
I'm not saying fishing doesn't matter but promoting something that makes up 0.1% of our economy to a huge issue is nonsensical. Brexit will damage loads of bigger industries but you're ignoring that. They won't be able tojust export the fish as they do now as we'll have massive queues. You do know why they're building huge lorry parks around the UK?
The majority of countries don't trade on wto terms. There are 135 non EU countries and 105 of them have some sort of deal. Why don't you name one which doesn't?
8 of the largest haulage firms have recently complained about how the ports aren't ready and the government hasn't given details but you blame them because their crystal ball can't tell if Johnsons oven ready deal was another lie (obviously it was).
Since the brexit vote emigration to the EU has increased. Brexiteers moving: Dyson, Stanley Johnson is getting passports for his family, farage has said he'll leave if brexit is bad, Jacob Rees mong has moved assets to Ireland... I think rats leaving a sinking ship is an adequate phrase.
Medicine and food shortages will happen with a no deal brexit. No one should be denying that. You can either listen to: the government (who did stockpile medicine recently for the original brexit deadline... Wonder why?), the NHS, businesses, and experts OR just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you weren't lied to.
We were told bodies will pile up on the street, we’ll run out of drinking water and bizarrely enough Dutch sperm for ivf. Wasn’t aware Farrage has said he’ll leave have you got a source for that?
Corbyn said if he got into power he’d “smash globalism, smash capitalism and smash the EU” there are plenty of trade deals to be cut outside the failing protectionist EU block. Personally I voted leave for my kids and grandkids, expecting short term pain for long term gain, what I didn’t anticipate was the absolute refusal of Remainiacs to accept a democratic vote from the British People.
Don't remember the bodies claim but here's farage saying his claim: https://consent.yahoo.com/v2/collectCon ... 3c19852447
I assume you don't know of any countries who trade on wto terms then.
How long will this 'short term pain' be? What will it constitute? How much of it will YOU accept?
The ultimate form of democracy, a vague question on an advisory referendum with a tight result that has been taken to an extreme even though the people at the time said that would never happen and have been found out to have broken the law multiple times and lied about pretty much everything.
You might want to wait a few decades to have kids, your grand children might have a sporting chance by the time they're born.