Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:00 pm

[quote="Midfield general"]Bitter, Bitter, Bitter :lol: :lol:

http://forum.planetswans.co.uk/viewtopi ... a&start=51[/quot

what a load of shite!!! thats all ive got to say, sinclair isnt even good enough to clean bellamys boots!!

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:03 pm

Bellamy is NOT going to get any better, and one bad knock from a Championship defender on his knee and that's your 'investment' spunked up the wall.


Same as if the same happens to Sinclair... The really do need to think before they open their mouth..

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:09 pm

if this sinclair is so good why didnt anyone else come in for him?

thats something the stupid jack fucks should ask themselves.

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:23 pm

What they said was.. he will be worth THREE TIMES what they paid for him in a couple of years

Well woopy f*cking doo :lol: A massive £1.5 million two seasons down the line, if it all works
out for the lad

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:26 pm

Just about shows the level of their ambition and broadness of their horizon. No wonder they're Wales' 2nd city and a feeder team to Neath

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:46 pm

Bitter indeed.

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:58 pm

Best post was one of em saying Gary Monk will match Bellamy for pace :lol:

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:16 pm

And meanwhile, back in the real world...

In fairness to them, a particularly good shipment may have hit the streets down west.

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:02 am

Sinclair has been at a number of clubs on-loan. Interesting to see that none tried to sign him even with a fairly low transfer fee.

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:07 am

I think your all out of order, you know Chelsea wouldnt loan Sinclair to a rival so sold him for a minimal fee to a champ club instead :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:08 am

who honistly cares what they think? :ayatollah:

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:12 am

They do and.......... uuummmmm Allan Davies from QI maybe as he is also a complete c**t

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:56 am

Well I think they have a point in some respects. If he does sign and it is for 6 months only there will be no resale value that we have. Potentially they could sell Sinclair for a lot of money and at this level he will do a good job. I know Bellamy will tear this league up but only for 6 months. Look at Fowler. Paid him silly wages and then got nothing back.

Re: Jacks think that Sinclair is a better signing than Bellamy

Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:59 am

maccydee wrote:Well I think they have a point in some respects. If he does sign and it is for 6 months only there will be no resale value that we have. Potentially they could sell Sinclair for a lot of money and at this level he will do a good job. I know Bellamy will tear this league up but only for 6 months. Look at Fowler. Paid him silly wages and then got nothing back.


Quite true, but if we got Bellamy, 6 months would be enough to get us promoted and a lot more money than the sale of Sinclair could ever bring! ;) :) :ayatollah: