Thu Apr 25, 2019 11:38 am
Thu Apr 25, 2019 12:47 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:19 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:24 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:41 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:The manager is not the issue at that club, the manager will never have real power while those players are there - it’s the opposite to when Ferguson was in charge.
Those players chucked Mourinho under the bus, and will do the same to Ole and the next one after that.
Thu Apr 25, 2019 1:56 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:The manager is not the issue at that club, the manager will never have real power while those players are there - it’s the opposite to when Ferguson was in charge.
Those players chucked Mourinho under the bus, and will do the same to Ole and the next one after that.
Thu Apr 25, 2019 2:03 pm
dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:13 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:The manager is not the issue at that club, the manager will never have real power while those players are there - it’s the opposite to when Ferguson was in charge.
Those players chucked Mourinho under the bus, and will do the same to Ole and the next one after that.
Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:26 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:37 pm
Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:52 pm
BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
Thu Apr 25, 2019 4:47 pm
dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
Thu Apr 25, 2019 10:48 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:The manager is not the issue at that club, the manager will never have real power while those players are there - it’s the opposite to when Ferguson was in charge.
Those players chucked Mourinho under the bus, and will do the same to Ole and the next one after that.
I agree, the issues run far deeper than on the pitch performances.
You watch Pogba angle for a move soon especially if they don’t make the top four and the Champions League.
As good as he can be he’s the first player to get rid of imo.
Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:13 am
BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:15 am
dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
I did not misread anything...some of them might have been on bigger wages than him.is what you said..
reality 25 mill came in that summer on transfers 11 mill went out..
the players leaving/retiring were on far superior wages to those who left
and the squad increased by 1.
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:36 am
BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
I did not misread anything...some of them might have been on bigger wages than him.is what you said..
reality 25 mill came in that summer on transfers 11 mill went out..
the players leaving/retiring were on far superior wages to those who left
and the squad increased by 1.
Yes I said it but you’re not understanding what I meant. I didn’t mean any single players were on a bigger wage, I meant some of them (accumulated) would’ve been on a bigger wage.
And yes, on paper, we spent less but look at who we signed:
Eikrem
Daehli
Zaha
Kenwyne
Fabio
Berget
Burgstaller
Le Fondre
Dikagcoi
Guerra
Macheda
Adeyemi
Morrison
Manga
Gabbidon
Pilkington
Apart from Morrison, Manga and Pilkington, every single one of those players flopped or should’ve/could’ve done better. So on paper it would’ve been cheaper but we didn’t spend much less but certainly didn’t progress at all whereas Malky spent money and progressed.
Plus, I don’t know this but I can only imagine Ole was on a bigger wage than the other managers we had.
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:18 am
RV Casual wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
I did not misread anything...some of them might have been on bigger wages than him.is what you said..
reality 25 mill came in that summer on transfers 11 mill went out..
the players leaving/retiring were on far superior wages to those who left
and the squad increased by 1.
Yes I said it but you’re not understanding what I meant. I didn’t mean any single players were on a bigger wage, I meant some of them (accumulated) would’ve been on a bigger wage.
And yes, on paper, we spent less but look at who we signed:
Eikrem
Daehli
Zaha
Kenwyne
Fabio
Berget
Burgstaller
Le Fondre
Dikagcoi
Guerra
Macheda
Adeyemi
Morrison
Manga
Gabbidon
Pilkington
Apart from Morrison, Manga and Pilkington, every single one of those players flopped or should’ve/could’ve done better. So on paper it would’ve been cheaper but we didn’t spend much less but certainly didn’t progress at all whereas Malky spent money and progressed.
Plus, I don’t know this but I can only imagine Ole was on a bigger wage than the other managers we had.
You can pick holes in any manager.
Malky spent the best part of £21 million on this lot
Cornelius
Kim
Velikonja
Odemwingie
Brayford
Maynard
Notwithstanding wages. None paid off.
That's on top of everything else he spent on some dubious signings.
Give it a few years and you will probably have people doing the same to Warnock.
Things didn't work out here for Ole, imo he wasn't given enough time and the board were to blame for allowing him to make the signings but not the time to implement his pholosophy.
BTW, Burgstaller has had an outstanding career since, and Guerra went back to La Liga and banged goals in for fun. Zaha is a quality player, we were right to question take a chance loan on him.
It didn't work out but I don't get why done cardiff fans want to crucify him at any given chance.
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:58 am
BluebirdForever wrote:RV Casual wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
I did not misread anything...some of them might have been on bigger wages than him.is what you said..
reality 25 mill came in that summer on transfers 11 mill went out..
the players leaving/retiring were on far superior wages to those who left
and the squad increased by 1.
Yes I said it but you’re not understanding what I meant. I didn’t mean any single players were on a bigger wage, I meant some of them (accumulated) would’ve been on a bigger wage.
And yes, on paper, we spent less but look at who we signed:
Eikrem
Daehli
Zaha
Kenwyne
Fabio
Berget
Burgstaller
Le Fondre
Dikagcoi
Guerra
Macheda
Adeyemi
Morrison
Manga
Gabbidon
Pilkington
Apart from Morrison, Manga and Pilkington, every single one of those players flopped or should’ve/could’ve done better. So on paper it would’ve been cheaper but we didn’t spend much less but certainly didn’t progress at all whereas Malky spent money and progressed.
Plus, I don’t know this but I can only imagine Ole was on a bigger wage than the other managers we had.
You can pick holes in any manager.
Malky spent the best part of £21 million on this lot
Cornelius
Kim
Velikonja
Odemwingie
Brayford
Maynard
Notwithstanding wages. None paid off.
That's on top of everything else he spent on some dubious signings.
Give it a few years and you will probably have people doing the same to Warnock.
Things didn't work out here for Ole, imo he wasn't given enough time and the board were to blame for allowing him to make the signings but not the time to implement his pholosophy.
BTW, Burgstaller has had an outstanding career since, and Guerra went back to La Liga and banged goals in for fun. Zaha is a quality player, we were right to question take a chance loan on him.
It didn't work out but I don't get why done cardiff fans want to crucify him at any given chance.
Well I liked Malky and Ole so I don’t know why you think I want to crucify them? It was wrong what Malky did after he left but everyone makes mistakes and as for Ole, no amount of time would’ve allowed him to succeed, he was not used to a club of our stature, he played the best part of his club at a far far superior club and managed a team at a far far inferior division. Cardiff City was unknown terrain for him.
Yes, Burgstaller has had a good career since but the point was, he didn’t here. And a number of players didn’t until he left so you can put that down to the manager too. IMO, Kimbo did well here, he took a while to get into the groove but when he did, he was a good player. As for Maynard, he started off well but got an injury very early into his career with us. A-Corn was undoubtedly a massive mistake - however, i’m not 100% sure about this but I don’t believe he was “Malky’s signing”. Odemwingie also did well at every club before us and I think he did well after he left us and obviously Velikonja - what the hell happened there? And Brayford too.
I agree you can pick out holes in managers and people are already doing it with Warnock now (Reid, Smithies) but the point I’m trying to make is that 85% of Solskjaer signings were awful and had little to no impact whereas the other managers whom spent close to the same amount had nowhere near that many bad signings.
I suppose what I’m saying is although Velikonja or A-Corn were bad, Malky also made good signings such as Tommy Smith, Cowie, Gestede who were all cheap or free and played roles in helping us go up but none of Ole’s cheap signings paid off and the only 3 that did were £1m, £3m and £5m+
Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:28 pm
RV Casual wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:RV Casual wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:BluebirdForever wrote:dogfound wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ole, I have always said a very nice person, but a disastrous manager for us, spent the most money ever and relegated us and took us on a terrible run in the Championship.
Started well at United, but 7 defeats from United's last 9 games, worse run for United since 1962, that for me is a awful.
he wasnt very good for us given..but spent the most..?
He signed a few players who probably weren’t on a small wage at the time - Pilkington, Fabio, Kenwyne Jones, Tom Adeyemi, Bruno Manga, Sean Morrison, Macheda, Le Fondre, Dikagcoi, Javi Guerra, Zaha, Cala etc. Some of them would’ve come with signing fees too so although none of them cost £9m like Cornelius, some of them might’ve been on a bigger wage than him.
bloody hell you think some of them might have been on more than the 45k a week cornelious was on ?![]()
![]()
im fully aware of who we signed and who left and the huge difference in expenditure...OGS might be lots of things but spent the most NO..not close
You’re misreading it. Nobody said that they were on more than Cornelius but if you add all of them up then undoubtedly yes they would be on more than 45k. I can’t imagine Zaha or Kenwyne being far off 45k per week when they were with us. Pilkington cost £1m and was on wages so high we struggled to offload him even as recent as last season (not 45k but high for a championship player). Morrison cost £3m. Le Fondre cost £3m. Manga was apparently £5m+ and thats not including their wages. The managers who came after Ole (Slade and Trollope) didn’t spend anywhere near that much either and Warnock didn’t spend that much until this season, only, Warnock actually improved the side. Solskjaer spent that much and we still saw ourselves getting worse.
So, expenditure that doesn’t pay off ends up being more expensive (as you have to rebuild) in contrast to expenditure that pays off more. Cornelius aside, the successful managers we’ve had (Malky and Warnock) spent money but all in all it generally paid off. Certainly a lot more than Ole’s expenditure. Depends how you look at it
I did not misread anything...some of them might have been on bigger wages than him.is what you said..
reality 25 mill came in that summer on transfers 11 mill went out..
the players leaving/retiring were on far superior wages to those who left
and the squad increased by 1.
Yes I said it but you’re not understanding what I meant. I didn’t mean any single players were on a bigger wage, I meant some of them (accumulated) would’ve been on a bigger wage.
And yes, on paper, we spent less but look at who we signed:
Eikrem
Daehli
Zaha
Kenwyne
Fabio
Berget
Burgstaller
Le Fondre
Dikagcoi
Guerra
Macheda
Adeyemi
Morrison
Manga
Gabbidon
Pilkington
Apart from Morrison, Manga and Pilkington, every single one of those players flopped or should’ve/could’ve done better. So on paper it would’ve been cheaper but we didn’t spend much less but certainly didn’t progress at all whereas Malky spent money and progressed.
Plus, I don’t know this but I can only imagine Ole was on a bigger wage than the other managers we had.
You can pick holes in any manager.
Malky spent the best part of £21 million on this lot
Cornelius
Kim
Velikonja
Odemwingie
Brayford
Maynard
Notwithstanding wages. None paid off.
That's on top of everything else he spent on some dubious signings.
Give it a few years and you will probably have people doing the same to Warnock.
Things didn't work out here for Ole, imo he wasn't given enough time and the board were to blame for allowing him to make the signings but not the time to implement his pholosophy.
BTW, Burgstaller has had an outstanding career since, and Guerra went back to La Liga and banged goals in for fun. Zaha is a quality player, we were right to question take a chance loan on him.
It didn't work out but I don't get why done cardiff fans want to crucify him at any given chance.
Well I liked Malky and Ole so I don’t know why you think I want to crucify them? It was wrong what Malky did after he left but everyone makes mistakes and as for Ole, no amount of time would’ve allowed him to succeed, he was not used to a club of our stature, he played the best part of his club at a far far superior club and managed a team at a far far inferior division. Cardiff City was unknown terrain for him.
Yes, Burgstaller has had a good career since but the point was, he didn’t here. And a number of players didn’t until he left so you can put that down to the manager too. IMO, Kimbo did well here, he took a while to get into the groove but when he did, he was a good player. As for Maynard, he started off well but got an injury very early into his career with us. A-Corn was undoubtedly a massive mistake - however, i’m not 100% sure about this but I don’t believe he was “Malky’s signing”. Odemwingie also did well at every club before us and I think he did well after he left us and obviously Velikonja - what the hell happened there? And Brayford too.
I agree you can pick out holes in managers and people are already doing it with Warnock now (Reid, Smithies) but the point I’m trying to make is that 85% of Solskjaer signings were awful and had little to no impact whereas the other managers whom spent close to the same amount had nowhere near that many bad signings.
I suppose what I’m saying is although Velikonja or A-Corn were bad, Malky also made good signings such as Tommy Smith, Cowie, Gestede who were all cheap or free and played roles in helping us go up but none of Ole’s cheap signings paid off and the only 3 that did were £1m, £3m and £5m+
Have to agree to disagree.
If you go through Malkys signings you will find at least half were poor or made little impact act here.
And about the same with OGS signings.
The difference being Malky took us up and Ole took us down.
However, OGS walked into a broken club that was a sinking ship and as I said, IMO not given the time needed to implement a philosophy.
Only time will tell whether he succeeds at UTD, my feeling is given time he will.