Lee Gregory

Surely we can look at finding a better striker than Lee Gregory, because hes isn't better than anyone currently in the squad

Beg to differ mate.Against Madine and Kiefer Moore his stats look very good.A cheap option on an 2yr contract sounds good to me.

Beg to differ mate.Against Madine and Kiefer Moore his stats look very good.A cheap option on an 2yr contract sounds good to me.

Agreed, plus Harris has managed him before and will know his capabilities. It’s a short term signing that carries a lot less risk than some of the others mentioned.

Again lack of pace

We are such a slow team - We need to put some pace into this squad

Beg to differ mate.Against Madine and Kiefer Moore his stats look very good.A cheap option on an 2yr contract sounds good to me.

Agreed, plus Harris has managed him before and will know his capabilities. It’s a short term signing that carries a lot less risk than some of the others mentioned.

what makes you think it will be a short term signing ?

Again lack of pace

We are such a slow team - We need to put some pace into this squad

Gregory is quicker than we got now

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

We already have too many strikers on our books why we would want to sign another old average player is beyond me.

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

31 is nothing still.got a good 3-4 years in him physically

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

31 is nothing still.got a good 3-4 years in him physically

iits a maybe, some are at their peak at 30/31 others are more or less done, look at Ledley ..

anyway....all ive read today is .loads of hungry kids ..sort your head out and offer some free chips if its going to be the make or break on getting them here..

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

31 is nothing still.got a good 3-4 years in him physically

iits a maybe, some are at their peak at 30/31 others are more or less done, look at Ledley ..

anyway....all ive read today is .loads of hungry kids ..sort your head out and offer some free chips if its going to be the make or break on getting them here..

no fish and chips we want him in peak condition, hes getting on a bot he could come in and score a hat full tho

Depends on the fee Stoke are looking for and what wages a 31 year old expects.

We certainly don't want to be giving him a two year contract at that age or paying a big fee for him.

If he costs £100,000 or less and accepts £5000 a week on a one year contract with big bonuses for goals scored he may be worth a punt.

Otherwise it's just throwing money away yet again.

We already have too many strikers on our books why we would want to sign another old average player is beyond me.

Because he’d still be more effective than Glatzel

Begs the question why are stoke willing to get rid of a player that was only signed in June?

Given his brace, should we chuck flint up top?!

he's actually a winger, who i am sure was pushed to play the number 9 at millwall because they had no strikers available, and he scored a few goals, but wasn't prolific. which earned him a move to stoke.

if thats the case, id rather see us play murphy as a number 9, his pace and tomlin knocking balls through, might be more effective there than he is as our winger

Beg to differ mate.Against Madine and Kiefer Moore his stats look very good.A cheap option on an 2yr contract sounds good to me.

Agreed, plus Harris has managed him before and will know his capabilities. It’s a short term signing that carries a lot less risk than some of the others mentioned.

what makes you think it will be a short term signing ?

His age !

At 31/32 he's only got 18-24 months left at this level at best.

Beg to differ mate.Against Madine and Kiefer Moore his stats look very good.A cheap option on an 2yr contract sounds good to me.

Agreed, plus Harris has managed him before and will know his capabilities. It’s a short term signing that carries a lot less risk than some of the others mentioned.

what makes you think it will be a short term signing ?

His age !

At 31/32 he's only got 18-24 months left at this level at best.

Probably be given a five year contract with an option of a sixth with they way we do things

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

31 is nothing still.got a good 3-4 years in him physically

iits a maybe, some are at their peak at 30/31 others are more or less done, look at Ledley ..

anyway....all ive read today is .loads of hungry kids ..sort your head out and offer some free chips if its going to be the make or break on getting them here..

Last thing you want is to sign a player with a full stomach.

31 tho - I know its not old but I'd rather look at some hungry youngsters

31 is nothing still.got a good 3-4 years in him physically

iits a maybe, some are at their peak at 30/31 others are more or less done, look at Ledley ..

anyway....all ive read today is .loads of hungry kids ..sort your head out and offer some free chips if its going to be the make or break on getting them here..

Last thing you want is to sign a player with a full stomach.

yep.. unbelievably some players would deliberately soak a ball to practice with...