Sun Aug 09, 2020 11:21 am
Sun Aug 09, 2020 1:49 pm
Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:33 pm
Sun Aug 09, 2020 8:30 pm
BlueVanman wrote:I wish people would just stop stating huge numbers of deaths without posting the complete picture. Brazil has a population of 212,718,936 which equates to 473 deaths per 1 million of population.
Thats considerably less than the Spain, the UK and Italy and guess what? They haven't locked down their Economy just like Sweden with 570 deaths per million of population, again less than Spain, UK and Italy.
Everyone please just start looking at the facts before posting doom and gloom stats, it all there in plain English to see and compare at https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
We are now over 5 months in, honestly hand on heart ask yourself has this warranted the huge amounts of fear and anxiety most have suffered over that time.
I would guess there are a couple of thousand on this board alone, how many of us actually know anyone without serious existing health problems or very old who has died of this?
This is out there, it can definitely be nasty for a small percentage of people but is what almost all of the World has done and Locked down correct? I am seriously starting to wonder.
The constant scaremongering with stats and slating of the UK's and other Countries handling of this is really starting to grate and get boring
Mon Aug 10, 2020 8:40 am
Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:34 am
skidemin wrote:BlueVanman wrote:I wish people would just stop stating huge numbers of deaths without posting the complete picture. Brazil has a population of 212,718,936 which equates to 473 deaths per 1 million of population.
Thats considerably less than the Spain, the UK and Italy and guess what? They haven't locked down their Economy just like Sweden with 570 deaths per million of population, again less than Spain, UK and Italy.
Everyone please just start looking at the facts before posting doom and gloom stats, it all there in plain English to see and compare at https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
We are now over 5 months in, honestly hand on heart ask yourself has this warranted the huge amounts of fear and anxiety most have suffered over that time.
I would guess there are a couple of thousand on this board alone, how many of us actually know anyone without serious existing health problems or very old who has died of this?
This is out there, it can definitely be nasty for a small percentage of people but is what almost all of the World has done and Locked down correct? I am seriously starting to wonder.
The constant scaremongering with stats and slating of the UK's and other Countries handling of this is really starting to grate and get boring
as i posted mate a death rate of 45% lower than ourselves....maybe they need one of those lock down things to catch up... if their daily deaths continues as it is today 124 and ours remains zero.. they will equal us sometime in November 2021...
the TV reports on Brazil are just flat out scaremongering again
Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:54 am
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:03 am
Capn Birds Eye wrote:Make your mind up, is it 50,000 deaths with COVID l-19 in them, or were they 50,000 deaths caused by COVID-19? You can’t say one sentence that they had COVID 19 and not confirm that it was the main cause of death, then immediately in the next sentence claim “COVID 19 killed 50,000 in 3 months”
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:16 am
wez1927 wrote:all the figures around the world are false and can't be compared as different countries count deaths different, its just a political tool to bash what ever agenda is going on in each country ,we won't know the truth figures for years
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:22 am
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:29 am
Foghorn 65 wrote:In work yesterday and a lady coughed near me then proceeded to apologise and felt obliged to tell me it was a fly in her throat and not covid related
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:51 am
Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:57 am
Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:24 am
piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:37 am
BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
I fully take on board what you are saying and respect your opinion but just to clarify that my personal views are not based on the boredom of lockdown and more to do with the real life figures and facts which are now available after 5 months of Covid-19.
From a personal perspective i was placed on the shielding list at the very start due to health issues and also have a special needs child so believe me when i say at the start i was not taking this likely, in-fact the exact opposite and at one point i was actually preparing my goodbyes and sorting out all my finances just in case the worst happened.
Now in hindsight with 3 teenage children who i cannot praise enough, who have all also confined themselves to the house like myself and forfeited the last 5 months of there lives to keep me and there sister safe all while their friends have carried on as normal has now left me feeling like we have definitely tackled this all wrong, not intentionally and i do not lay blame, like i say in hindsight.
I realise this has killed people, there is no doubt, i also understand more than most that this could really hit people bad even now but its all about perspective.
450 people die each day in the UK of Cancer and over 2500 people over 65, its tragic and terrible but we do not see these people dropping dead in the streets, do you know anyone today that has died of anything not just Covid?
Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:50 am
piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:18 pm
skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:41 pm
piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:48 pm
BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
But what about the thousands of deaths caused due to restrictions?
I fully understand your view point, i should because it has been mine for many months but this can also easily be flipped.
How would you feel if a family member or friend took their own life due to the coronavirus restrictions after losing their home, job, income etc, the only difference being this would much more likely be a younger adult who pre-covid had everything to live for and i feel that as this unfolds further this will be causing far more misery for families around the world than covid ever could.
I have spend 5 months watching this unfold, weighed up the stats, pros and cons and i am edging on giving my family their lives back as the alternative to me is starting to flag up as being far far worse.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:09 pm
piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:12 pm
piledriver64 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
But what about the thousands of deaths caused due to restrictions?
I fully understand your view point, i should because it has been mine for many months but this can also easily be flipped.
How would you feel if a family member or friend took their own life due to the coronavirus restrictions after losing their home, job, income etc, the only difference being this would much more likely be a younger adult who pre-covid had everything to live for and i feel that as this unfolds further this will be causing far more misery for families around the world than covid ever could.
I have spend 5 months watching this unfold, weighed up the stats, pros and cons and i am edging on giving my family their lives back as the alternative to me is starting to flag up as being far far worse.
Yep, this thread just demonstrates how difficult this situation is.
We've all outlined our positions based on our own experience of COVID-19 which is absolutely understandable.
I would probably have been in full agreement with you until my mate died and nobody could visit or even attend his funeral. It will be a long time before his family and friends (me included) come to terms with that and something I wouldn't wish on anyone.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:13 pm
BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
But what about the thousands of deaths caused due to restrictions?
I fully understand your view point, i should because it has been mine for many months but this can also easily be flipped.
How would you feel if a family member or friend took their own life due to the coronavirus restrictions after losing their home, job, income etc, the only difference being this would much more likely be a younger adult who pre-covid had everything to live for and i feel that as this unfolds further this will be causing far more misery for families around the world than covid ever could.
I have spend 5 months watching this unfold, weighed up the stats, pros and cons and i am edging on giving my family their lives back as the alternative to me is starting to flag up as being far far worse.
Yep, this thread just demonstrates how difficult this situation is.
We've all outlined our positions based on our own experience of COVID-19 which is absolutely understandable.
I would probably have been in full agreement with you until my mate died and nobody could visit or even attend his funeral. It will be a long time before his family and friends (me included) come to terms with that and something I wouldn't wish on anyone.
This i totally agree with and without doubt is by far my biggest fear, not for myself but to happen to someone i love. To have a family member, friend or God forbid a child go into hospital and not be able to be there with them is just unthinkable and beyond cruel.
My condolences for your friend, i can totally see how this would alter anyone's perspective.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:14 pm
BlueVanman wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
But what about the thousands of deaths caused due to restrictions?
I fully understand your view point, i should because it has been mine for many months but this can also easily be flipped.
How would you feel if a family member or friend took their own life due to the coronavirus restrictions after losing their home, job, income etc, the only difference being this would much more likely be a younger adult who pre-covid had everything to live for and i feel that as this unfolds further this will be causing far more misery for families around the world than covid ever could.
I have spend 5 months watching this unfold, weighed up the stats, pros and cons and i am edging on giving my family their lives back as the alternative to me is starting to flag up as being far far worse.
Yep, this thread just demonstrates how difficult this situation is.
We've all outlined our positions based on our own experience of COVID-19 which is absolutely understandable.
I would probably have been in full agreement with you until my mate died and nobody could visit or even attend his funeral. It will be a long time before his family and friends (me included) come to terms with that and something I wouldn't wish on anyone.
This i totally agree with and without doubt is by far my biggest fear, not for myself but to happen to someone i love. To have a family member, friend or God forbid a child go into hospital and not be able to be there with them is just unthinkable and beyond cruel.
My condolences for your friend, i can understand how this would alter anyone's perspective.
Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:30 pm
BlueVanman wrote:BlueVanman wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:piledriver64 wrote:skidemin wrote:piledriver64 wrote:I think in general, clearly, this virus doesn't cause the damage that a lot of reports would claim.
However, what is undeniable is that those with existing health conditions, and/or are elderly, face a very real prospect of death. So all those of you saying "bring it on" would you do so if you had elderly parents, relatives at risk, etc. that you could pass it on to ?
You might well be right that if you got it it's just like a dose of flu. I've had a 24 year old family member get it and he was fine within about 10 days. I also lost a very close friend who was just 55.
I only say this as people are tending to be fed up with the restrictions (I know I am and have posted previously of my frustrations !) but they are there for a reason; to protect those that are in the risk categories, for those people it really is life or death.
We can afford to loosen restrictions at the moment because of the low rate of infection currently in the community, but if it rises again we need to act a lot more quickly than the UK government did in March !!
its not so much..bring it on..as have some perspective... yes it effects the old with existing illnesses more.. but the old and weak are also harder hit by things like the common cold than fit 30 odd year olds..its life..
life or death gets used way to much... as things stand its killed roughly 1 person in 1500 in the uk... so in a small village of 1500 where you would normally expect 14/15 deaths this year.. maybe covid has increased it by ONE.... i say maybe because there is a very good chance that the one might have been one of the 14/15 who would have died a bit later in the year anyway...
I don't disagree with any of those facts or comparisons. However, if that one person was a close relative/friend and their death could have ben avoided if people had fully complied with restrictions I think you would feel differently whether they were going to die shortly in any event or not.
Just my perspective. If death can be avoided why wouldn't you !!?? Not least because you can't even say goodbye under COVID-19 restrictions.
But what about the thousands of deaths caused due to restrictions?
I fully understand your view point, i should because it has been mine for many months but this can also easily be flipped.
How would you feel if a family member or friend took their own life due to the coronavirus restrictions after losing their home, job, income etc, the only difference being this would much more likely be a younger adult who pre-covid had everything to live for and i feel that as this unfolds further this will be causing far more misery for families around the world than covid ever could.
I have spend 5 months watching this unfold, weighed up the stats, pros and cons and i am edging on giving my family their lives back as the alternative to me is starting to flag up as being far far worse.
Yep, this thread just demonstrates how difficult this situation is.
We've all outlined our positions based on our own experience of COVID-19 which is absolutely understandable.
I would probably have been in full agreement with you until my mate died and nobody could visit or even attend his funeral. It will be a long time before his family and friends (me included) come to terms with that and something I wouldn't wish on anyone.
This i totally agree with and without doubt is by far my biggest fear, not for myself but to happen to someone i love. To have a family member, friend or God forbid a child go into hospital and not be able to be there with them is just unthinkable and beyond cruel.
My condolences for your friend, i can understand how this would alter anyone's perspective.