VOTE " MOTM v Nottingham Forest (h) "

48 hours to vote

None of them...,,

Fans for turning up

Will vaulks only player who was decent tonight

None of them.

Glatzel

Glatzel

Smithies kept us in it with 3 or 4 brilliant saves again

Glatzel works hard but was poor not sure why people are voting just because hes a trier

Without Smithies we would have been hammered!

Vaulks

Sorry guys, i am seriously not taking the piss, but what did Glatzel do that you not only thought he is a professional footballer but made you think he was our best player ?

I saw a clumsy, low technical ability, weak as a kitten with little aggression shell of a player that offers very little

Vaulks for me (again)

Vaulks and glatzel were decent the latter getting my vote. Paterson, Bennett must be dropped.

Tomlin

Sorry guys, i am seriously not taking the piss, but what did Glatzel do that you not only thought he is a professional footballer but made you think he was our best player ?

I saw a clumsy, low technical ability, weak as a kitten with little aggression shell of a player that offers very little

Vaulks for me (again)

The team is full of players with no vision to put Glatzel, or any other forward in on goal! Tomlin is the only one we have,its shocking really,that none of this squad of Warnock's, is able to step in his shoes!

Sorry guys, i am seriously not taking the piss, but what did Glatzel do that you not only thought he is a professional footballer but made you think he was our best player ?

I saw a clumsy, low technical ability, weak as a kitten with little aggression shell of a player that offers very little

Vaulks for me (again)

agree on glatzel...not least of all for that awful 20 yard shot when we had two men spare to his right. but his all round game.. waw MOM?
Vaulks btw had no idea where his man was for their goal. its not just about running in the correct direction.. wasn't just that occasion he lost his man but that's the important one..

Sorry guys, i am seriously not taking the piss, but what did Glatzel do that you not only thought he is a professional footballer but made you think he was our best player ?

I saw a clumsy, low technical ability, weak as a kitten with little aggression shell of a player that offers very little

Vaulks for me (again)

agree on glatzel...not least of all for that awful 20 yard shot when we had two men spare to his right. but his all round game.. waw MOM?
Vaulks btw had no idea where his man was for their goal. its not just about running in the correct direction.. wasn't just that occasion he lost his man but that's the important one..

Thought Glatzel did well with holding up the ball and holding off the defenders bringing it forward, he just seemed to lack the quality and decision making as he went forward, not picking the right pass etc, Thought Sanderson was probably the best player for us seems to go forward often and linked well with Hoilett

Me for good judgement. I stayed at home and watched it on TV

Sorry guys, i am seriously not taking the piss, but what did Glatzel do that you not only thought he is a professional footballer but made you think he was our best player ?

I saw a clumsy, low technical ability, weak as a kitten with little aggression shell of a player that offers very little

Vaulks for me (again)

Absolutely bang on !
Could not agree any more, you've hit the nail on the head with the lack of technical skills and no strength comments.