Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:08 am
Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:39 am
Proud Jack wrote:Would you like to congratulate us on our passion and good football compared to your lifeless and hoofball football
Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:14 am
Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:51 am
Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:26 am
Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:26 am
Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:02 am
Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:14 am
Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:25 am
pembroke allan wrote:Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
We were extremely bad on Sunday that's it! As for winning by 3 that's impressive with 5 shots on target which doesn't mean they were chances just they reached the goalie!and as been said you were not great either as previous 4 matches showed, we made you look good is more to point, in fact make an under 11 team look good we were so bad
Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:31 am
Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:21 pm
Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:43 pm
Proud Jack wrote:Would you like to congratulate us on our passion and good football compared to your lifeless and hoofball football
Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:54 pm
Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:57 pm
Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:37 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Proud Jack wrote:You lot make me laugh
If we were nothing special how bad are you![]()
We could of won by at least three
We were extremely bad on Sunday that's it! As for winning by 3 that's impressive with 5 shots on target which doesn't mean they were chances just they reached the goalie!and as been said you were not great either as previous 4 matches showed, we made you look good is more to point, in fact make an under 11 team look good we were so bad
In a nutshell. It’s not sour grapes either, if you think you were superb then that’s up to you mate. Your opinion.
Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:26 pm
Proud Jack wrote:Would you like to congratulate us on our passion and good football compared to your lifeless and hoofball football
Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:47 pm
Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:31 pm
RV Casual wrote:It's another multi lads, might not be roathy but 100% multi, just ignore.
Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:51 pm
Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:05 am
Vinnie wrote:Some are kidding themselves here for whatever reason, maybe being blinded by the scoreboard.
Swansea were completely dominant. Slick passing, dealt with the aerial balls well, created a heap of chances. The only department that disappointed was the finishing of those chances. But in terms of team performance as a whole, Swansea were very good. Ayew is something else.
Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:08 am
Fri Nov 01, 2019 8:12 am
Vinnie wrote:Wouldn't go that far, but they dominated the game in every department apart from the finishing.
They looked like a team in their position which is 4th in the second division. Depends what your reference point is I suppose.
Were they as good as Real Madrid? Of course not. Were they good for the Championship? Certainly. Not sure what else they could have done really, apart from stuck away a couple more of their chances.
Fri Nov 01, 2019 9:26 am
dogfound wrote:Vinnie wrote:Some are kidding themselves here for whatever reason, maybe being blinded by the scoreboard.
Swansea were completely dominant. Slick passing, dealt with the aerial balls well, created a heap of chances. The only department that disappointed was the finishing of those chances. But in terms of team performance as a whole, Swansea were very good. Ayew is something else.
yep they were like Barca without Messi
Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:53 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Personally I think we’d probably have beaten them if we’d been able to put out the side we had v Millwall. That doesn’t make them that great.
Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:09 am
Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:41 am
Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:57 am
Vinnie wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Personally I think we’d probably have beaten them if we’d been able to put out the side we had v Millwall. That doesn’t make them that great.
Doesn’t make it true either![]()
Seemed a much bigger gulf than a player or two.
Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:01 pm
Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:15 pm
dogfound wrote:Vinnie wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Personally I think we’d probably have beaten them if we’d been able to put out the side we had v Millwall. That doesn’t make them that great.
Doesn’t make it true either![]()
Seemed a much bigger gulf than a player or two.
different styles mate. if youd ever kicked a ball you would know
Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:44 pm
Vinnie wrote:dogfound wrote:Vinnie wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Personally I think we’d probably have beaten them if we’d been able to put out the side we had v Millwall. That doesn’t make them that great.
Doesn’t make it true either![]()
Seemed a much bigger gulf than a player or two.
different styles mate. if youd ever kicked a ball you would know
He didn’t say change the style, he said if the team was the same as Millwall. That’s Hoilett and Tomlin.
The only dangerous moments (if you can call them that) came from Mendez Laing, so I don’t see how replacing him like for like would have altered the way the game went. Which of course would also mean 1 up front and not 2 with Tomlin instead of Glatzel. Tomlin is not the most mobile at the best of times and is all sorts of wrong to be starting a game like that.
As I said, it seemed far more of a gulf than a player or two. If that side couldn’t beat 15th in the league away, then how do you expect they would beat 4th in the league away in a game they completely dominated Cardiff in every department?
I think you are clutching a straws personally. Take it on the chin and move on.