We would have stayed up?
Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:41 pm
We were relegated with 36 points from the Premier League last season. Villa stayed up with 35!
Re: We would have stayed up?
Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:01 pm
bluebird58 wrote:We were relegated with 36 points from the Premier League last season. Villa stayed up with 35!
I think we were relegated with 34 points.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:03 pm
They got lucky with decisions.
Should have lost at Sheffield United but the goal line technology didn't work.
We conceded a goal that was a mile offside which cost us probably a win and certainly a draw.
Should have lost at Sheffield United but the goal line technology didn't work.
We conceded a goal that was a mile offside which cost us probably a win and certainly a draw.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:03 am
bluebird58 wrote:We were relegated with 36 points from the Premier League last season. Villa stayed up with 35!
You were relegated with 34 points.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:27 am
36 points is the real 40 points TBH. 40 points is a myth that some of the media still like to propagate.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:00 am
bluebird58 wrote:We were relegated with 36 points from the Premier League last season. Villa stayed up with 35!
You were relegated because you had the least points in the division, irrespective how many there was.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:25 am
You were relegated because you had the least points in the division, irrespective how many there was.[/quote]
This is incorrect.
This is incorrect.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:01 am
Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:31 pm
JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:50 pm
YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
You are correct here but not when you said we had the least points in the division.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:36 pm
Just to please our ever nose poking jack friends we probably wouldn't have won at man u had there been something on it as they wouldn't have given their youth a chance that day. However does any of this really matter?
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:37 pm
YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
Nothing to be confused about. Watford and Bournemouth had 34 points. If our goal difference was better we would have stayed up.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:11 pm
Welshman in CA wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
You are correct here but not when you said we had the least points in the division.
I didn’t say you had the least points in the division. Not once.
Re: We would have stayed up?
Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:49 pm
YDdraigGwyn wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
You are correct here but not when you said we had the least points in the division.
I didn’t say you had the least points in the division. Not once.
problem is all you jacks look the same..
Re: We would have stayed up?
Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:31 am
skidemin wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
You are correct here but not when you said we had the least points in the division.
I didn’t say you had the least points in the division. Not once.
problem is all you jacks look the same..
Right...
Re: We would have stayed up?
Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:36 am
See that Swansea must have won a game as filth have crawled out from under their rocks.
Not you Roathy, you're always here
Not you Roathy, you're always here
Re: We would have stayed up?
Tue Jul 28, 2020 8:43 am
JulesK wrote:See that Swansea must have won a game as filth have crawled out from under their rocks.
Not you Roathy, you're always here
Re: We would have stayed up?
Thu Jul 30, 2020 7:54 am
skidemin wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:YDdraigGwyn wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Think we would have been relegated on goal difference. Not bad when some so called experts had us to go down with a record low.
You went down with 34 points? I’m unsure why everyone is so confused by this.
You wouldn’t have stayed up with 34 points.
You are correct here but not when you said we had the least points in the division.
I didn’t say you had the least points in the division. Not once.
problem is all you jacks look the same..
