ITV news. Females only?

What's going on? That bloke in charge Jonathan Hills only interviewing and allowing ladies on his show? Kylie the "newscaster", Ruth the weather girl, sports presenter err...dunno her name. Where's the blokes with triple Welsh names...Arfon Haines Davies, Dilwyn Young Jones...

What's going on? That bloke in charge Jonathan Hills only interviewing and allowing ladies on his show? Kylie the "newscaster", Ruth the weather girl, sports presenter err...dunno her name. Where's the blokes with triple Welsh names...Arfon Haines Davies, Dilwyn Young Jones...

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called
sexual equality if all female ?

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

Actually it goes back to stone age Male sexism if want to be factual.. but in modern times it is called equality! But like said if had an all Male interview panel ect ect it be called sexism, but have all female panel it will be ok and certainly would not be called
sexist.. two wrongs never made a right did it?

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

You're just replacing one inequality with another, its very hypocritical and not how equality works.

Who cares. The females are far easier on the eyes

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

***In David Attenborough's voice***

Ahh the male feminist...

A poor inadequate species that despite its strong shows of empathy and soft coos that closely mimic that of the dominant female, invariably gets shunned and ostracized by both the males and females in the pack just for being a bit of a soppy wet lettuce...

Sorry Wayne couldn't resist it.

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

You're just replacing one inequality with another, its very hypocritical and not how equality works.

I hate it when people dont put out full post! My reply was highlighting if good for women
should be good for men? but the response here doesn't include the post i was replying to so a bit lopsided view..

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

***In David Attenborough's voice***

Ahh the male feminist...

A poor inadequate species that despite its strong shows of empathy and soft coos that closely mimic that of the dominant female, invariably gets shunned and ostracized by both the males and females in the pack just for being a bit of a soppy wet lettuce...

Sorry Wayne couldn't resist it.

Lol

Who cares. The females are far easier on the eyes

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

This pointless infatuation with equality is actually going to kill the West, through lowering birth rates of feminists to feminists then voting for mass immigration. I can't for the life of me understand why any man wants women in charge after 100.000s of years of men having a certain role. Do people promote equality to appear enlightened?
A very dangerous game to play that will end very nastily, and eventually it'll be strong men risking their lives to clean this mess up. Not the women who pushed for it.

Maybe it’s just called best person for the job

Look up The "Frankfurt School of Western Subversion"

Feminists are more of a proxy warrior being used by marxists(Communists) to destroy the traditional order of the West. Only women don't realise this and think they're fighting the good fight.

Same with the LGBTQ movement, immigrants, etc etc. eventually, by harnessing, exaggerating and exploiting a minority groups small gripe with the patriarchal system. The communists will eventually have the numbers to topple Western man. Then erect global Communism which has been a dream of Jewish intellectuals ever since they violently over threw the Christian royal family in Russia during the bolshevik revolution which ked to communism. 60 million murdered from that. Mainly Christians and intellectuals who were seen as a threat to their dictatorship. The bolshevik revolution saw foriegn jews funded by Jewish international bankers, violently over throw the Russians, they confiscated all private property then installed the murderous gulags to systematically murder any dissidenting voices. Before then agitating for exspansionist conflict to the West. They saw the taking of Poland and Germany as the spring board to global Communism.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

[

Didn't you know its sexist to have only all Male staff! but its called sexual equality if all female ?

WRONG.

It's called rebalancing hundreds of f*cking years of inequality.

FFS

Regarding commentators and guests, if I'm watching the mens game i want to here analysis from Men who have played at that level not a women who is no more than a fan.
If I'm watching the womens games I want to here the analysis from women who have played it not a man who is no more than a fan.

Guest commentators every now and again is fine but it's getting out of hand and everyone is too scared to look either sexist or racist so the tv companies now go out of there way to have a panel consisting of one white guy, one black guy, one women and somebody who is gay just to keep people happy even if they are shit at the job. Its pathetic.

Regarding commentators and guests, if I'm watching the mens game i want to here analysis from Men who have played at that level not a women who is no more than a fan.
If I'm watching the womens games I want to here the analysis from women who have played it not a man who is no more than a fan.

Guest commentators every now and again is fine but it's getting out of hand and everyone is too scared to look either sexist or racist so the tv companies now go out of there way to have a panel consisting of one white guy, one black guy, one women and somebody who is gay just to keep people happy even if they are shit at the job. Its pathetic.

For once I totally agree with you. I can't watch Football Focus, Final Score, MOTD or any other football programme with women giving analysis, commentating or on the panel.
Women have their own game and I've no problem with that or women at a live game, but women like Alex Scott telling us about what its like to be playing top league football argh.
Its BBC and the rest doing the PC thing and as you say Thomas, its pathetic.

This conversation is far too intellectual for me