Tommy Robinson facing jail after being found in contempt of

Tommy Robinson facing jail after being found in contempt of court

Friday 5th July 2019,


Tommy Robinson arrives at the Old Bailey in London for a committal hearing for alleged contempt of court.


Tommy Robinson faces jail after being found in contempt of court for filming defendants in a criminal trial and broadcasting the footage on social media.

Mr Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, could be jailed for up to two years after the ruling by High Court judges.

Disorder broke out outside the court as the verdict filtered through to the crowds of supporters of Mr Robinson.

Police raised their batons after some supporters stormed fences separating them from the media and the public, and beer cans were also thrown at journalists.

Tommy Robinson posed with supporters this morning before entering the Old Bailey in London for his hearing.


An aide to Mr Robinson attempted to diffuse the situation by climbing onto another person’s shoulders and calling for calm.

Howls of fury and disbelief came when the verdict was first announced.

Parts of the crowd began chanting “shame on you” and pointed at the court while others stood in silent disbelief.

A woman with a loud speaker said: “You’re disgusting, the bloody lot of you.”




The former EDL leader broke reporting restrictions to livestream the faces of defendants in a child grooming case in Huddersfield in 2018.

Restrictions were in place to postpone the publication of details of the trial until the end of a series of linked trials.

Tommy Robinson has issued a message to supporters on his Telegram group.

He said: “This is the biggest political stitch up we have ever seen. So every single journalist that photographed Tommy going into this court — are they going to be in the Old Bailey and getting guilty of contempt of court?

“This is the biggest case of ‘one rule for Tommy’ and one for everyone else.

“British justice system and the establishment stinks.”

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Here we go. Buckle in spectators! Grab the popcorn the shows about to begin

Disgusting verdict.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Well if you want rapist gangs to be stopped then prosecuting Tiny Tom is well within the public interest.

See: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/c ... Hu5sMpoZdz

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Lets be fair the guys a dick.

He said: “This is the biggest political stitch up we have ever seen. So every single journalist that photographed Tommy going into this court — are they going to be in the Old Bailey and getting guilty of contempt of court?

“This is the biggest case of ‘one rule for Tommy’ and one for everyone else.

I do not believe there were any reporting restrictions in this case so there is no contempt! Utter cock

The real culprits are the left wing State, Police and the BBC, who have created or support conditions where crying racism a shield for perverts. Applies to some on here as well.
Robinson is a by-product of that, who went too far.

Who is the state protecting?

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Well if you want rapist gangs to be stopped then prosecuting Tiny Tom is well within the public interest.

See: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/c ... Hu5sMpoZdz

Yes, well there's the problem you see. As I said, there's no doubt that he broke the law, and it's not news to me that this potentially opened a contempt defence for those on trial at the time.

As the article you quote says though, those Applications were made unsuccessfully and so there was no effect upon the trial as it turned out. It's also true that some time has passed since the events and he has already served more time than would be usual for such an offence.

Incidentally, we are all committing the same offence here by discussing it before sentencing, although I very much doubt that anyone will worry about it. The usual remedy is for the offender to apologise to the Court, and the fact that this man was not only committed to prison then released on appeal against the sentence might be expected to have led to a quiet disposal since there was no ill effect and so much time has passed.

It's not over though, and he may only be sentenced to time served. In my opinion that would be the right option for a number of reasons, but it seems possible that he will be given an additional sentence, which we might expect will create the impression that his politics were a factor in the decision.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

Incidentally, we are all committing the same offence here by discussing it before sentencing, although I very much doubt that anyone will worry about it.

Is that true? Surely we would need to discuss sentencing with the trail Judge or someone intimately involved such as the prosecutor or TR for it to be contempt of court?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

TR committed the crime and will receive a punishment I don't disagree with that.

However, I still think TR did do a public service in rising awareness. The Asian rape gangs scandal has been an awful stain on society and how Judge after Judge comes the conclusion that there was no racial motive is beyond belief.

I fully believe that there was an attempt to sanitise this awful crime by those perverts which has destroyed the lives of countless vulnerable WHITE women. It is time to call out these bastards out for what they are racist perverts.

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

TR committed the crime and will receive a punishment I don't disagree with that.

However, I still think TR did do a public service in rising awareness. The Asian rape gangs scandal has been an awful stain on society and how Judge after Judge comes the conclusion that there was no racial motive is beyond belief.

I fully believe that there was an attempt to sanitise this awful crime by those perverts which has destroyed the lives of countless vulnerable WHITE women. It is time to call out these bastards out for what they are racist perverts.

He could've raised awareness after the ruling and everything would've been ok. He did it before the end which could've allowed them to walk free even if they'd done it.
What if they were completely innocent? What if his actions had let them go free?

Incidentally, we are all committing the same offence here by discussing it before sentencing, although I very much doubt that anyone will worry about it.

Is that true? Surely we would need to discuss sentencing with the trail Judge or someone intimately involved such as the prosecutor or TR for it to be contempt of court?

Yes, it's perfectly true. If we had to discuss it with the Judge or one of the Parties, then Mr Robinson would be in the clear wouldn't he, since he didn't do that either ?
It's all to do with something called the rules of Sub Judice, which say amongst other things, that you can't publicly discuss in certain ways or publish matters which are under consideration by a Court, and that if you do so it can be a contempt of the Court. That can be under statute or Common Law.

The idea behind it is ( very broadly ), that such public comment might influence the outcome by intimidation or by injudicious evidence /argument being introduced. In Mr Robinson's case he additionally disturbed the environs of the Court and breached an Order.

The reason why no one here is likely to be bothered despite breaking these rules is that caselaw has established that a High Court Judge is immune from such influences and, at this stage , no jury but only a Judge is involved. The offence is committed but a conviction is therefore most unlikely on that basis.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

I was unaware any other British Journalist had been jailed for similar behavior, I know a couple had been fined. Perhaps you could provide examples of others who’ve been jailed.

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

TR committed the crime and will receive a punishment I don't disagree with that.

However, I still think TR did do a public service in rising awareness. The Asian rape gangs scandal has been an awful stain on society and how Judge after Judge comes the conclusion that there was no racial motive is beyond belief.

I fully believe that there was an attempt to sanitise this awful crime by those perverts which has destroyed the lives of countless vulnerable WHITE women. It is time to call out these bastards out for what they are racist perverts.

He could've raised awareness after the ruling and everything would've been ok. He did it before the end which could've allowed them to walk free even if they'd done it.
What if they were completely innocent? What if his actions had let them go free?

What if all the information was already on the BBC website?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

TR committed the crime and will receive a punishment I don't disagree with that.

However, I still think TR did do a public service in rising awareness. The Asian rape gangs scandal has been an awful stain on society and how Judge after Judge comes the conclusion that there was no racial motive is beyond belief.

I fully believe that there was an attempt to sanitise this awful crime by those perverts which has destroyed the lives of countless vulnerable WHITE women. It is time to call out these bastards out for what they are racist perverts.

He could've raised awareness after the ruling and everything would've been ok. He did it before the end which could've allowed them to walk free even if they'd done it.
What if they were completely innocent? What if his actions had let them go free?

What if all the information was already on the BBC website?

Here is a link to how TR nearly aided the grooming gangs getting away with their abhorrent crimes.

As the article describes TR disregarded the gagging order and the BBC did not.

TMs reporting about the case was cited by the lawyers of the accused.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/c ... 90436.html

Thankfully in this case our justice system worked and the sick individuals are serving time.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

I was unaware any other British Journalist had been jailed for similar behavior, I know a couple had been fined. Perhaps you could provide examples of others who’ve been jailed.

Joanne Fraill

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

I was unaware any other British Journalist had been jailed for similar behavior, I know a couple had been fined. Perhaps you could provide examples of others who’ve been jailed.

Joanne Fraill

She’s not a journalist

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

I was unaware any other British Journalist had been jailed for similar behavior, I know a couple had been fined. Perhaps you could provide examples of others who’ve been jailed.

Joanne Fraill

She’s not a journalist

Neither is tommeh, the original statement was that no one has had a contempt of court against them lead to jail and I'm not sure why you've had to caveat it with pointless conditions

Has he gone all "trans" and started playing up front for Englands women....... Never seen Ellen White and Robinson in the same room.

Cool let’s add contempt of court to the list of Tiny Tommy’s criminal offences.

Quick reminder that this list also includes:

Fraud
Abusive/Threatening behaviour
Assault
Common assault
Possession of a false ID
Assault of a police officer
Assault of a policeman who was trying to stop him assaulting his girlfriend

Feel free to add to what I’ve missed

Well I can subtract two which aren't criminal offences. Are the last two the same incident ? In fact, how many are the same incident ?

Will you be posting details about the various MPs who've been convicted of far more serious offences, and are you at all concerned about the rapes and child molestations which he broke the law by publisising ?

There is no doubt that he's committed an offence here, but whether it's in the public interest to prosecute him at this stage is another matter altogether. In any similar case the CPS or the Court would have dropped it by now , and even if someone were convicted of a similar offence they'd be very unlikely indeed to receive a custodial sentence.

Even from the point of view of the establishment it is counter intuitive because it will create a martyr and draw attention to what some might consider inequities in the administration of Justice.

Nice whataboutism
No matter what he does he's always the victim but I think it's time that I get to say
He lost, get over it

Equality before the law is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Do you honestly believe Tommy Robinson was treated exactly the same as everyone else, bearing in mind he’s certainly not the first to break this law but he is the first to to receive a custodial sentence for doing so?

Well he's not the first to receive a custodial sentence and there's a chance he'll get a lighter sentence than others so yes, I do think he's been treated fairly.

I was unaware any other British Journalist had been jailed for similar behavior, I know a couple had been fined. Perhaps you could provide examples of others who’ve been jailed.

Joanne Fraill

She’s not a journalist

Neither is tommeh, the original statement was that no one has had a contempt of court against them lead to jail and I'm not sure why you've had to caveat it with pointless conditions

Bwhahahahaha instead of trying to win petty points try looking at what’s actually happened . A journalist has been jailed , while many other hacks have copped a fine. I get you hate the guy and being objective is clearly difficult for you.

[
She’s not a journalist

Neither is tommeh, the original statement was that no one has had a contempt of court against them lead to jail and I'm not sure why you've had to caveat it with pointless conditions

Bwhahahahaha instead of trying to win petty points try looking at what’s actually happened . A journalist has been jailed , while many other hacks have copped a fine. I get you hate the guy and being objective is clearly difficult for you.

Bloody tomoaners out in force.
Hes had the law explained to him, he knew he was breaking it, and now he's acting like it's a snowflake so gullible idiots will donate to him.
I know you love the jailed 6 time,islamaphobic, druggie but maybe start respecting British laws. Will of the people and all that


And yes, I am phrasing this like a moron to show people who say stuff like that in other threads how stupid it looks

The real culprits are the left wing State, Police and the BBC, who have created or support conditions where crying racism a shield for perverts. Applies to some on here as well.
Robinson is a by-product of that, who went too far.

Who is the state protecting?

If you could explain how a conservative government represents a left wing state I’d love to hear it

Here’s another story which shows the devastating impact of TRs approach.

https://www.wigantoday.net/news/crime/w ... ssion=true

This is the stuff lads. This is what keeps the people entertained

No one has called anyone a looney lefty yet

Is Tommy Robinson a journalist now? He’s a busy lad ain’t he.

[
She’s not a journalist

Neither is tommeh, the original statement was that no one has had a contempt of court against them lead to jail and I'm not sure why you've had to caveat it with pointless conditions

Bwhahahahaha instead of trying to win petty points try looking at what’s actually happened . A journalist has been jailed , while many other hacks have copped a fine. I get you hate the guy and being objective is clearly difficult for you.

Bloody tomoaners out in force.
Hes had the law explained to him, he knew he was breaking it, and now he's acting like it's a snowflake so gullible idiots will donate to him.
I know you love the jailed 6 time,islamaphobic, druggie but maybe start respecting British laws. Will of the people and all that


And yes, I am phrasing this like a moron to show people who say stuff like that in other threads how stupid it looks

You argue like a child

The real culprits are the left wing State, Police and the BBC, who have created or support conditions where crying racism a shield for perverts. Applies to some on here as well.
Robinson is a by-product of that, who went too far.

Who is the state protecting?

If you could explain how a conservative government represents a left wing state I’d love to hear it

Come back when you’ve discovered the difference between Govt and State.
I’d love it if you read a post properly once in a while. I know it’s difficult.