Will Vaulks

How did he do today? Think he was treated poorly by NW after the Reading game so it’s been good seeing him around the first team again recently.

Interesting how a what we assume a not fully fit Ralls got in along with Vaulks ahead of Bacuna.

I sense Harris likes Vaulks, seems to be more involved and used.

How did he do today? Think he was treated poorly by NW after the Reading game so it’s been good seeing him around the first team again recently.

very poorly....i never understood dropping players who have nightmares either..

How did he do today? Think he was treated poorly by NW after the Reading game so it’s been good seeing him around the first team again recently.

very poorly....i never understood dropping players who have nightmares either..

Warnock had worked with him before aswell, so he knows what hes like as a player which makes it even more confusing why he then left him out completely. Purchases/decisions like this sat very uneasy with the board and I can see why.

How did he do today? Think he was treated poorly by NW after the Reading game so it’s been good seeing him around the first team again recently.

very poorly....i never understood dropping players who have nightmares either..

Warnock had worked with him before aswell, so he knows what hes like as a player which makes it even more confusing why he then left him out completely. Purchases/decisions like this sat very uneasy with the board and I can see why.

Vaulks was not at Rotherham when NW was there.. I know they do not sit easy. its as if Cardiff fans pay zero attention to what happens with other clubs/managers/transfers or know what a squad player is.....even when there were loads of stats put up by all sorts of sources last season regarding transfers and value for money that were the exact opposite to whats said on here . but Vaulks ...played at Reading due to circumstance didn't exactly make himself indisposable and then was mostly an un used sub..its hardly as if he was banished to the under23s just deemed not good enough to start , or needed to come on. this could happen again...if it does it really wont mean he is being treated unfairly or the manager has favourites...

i never really understood the Vaulks signing. i always felt NW bought him as cover, but never thought he would be good enough to step in over Bacuna.

i never really understood the Vaulks signing. i always felt NW bought him as cover, but never thought he would be good enough to step in over Bacuna.

I dont think he planned on getting Pack.

i never really understood the Vaulks signing. i always felt NW bought him as cover, but never thought he would be good enough to step in over Bacuna.

I dont think he planned on getting Pack.

i get the pack deal was well after the Vaulks signing. but when he signed Bacuna he said, he's my replacement for Gunners, and then when he signed Vaulks he said the exact same thing. i think he bought him to be a squad filler, because i dont think anyone seen him as a starter

i never really understood the Vaulks signing. i always felt NW bought him as cover, but never thought he would be good enough to step in over Bacuna.

I thought the same. we were losing camarasa , arter and gunner..so needed bodies in..

Bacuna has been great. Pack has been mostly reliable. Ralls is obviously one of our better players.

I honestly don't think Vaulks is at the same standard of those three. Still find it strange he gets in the Wales squad.