Sun Nov 18, 2018 6:38 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:04 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:08 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:17 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:39 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:14 pm
SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
Sun Nov 18, 2018 10:33 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 10:46 pm
cardiff 74 wrote:Disgraceful who ever did that to him I've got totall respect for him
Sun Nov 18, 2018 10:55 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:23 pm
Gaynor Straight wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
The 16 year old would have had to meet Alfie face to face and apologise then be told why what he did is not on.
Quick and easy justice without the need for the courts.
Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:36 pm
SirJimmySchoular wrote:Gaynor Straight wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
The 16 year old would have had to meet Alfie face to face and apologise then be told why what he did is not on.
Quick and easy justice without the need for the courts.
Oh I really don't know about this at all. There's a very good reason why we have Courts.
The idea of allowing a police officer to dispose of cases is quite worrying in fact.
Either way this case sounds unsatisfactory . Was a young kid bullied into an admission without legal advise then either physically or otherwise intimidated by the other party without due investigation ? On the other hand, did some dangerous little yob get away with an assault by just saying sorry ?
No, no , no. Justice must be open to public scrutiny and due process. The public have a legitimate interest in seeing due process followed and it is hard to imagine how a proper outcome can be achieved on the spot, without legally qualified supervision and without open accountability .
Now, I'm not for one moment saying that the police shouldn't have the discretion to conclude minor incidents without proceedings and simply issuing " words of advice" to the parties . Indeed , there is a tendency to prosecute all sorts of nonsense these days , which I deplore. However, if we're going to publicly announce that this man has been assaulted , and thus implicitly state that the other party is a criminal , then the only way of doing that is by putting the evidence to a Court.
I would be interested , ( and shall find out), whether such disposals are considered to be recordable , or can be quoted as convictions, ( as police cautions can). If so , then something needs to be done about that.
As I said earlier, I have a most uneasy feeling about this case as it has been reported here.
Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:52 pm
Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:49 am
Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:49 am
Dave67 wrote:Gareth Thomas is a big bloke.
Any 16 year old stupid enough to throw a punch at him is destined to be prison fodder sooner or later, hopefully he will learn from this and change his ways.
Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:33 am
SirJimmySchoular wrote:Gaynor Straight wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
The 16 year old would have had to meet Alfie face to face and apologise then be told why what he did is not on.
Quick and easy justice without the need for the courts.
Oh I really don't know about this at all. There's a very good reason why we have Courts.
The idea of allowing a police officer to dispose of cases is quite worrying in fact.
Either way this case sounds unsatisfactory . Was a young kid bullied into an admission without legal advise then either physically or otherwise intimidated by the other party without due investigation ? On the other hand, did some dangerous little yob get away with an assault by just saying sorry ?
No, no , no. Justice must be open to public scrutiny and due process. The public have a legitimate interest in seeing due process followed and it is hard to imagine how a proper outcome can be achieved on the spot, without legally qualified supervision and without open accountability .
Now, I'm not for one moment saying that the police shouldn't have the discretion to conclude minor incidents without proceedings and simply issuing " words of advice" to the parties . Indeed , there is a tendency to prosecute all sorts of nonsense these days , which I deplore. However, if we're going to publicly announce that this man has been assaulted , and thus implicitly state that the other party is a criminal , then the only way of doing that is by putting the evidence to a Court.
I would be interested , ( and shall find out), whether such disposals are considered to be recordable , or can be quoted as convictions, ( as police cautions can). If so , then something needs to be done about that.
As I said earlier, I have a most uneasy feeling about this case as it has been reported here.
Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:19 am
Mon Nov 19, 2018 10:37 am
dogfound wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Gaynor Straight wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
The 16 year old would have had to meet Alfie face to face and apologise then be told why what he did is not on.
Quick and easy justice without the need for the courts.
Oh I really don't know about this at all. There's a very good reason why we have Courts.
The idea of allowing a police officer to dispose of cases is quite worrying in fact.
Either way this case sounds unsatisfactory . Was a young kid bullied into an admission without legal advise then either physically or otherwise intimidated by the other party without due investigation ? On the other hand, did some dangerous little yob get away with an assault by just saying sorry ?
No, no , no. Justice must be open to public scrutiny and due process. The public have a legitimate interest in seeing due process followed and it is hard to imagine how a proper outcome can be achieved on the spot, without legally qualified supervision and without open accountability .
Now, I'm not for one moment saying that the police shouldn't have the discretion to conclude minor incidents without proceedings and simply issuing " words of advice" to the parties . Indeed , there is a tendency to prosecute all sorts of nonsense these days , which I deplore. However, if we're going to publicly announce that this man has been assaulted , and thus implicitly state that the other party is a criminal , then the only way of doing that is by putting the evidence to a Court.
I would be interested , ( and shall find out), whether such disposals are considered to be recordable , or can be quoted as convictions, ( as police cautions can). If so , then something needs to be done about that.
As I said earlier, I have a most uneasy feeling about this case as it has been reported here.
yep...and your just the man to do something about it.
your probably a bit miffed they kept you out of the loop as well.
Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:27 pm
Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:40 pm
SirJimmySchoular wrote:dogfound wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Gaynor Straight wrote:SirJimmySchoular wrote:Hang on a minute. What sort of "restorative justice " are we talking about here ?
What can possibly amount to justice in these circumstances . I hope they're not saying they let him beat a 16 year old kid up or anything approaching that. A professional sportsman is attacked and beaten up by a 16 year old kid ?
I wonder what actually happened and whether there's another side to the story - which is why matters like this should be aired in Court.
I really don't like the sound of this you know ,
The 16 year old would have had to meet Alfie face to face and apologise then be told why what he did is not on.
Quick and easy justice without the need for the courts.
Oh I really don't know about this at all. There's a very good reason why we have Courts.
The idea of allowing a police officer to dispose of cases is quite worrying in fact.
Either way this case sounds unsatisfactory . Was a young kid bullied into an admission without legal advise then either physically or otherwise intimidated by the other party without due investigation ? On the other hand, did some dangerous little yob get away with an assault by just saying sorry ?
No, no , no. Justice must be open to public scrutiny and due process. The public have a legitimate interest in seeing due process followed and it is hard to imagine how a proper outcome can be achieved on the spot, without legally qualified supervision and without open accountability .
Now, I'm not for one moment saying that the police shouldn't have the discretion to conclude minor incidents without proceedings and simply issuing " words of advice" to the parties . Indeed , there is a tendency to prosecute all sorts of nonsense these days , which I deplore. However, if we're going to publicly announce that this man has been assaulted , and thus implicitly state that the other party is a criminal , then the only way of doing that is by putting the evidence to a Court.
I would be interested , ( and shall find out), whether such disposals are considered to be recordable , or can be quoted as convictions, ( as police cautions can). If so , then something needs to be done about that.
As I said earlier, I have a most uneasy feeling about this case as it has been reported here.
yep...and your just the man to do something about it.
your probably a bit miffed they kept you out of the loop as well.
It's a pity you've decided to lock on to me with your trolling, for your own sake really. It won't effect me, but it's not good for you psychologically.
You do seem to find it unimaginable that anyone might be in a position to speak to 'influencial' people or have their views taken seriously by those who are in a position to act in matters of public policy. Perhaps you don't like that possibility because you think it somehow devalues you ? It doesn't in fact - you have and have had exactly the same opportunities as me or anyone else to make your mark , and you have, no doubt, made your own choices where to pitch your ambitions and how much effort to put in to achieving them.
What you have done during this process of life and your reputation in matters of competence and honour will determine how seriously your views are taken, and that is in your own hands.
Similarly, you may rest assured that I've generally been " in the loop" about somewhat more important matters than a minor punch up in Cardiff, and in the particular matter of criminal cases I have dealt with hundreds if not more, including very serious ones.
The reason why I even bother to address you on this is that you appear to me to be the type of chap who smothers ambition and confidence in those less able to stand up to you than I am.
I therefore say to any observers who may be young and not yet established that you must ignore this sort of attitude ,which you will encounter whenever you are seen to be doing well or progressing . They are simply scared that your success will expose their own mediocrity , and will therefore try to extinguish your bright light in case you surpass them. If you're not careful they'll knock you off course but you must understand what they are and not allow them to drag you back into line .
Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:58 pm