Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:13 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:58 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:04 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:06 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:24 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:https://twitter.com/StanCollymore/status/1176438305363283968?s=19
Says it all really
Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:56 pm
Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:04 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:09 pm
Bonner wrote:Take the blinkers off!
These are professional people..
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:12 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Bonner wrote:Take the blinkers off!
These are professional people..
If you know different I'd love to hear it.I agree that those who want remain will benefit from Boris's failed attempt to mislead the queen and stymie parliment.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:18 pm
Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Bonner wrote:Take the blinkers off!
These are professional people..
If you know different I'd love to hear it.I agree that those who want remain will benefit from Boris's failed attempt to mislead the queen and stymie parliment.
You said it yourself
Boris misled the Queen on reasons why he wanted to close Parliament, nothing to do whether you support in /out .
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:43 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Bonner wrote:Take the blinkers off!
These are professional people..
If you know different I'd love to hear it.I agree that those who want remain will benefit from Boris's failed attempt to mislead the queen and stymie parliment.
You said it yourself
Boris misled the Queen on reasons why he wanted to close Parliament, nothing to do whether you support in /out .
Then why did you ask me to take off the blinkers.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:53 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 3:10 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:59 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:20 pm
Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
I am losing the plot.. the take the blinkers off was in regards to the op post that judges were. biased and remainers
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:27 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
I am losing the plot.. the take the blinkers off was in regards to the op post that judges were. biased and remainers
absolute rubbish. This wasn’t a single rogue remainer judge. It was a panel of the best judges in the UK.
I suppose that if they had found for Boris they wouldn’t have been biased ?
The judiciary, in this country at least, are fiercely independent.
Just accept that Boris’s decision was a misuse of his power and now let Parliament debate their way out of this.
You all know that if we went for a poll for “no deal brexit” or “remain” which would win.
That’s why Boris is now running scared.
And before anyone says anything, I voted remain but also believe we should honour the referendum and leave, but with a deal.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:41 pm
Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:45 pm
pembroke allan wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:https://twitter.com/StanCollymore/status/1176438305363283968?s=19
Says it all really
Yep totally British judges but if we stay in watch EU law take over our judicial decision making? they already have sway in certain decisions we make and with clear rd ahead whats stopping EU court from taking over and we have to obey what they say? And this is not outside realms of probability!
Who the fck is collymore anyway?
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:46 pm
pembroke allan wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
I am losing the plot.. the take the blinkers off was in regards to the op post that judges were. biased and remainers
absolute rubbish. This wasn’t a single rogue remainer judge. It was a panel of the best judges in the UK.
I suppose that if they had found for Boris they wouldn’t have been biased ?
The judiciary, in this country at least, are fiercely independent.
Just accept that Boris’s decision was a misuse of his power and now let Parliament debate their way out of this.
You all know that if we went for a poll for “no deal brexit” or “remain” which would win.
That’s why Boris is now running scared.
And before anyone says anything, I voted remain but also believe we should honour the referendum and leave, but with a deal.
Borus took advice from attorney general highest law officer in country ( and neutral) he's reportedly told boris it was lawful to suspend parliament? He needs to resign if this is case as he's obviously not upto job! because even with boris's bullish attitude he would not have suspended parliament for length he did if advised it was illegal..
Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:23 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:https://twitter.com/StanCollymore/status/1176438305363283968?s=19
Says it all really
Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:45 pm
Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:54 pm
powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:14 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Yes you are misreading big time.Today's ruling had nothing to do with Brexit at all and wasn't considered at all during this hearing.A queens speech takes about 4 days to organise not 5 weeks and is not a reason to suspend parliament.
Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:28 pm
Wed Sep 25, 2019 6:53 am
powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Wed Sep 25, 2019 7:43 am
pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Yes you are misreading big time.Today's ruling had nothing to do with Brexit at all and wasn't considered at all during this hearing.A queens speech takes about 4 days to organise not 5 weeks and is not a reason to suspend parliament.
Judges actually said suspension was to inhibit or stop Brexit debate is that not something to do with Brexit?
Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:20 am
piledriver64 wrote:powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Even if you are right that Blair “set up” this this left leaning Supreme Court, how many are still alive never mind sitting !!?? We’ve had a Tory government for years !!
In any event, are you really seriously saying that these judges who virtually all came through a privileged system of public school !! Are you seriously saying they are anything other than staunch Tories in general ?
Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:56 am
powysblue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:powysblue wrote:Can I just say one thing before i make some comments.
This country had a DEMOCRATIC (something the bad loosers like to bandy around a lot) VOTE on LEAVING or REMAINING within the EU. Against all opinion polls, big business, moneymen, Government, Most MP's, Liberal's, The Great British People threw the biggest curved ball to the establishment and you know what - "they do not like it up em Sargent Major" (Dad's Army).
Since that momentous morning in 2016, all the above (the sore looser brigade) have been trying every trick in the book to overturn the democratic will of the Great British people (oh, there's that word again - Democratic).
On a very similar note, the Referendum about forming a Welsh Assembly which was passed by the tiniest of Majority and has been controlled by Labour since inception, did you hear any of the defeated NO voters carrying on like little babies who have thrown there toys out of the pram ? No, they admitted defeat and Got on with it unlike the EU Remainer bad loosers.
Funny that old word, Democratic, comes up time after time. Wales as a whole Voted to LEAVE the EU but our Labour Run Welsh Assembly know better. Mr Drakeford Democracy personified !!!!
First comment :
Did you know that it was under Mr Blair's Labour Government that this "Supreme court" was set up and filled with Left Leaning Liberal Judges. I bet nearly all 11 or Majority voted to Remain.
Second Comment:
Suspending Parliament.
As we Know the first Court ruling said that it was not a Judicial Matter but a political matter and was dismissed.
The Scottish Judges Ruled that it was Illegal.
Unless I am misreading it, Today's Ruling states that Mr Johnson, Suspended Parliament for the reason to stiffle debate on Brexit. As in any normal court, where is the evidence that Mr Johnson was thinking that? Surely any court works on an Evidence based ruling and not what may or may not have been going on in someones mind ?
Even if you are right that Blair “set up” this this left leaning Supreme Court, how many are still alive never mind sitting !!?? We’ve had a Tory government for years !!
In any event, are you really seriously saying that these judges who virtually all came through a privileged system of public school !! Are you seriously saying they are anything other than staunch Tories in general ?
Yes it is True that the Labour Government Under Prime Minister Blair, Set up the Supreme Court.
Yes, I would say that the majority of Judges have been through a public school system BUT that system along with state education and Universities since around the 1970's are dominated by liberal thinking "we know better than you" attitudes. You need look no further than today's school curriculum - no need for Gym, Art, Cookery, Humanities, etc. No Need for a well rounded education.
Wed Sep 25, 2019 9:09 am
pembroke allan wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
I am losing the plot.. the take the blinkers off was in regards to the op post that judges were. biased and remainers
absolute rubbish. This wasn’t a single rogue remainer judge. It was a panel of the best judges in the UK.
I suppose that if they had found for Boris they wouldn’t have been biased ?
The judiciary, in this country at least, are fiercely independent.
Just accept that Boris’s decision was a misuse of his power and now let Parliament debate their way out of this.
You all know that if we went for a poll for “no deal brexit” or “remain” which would win.
That’s why Boris is now running scared.
And before anyone says anything, I voted remain but also believe we should honour the referendum and leave, but with a deal.
Borus took advice from attorney general highest law officer in country ( and neutral) he's reportedly told boris it was lawful to suspend parliament? He needs to resign if this is case as he's obviously not upto job! because even with boris's bullish attitude he would not have suspended parliament for length he did if advised it was illegal..
Wed Sep 25, 2019 9:13 am
paulh_85 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Bonner wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Danny Says wrote:Travesty for these lawyers to have a say on parliamentary business. Clear breach of separation of powers. If anyone of these judges voted in the referendum they should have declared it.
A total biased left wing anti Brexit decision. Totally disgraceful.
Talking through your hat here.The case had nothing to do with Brexit at all.It was about preserving the right of parliament to scrutinise and challenge the executive in this country.
Bonner this was my original statement.You;ve attributed "Danny Says" statement to me.
I am losing the plot.. the take the blinkers off was in regards to the op post that judges were. biased and remainers
absolute rubbish. This wasn’t a single rogue remainer judge. It was a panel of the best judges in the UK.
I suppose that if they had found for Boris they wouldn’t have been biased ?
The judiciary, in this country at least, are fiercely independent.
Just accept that Boris’s decision was a misuse of his power and now let Parliament debate their way out of this.
You all know that if we went for a poll for “no deal brexit” or “remain” which would win.
That’s why Boris is now running scared.
And before anyone says anything, I voted remain but also believe we should honour the referendum and leave, but with a deal.
Borus took advice from attorney general highest law officer in country ( and neutral) he's reportedly told boris it was lawful to suspend parliament? He needs to resign if this is case as he's obviously not upto job! because even with boris's bullish attitude he would not have suspended parliament for length he did if advised it was illegal..
The AG isnt Neutral what are you on about?