ealing_ayatollah wrote:There was a decent debate on here a little while back around Greta Thunberg and quite a few people, myself included, questioned the underlying reason behind why she was pushed so prominently.
She recently penned an article on Project Syndicate's website that I think may have given some credence to the argument that 'Climate Justice' is merely a tool being used to usher in a globalist, progressive, authoritarian political movement.
Greta wrote
"After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them all."
It's all very similar to how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted the US Green New deal was also nothing about climate change (which it was absolutely initially positioned as being) but more about overhauling the whole economy, i.e. it was about wealth distribution.
The science on climate change is far from settled and the debate is being shut down by highly emotive language and Greta is the Marxist wolf in an environmentalist sheep's clothing.
Nuke's got shot down for comparing the promotion of her as some kind of beacon for the future to Nazi propaganda which also used innocent-looking children. Yet it seems that there is certainly more to her words than a concerned environmentalist.
A phrase "like colonial, racist and patriarchal systems of oppression" is purely progressive ideological rhetoric and has nothing to do with the environmental concerns she rose to prominence championing.
I think the mask might just have slipped and here we are seeing the real reason behind the angry Swedish school girl's push towards global stardom. But then I'm just a tin foil hat wearing monkey with a penchant for fine bananas, so what would I know.
Sources -
Greta's article https://www.project-syndicate.org/comme ... al-2019-11
Saikat Chakrabarti admission on Green New deal - https://news.yahoo.com/aoc-chief-staff- ... 08358.html
splottthedog wrote:How dare she object to our Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression!
splottthedog wrote:How dare she object to our Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression!
welshrarebit wrote:I honestly don't think she "said" that. Obviously in the literal sense she did. But whilst I'm not her number 1 fan I do believe she passionately believes in climate change and hasn't had much mission creep.
The people behind her however .....
dogfound wrote:welshrarebit wrote:I honestly don't think she "said" that. Obviously in the literal sense she did. But whilst I'm not her number 1 fan I do believe she passionately believes in climate change and hasn't had much mission creep.
The people behind her however .....
she probably does passionately believe , but how much of that has come from living with people who passionately believe in climate change plus.
rumpo kid wrote:Blow all that..
The big question on everybodys lips is..Is ealing a tin foil monkey wearing a hat, or a monkey wearing a tin foil hat?
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:As a supplemental , the Governor of the Bank of England (appointed by arch-Globalist tw*t George Osborne) -Mark Carney is heading to the UN as the Climate Envoy to continue with the 'good work' of his fellow Canadian Maurice Strong. They are not 'nice guys.'In fact most of these people are total sociopaths who would rub us out as soon as look at us.
James Matkin, at Academia.edu noted: 'The man who invented climate change was not a scientist, he was rather a big government ideologue and socialist. The Father of Climate Change is Maurice Strong, a Canadian multimillionaire passionate about the environment and the role of the United Nations,not in science but in wealth distribution. As a result Strong skilfully taped on weak climate change science attacking fossil fuels to form the leverage for a new world government.
From the start and continuing today the UN IPCC is ok with the pseudo-science of demonizing life giving CO2 ,which has“nothing to do with the environment” because this is the road to global wealth redistribution. I am not making this up as these are the words of Dr. Ottmar Endenhoffer - leading German scientist and IPCC co-chair.'
Article on said sociopath:
https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-maur ... mentalist/
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:As a supplemental , the Governor of the Bank of England (appointed by arch-Globalist tw*t George Osborne) -Mark Carney is heading to the UN as the Climate Envoy to continue with the 'good work' of his fellow Canadian Maurice Strong. They are not 'nice guys.'In fact most of these people are total sociopaths who would rub us out as soon as look at us.
James Matkin, at Academia.edu noted: 'The man who invented climate change was not a scientist, he was rather a big government ideologue and socialist. The Father of Climate Change is Maurice Strong, a Canadian multimillionaire passionate about the environment and the role of the United Nations,not in science but in wealth distribution. As a result Strong skilfully taped on weak climate change science attacking fossil fuels to form the leverage for a new world government.
From the start and continuing today the UN IPCC is ok with the pseudo-science of demonizing life giving CO2 ,which has“nothing to do with the environment” because this is the road to global wealth redistribution. I am not making this up as these are the words of Dr. Ottmar Endenhoffer - leading German scientist and IPCC co-chair.'
Article on said sociopath:
https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-maur ... mentalist/
pembroke allan wrote:dogfound wrote:welshrarebit wrote:I honestly don't think she "said" that. Obviously in the literal sense she did. But whilst I'm not her number 1 fan I do believe she passionately believes in climate change and hasn't had much mission creep.
The people behind her however .....
she probably does passionately believe , but how much of that has come from living with people who passionately believe in climate change plus.
Her mother travelled the world before greta put her foot down and stopped her..so hardly climate orientated her mother at least guess father stayed at home...
dogfound wrote:pembroke allan wrote:dogfound wrote:welshrarebit wrote:I honestly don't think she "said" that. Obviously in the literal sense she did. But whilst I'm not her number 1 fan I do believe she passionately believes in climate change and hasn't had much mission creep.
The people behind her however .....
she probably does passionately believe , but how much of that has come from living with people who passionately believe in climate change plus.
Her mother travelled the world before greta put her foot down and stopped her..so hardly climate orientated her mother at least guess father stayed at home...
yes this travelling the world while preaching climate change is very popular.. the fact 6 people are flying the atlantic to sail her home shows how much real thought goes into it.
JulesK wrote:Rees I believe she also has other issues but that still doesn't get away from the bigger picture of a CHILD being used for unproven science!
We all know the planet is messed up but still nothing is said by the EU about Germany or Poland's coal output and subsidies so will anything be done after the Madrid conference ( which the world's leader mostly FLEW to )?
JulesK wrote:I sometimes feeel sorry for this young child who has been stuck on the climate pedestal by her parents when they knew she has mental issues ( seems like everyone has these days ) instead of being able to enjoy childhood.
Then when I see her snarling and blaming us older generation I think about all the stuff youngsters use today, don't they know where all the power for their gadgets come from? All the rubbish from fast food places goes? The traveling most do a lot more than we used to? The school run ( think most of us used to walk ( walk !! Is that a swear word )?
So I ask myself, Is she just brainwashed or a hypocrite of the highest order.?
JulesK wrote:I sometimes feeel sorry for this young child who has been stuck on the climate pedestal by her parents when they knew she has mental issues ( seems like everyone has these days ) instead of being able to enjoy childhood.
Then when I see her snarling and blaming us older generation I think about all the stuff youngsters use today, don't they know where all the power for their gadgets come from? All the rubbish from fast food places goes? The traveling most do a lot more than we used to? The school run ( think most of us used to walk ( walk !! Is that a swear word )?
So I ask myself, Is she just brainwashed or a hypocrite of the highest order.?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 140 guests