Sat Mar 30, 2019 6:12 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:14 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:54 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 8:37 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 9:40 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 9:48 am
goats wrote:So, the blame lies with whoever organised the flight then? I guess that lovely Scottish agent is in a spot of bother now, although I bet he will say the flight was supposed to go in daylight, so it’s Sala’s fault? Basically, it shouldn’t have gine ahead if it couldn’t go in daylight. There was bad weather that day too, snow and gales in parts. No way should that flight on that plane taken off.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:08 am
pembroke allan wrote:goats wrote:So, the blame lies with whoever organised the flight then? I guess that lovely Scottish agent is in a spot of bother now, although I bet he will say the flight was supposed to go in daylight, so it’s Sala’s fault? Basically, it shouldn’t have gine ahead if it couldn’t go in daylight. There was bad weather that day too, snow and gales in parts. No way should that flight on that plane taken off.
Did city know ameliano ask to change flight to eve because wanted more time at home?
If so surely they could have said no come in morning ! After all was no rush wuth 9 days to bext game.. having said that why did pilot agree to fly when he knew he couldn't? More questions with answers that may not be answered
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:13 am
pembroke allan wrote:goats wrote:So, the blame lies with whoever organised the flight then? I guess that lovely Scottish agent is in a spot of bother now, although I bet he will say the flight was supposed to go in daylight, so it’s Sala’s fault? Basically, it shouldn’t have gine ahead if it couldn’t go in daylight. There was bad weather that day too, snow and gales in parts. No way should that flight on that plane taken off.
Did city know ameliano ask to change flight to eve because wanted more time at home?
If so surely they could have said no come in morning ! After all was no rush wuth 9 days to bext game.. having said that why did pilot agree to fly when he knew he couldn't? More questions with answers that may not be answered
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:28 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:39 am
Forever Blue wrote:Any insurance regarding the flight etc would then be void.
The Agent (McKay) who organised this should be brought in for questioning .
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:43 am
pembroke allan wrote:
Did city know ameliano ask to change flight to eve because wanted more time at home?
If so surely they could have said no come in morning ! After all was no rush wuth 9 days to bext game.. having said that why did pilot agree to fly when he knew he couldn't? More questions with answers that may not be answered
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:51 am
Forever Blue wrote:Any insurance regarding the flight etc would then be void.
The Agent (McKay) who organised this should be brought in for questioning .
Sat Mar 30, 2019 11:17 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 11:27 am
epping blue wrote:I thought this was common knowledge within hours of him being named as the pilot. It was already known that he wasn't certified to fly by instruments and had to rely on sight.
It shouldn't negate Cardiff's insurance cover providing they were unaware of these arrangements. The fact that we separately made use of this operator / arrangement muddies that water a little. Clearly we lacked diligence ourselves in previously using this operator, if indeed he regularly flew without the requisite licences. That could ultimately give Nantes a get out. They could say " they knew about the arrangements but as Cardiff City themselves made frequent use of this operator they thought everything was in order.
Henderson, the de facto operator is up the swanny without a paddle. McKay will bare responsibility and depending on what he knew of the operation, possibly criminal responsibility. As the payment for the flight would have effectively come as a freebie out of the Nantes payment to the agent, then Nantes unwittingly absorb responsibility, mitigated by the above. Its for the lawyers rather than us speculating football fans.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 11:35 am
Sat Mar 30, 2019 12:05 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:pembroke allan wrote:
Did city know ameliano ask to change flight to eve because wanted more time at home?
If so surely they could have said no come in morning ! After all was no rush wuth 9 days to bext game.. having said that why did pilot agree to fly when he knew he couldn't? More questions with answers that may not be answered
The only way the club could take some of the blame would be in the circumstance where they knew ES had decided to fly at night using an unqualified pilot.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 12:27 pm
Sven wrote:epping blue wrote:I thought this was common knowledge within hours of him being named as the pilot. It was already known that he wasn't certified to fly by instruments and had to rely on sight.
It shouldn't negate Cardiff's insurance cover providing they were unaware of these arrangements. The fact that we separately made use of this operator / arrangement muddies that water a little. Clearly we lacked diligence ourselves in previously using this operator, if indeed he regularly flew without the requisite licences. That could ultimately give Nantes a get out. They could say " they knew about the arrangements but as Cardiff City themselves made frequent use of this operator they thought everything was in order.
Henderson, the de facto operator is up the swanny without a paddle. McKay will bare responsibility and depending on what he knew of the operation, possibly criminal responsibility. As the payment for the flight would have effectively come as a freebie out of the Nantes payment to the agent, then Nantes unwittingly absorb responsibility, mitigated by the above. Its for the lawyers rather than us speculating football fans.
I don't think Henderson's qualifications are in doubt (maybe his morals) but he didn't fly the plane, as he was apparently chartered to do, on the night of the tragedy. I guess what he told Agent McKay beforehand will have some bearing, too!
I think the big question in there may be "Did any of our flights involve Ibbotson as the pilot?" but even then, it depends on what club officials actually knew about the guy at the controls, which is unlikely to have been much more than "Hi, I'm Dave, your pilot...!"
Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:02 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:15 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Any insurance regarding the flight etc would then be void.
The Agent (McKay) who organised this should be brought in for questioning .
It is hard to see how WM won't be questioned over his involvement.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:17 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:41 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:49 pm
Rodneyblue wrote:This will definately affect the flight insurance !! It will probably become void !
Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:05 pm
epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:epping blue wrote:I thought this was common knowledge within hours of him being named as the pilot. It was already known that he wasn't certified to fly by instruments and had to rely on sight.
It shouldn't negate Cardiff's insurance cover providing they were unaware of these arrangements. The fact that we separately made use of this operator / arrangement muddies that water a little. Clearly we lacked diligence ourselves in previously using this operator, if indeed he regularly flew without the requisite licences. That could ultimately give Nantes a get out. They could say " they knew about the arrangements but as Cardiff City themselves made frequent use of this operator they thought everything was in order.
Henderson, the de facto operator is up the swanny without a paddle. McKay will bare responsibility and depending on what he knew of the operation, possibly criminal responsibility. As the payment for the flight would have effectively come as a freebie out of the Nantes payment to the agent, then Nantes unwittingly absorb responsibility, mitigated by the above. Its for the lawyers rather than us speculating football fans.
I don't think Henderson's qualifications are in doubt (maybe his morals) but he didn't fly the plane, as he was apparently chartered to do, on the night of the tragedy. I guess what he told Agent McKay beforehand will have some bearing, too!
I think the big question in there may be "Did any of our flights involve Ibbotson as the pilot?" but even then, it depends on what club officials actually knew about the guy at the controls, which is unlikely to have been much more than "Hi, I'm Dave, your pilot...!"
Henderson's qualification are largely irrelevant but as the " operator " I think he would have had a legal duty to ensure that the pilot had all the necessary qualifications, licences and experience to undertake the tasks given to him. Whoever engaged Henderson whether the agent in this case or us if we dealt with him directly needs to be able to prove that they took due diligence in the selection of that operator.
That would certainly involve asking for and being provided with the operators insurance and licenses to function as an operator of commercial flights. Taking it into the workplace setting it could involve checking an individuals right to be there. Even a basic labourer cant walk onto most construction sites without evidence of his qualification to be there. It might seem mad but its now become an excepted workplace norm. Clearly that's not the individual getting onto the plane checking the details.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 4:19 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2019 9:49 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Wanrock has said he thought Ibbotson had flown him before.
For me it seems Henderson was paid to do the flight and simply passed it on, I wonder if he took a cut. I bet McKay will delay all knowledge of ibberston.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:40 pm
RV Casual wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Wanrock has said he thought Ibbotson had flown him before.
For me it seems Henderson was paid to do the flight and simply passed it on, I wonder if he took a cut. I bet McKay will delay all knowledge of ibberston.
Where has he said that mate? I'd rather Warnock said nothing. Surely he cant 'think' Ibbotson had flewn him before, you would know wouldn't you surely?
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:49 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:55 pm
2blue2handle wrote:RV Casual wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Wanrock has said he thought Ibbotson had flown him before.
For me it seems Henderson was paid to do the flight and simply passed it on, I wonder if he took a cut. I bet McKay will delay all knowledge of ibberston.
Where has he said that mate? I'd rather Warnock said nothing. Surely he cant 'think' Ibbotson had flewn him before, you would know wouldn't you surely?
It was in his first press conference after the crash which I think was about a week after the accident. I'm pretty sure he said something like he seemed a good pilot or something to that effect.
Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:59 pm
Isawgarystevensscoreagoal wrote:Isn't all of this already known? Have no idea why BBC reporting this as news.
Sun Mar 31, 2019 12:24 am
Sven wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Any insurance regarding the flight etc would then be void.
The Agent (McKay) who organised this should be brought in for questioning .
I don't think there is anything 'new' in this report but it certainly confirms what was suspected previously, i.e. that the flight was carried out illegally
There will be a couple of squeaky bums sat in some pretty warm seats right now and I would imagine both the apparent mute, David Henderson, as well as Fake Agent (some may call him 'Facilitator') McKay will be at the front of the bus
Notwithstanding Cardiff City's own responsibilities in all of this, mainly financially it seems, this is a big event in what resulted in a sad loss of life and points to others 'knowing' about the illegal flights, a deliberate flouting of the rules (no one has yet explained the apparent 'logging' of Henderson's name on the airport pilot's sheet) and human error from an inexperienced pilot in the environment in which he agreed to operate