VOTE " MOTM v Reading (a) "

48 hours to vote.

Paterson

Will Vaulks for me

A decent game and needs some encouragement, as I think he could yet be a useful player for City

Paterson vaulks torn

Vaulks and Ralls looked promising then Pack came on So Will for me

Will for me.

Will Vaulks for me but the question is who voted for Josh no balls Murphy

Will Vaulks for me but the question is who voted for Josh no balls Murphy

Josh Murphy did

Will Vaulks for me but the question is who voted for Josh no balls Murphy

Josh Murphy did

He was worse than awful I never seen such a fairy of a player amount times he ran the ball out touch

Went for vaulks 1st
Wyhte glatzel patterson in that order
Still dont know how bamba missed that sitter

Literally haven’t heard from anybody who went to the game that Glatzel offered anything.

Literally haven’t heard from anybody who went to the game that Glatzel offered anything.

im not a fan but today was probably his best game

Went for vaulks 1st
Wyhte glatzel patterson in that order
Still dont know how bamba missed that sitter

Wouldn’t disagree with that but starting to wonder whether Whyte has the quality as an more of an attacking threat. Murphy should deffo check out his work ethic though

Murphy needs to leave this club the guy has no bottle, no heart and little end product.

Murphy needs to leave this club the guy has no bottle, no heart and little end product.

well he defo has talent.. someone needs to be telling him if he isn't happy that the best way out is to put his head down , rip the division a new one and get a few offers in..

Vaulks gave us an energy that we have been missing all season.

Will Vaulks for me

A decent game and needs some encouragement, as I think he could yet be a useful player for City

Totally agree. He looked very tidy.

I said I wanted to Vaulks to stay in another thread and a few fans called him garbage... he is a very useful player and shame others can’t be as supportive

I said I wanted to Vaulks to stay in another thread and a few fans called him garbage... he is a very useful player and shame others can’t be as supportive

For once I agree with you.

Very quickly players can become a scapegoat without receiving a proper chance.

Murphy needs to leave this club the guy has no bottle, no heart and little end product.

Hes sooo lazy yesterday annoyed hell out of me he has talent but next to no end product

Will Vaulks for me

A decent game and needs some encouragement, as I think he could yet be a useful player for City

Agreed with you here Sven... as I posted elsewhere he is a good player

I said I wanted to Vaulks to stay in another thread and a few fans called him garbage... he is a very useful player and shame others can’t be as supportive

For once I agree with you.

Very quickly players can become a scapegoat without receiving a proper chance.

Shit me too! But managers too get scapegoated without being given a proper chance too,eh barry but Vaulks is starting to show his worth lately,long may it continue

Will Vaulks for me

A decent game and needs some encouragement, as I think he could yet be a useful player for City

Agreed with you here Sven... as I posted elsewhere he is a good player

Wow,are we witnessing a mellowing down here an agreement between foes only kidding! I think Vaulks was at his best to date,now let's hope he settles in the same vein,definitely gave us an energy that's been missing,and looking back to that drubbing at QPR, he can certainly strike the ball well,long may he continue to improve

Will Vaulks for me

A decent game and needs some encouragement, as I think he could yet be a useful player for City

Agreed with you here Sven... as I posted elsewhere he is a good player

Wow,are we witnessing a mellowing down here an agreement between foes only kidding! I think Vaulks was at his best to date,now let's hope he settles in the same vein,definitely gave us an energy that's been missing,and looking back to that drubbing at QPR, he can certainly strike the ball well,long may he continue to improve