Mon May 07, 2018 7:42 pm
Mon May 07, 2018 8:07 pm
Ninianman wrote:At the end of the day all it got them was a place in the playoffs along with teams who scrapped in at the end.
Never been good for the team who finish 3rd,usually it's the last placed team who normally finish 50 points behind them who go up.
Mon May 07, 2018 8:21 pm
davids wrote:Ninianman wrote:At the end of the day all it got them was a place in the playoffs along with teams who scrapped in at the end.
Never been good for the team who finish 3rd,usually it's the last placed team who normally finish 50 points behind them who go up.
It's wrong though isn't it?
In the play offs, 5th should be at home against 6th in a one-off game, then the winner of that game plays away to 4th in a one-off game and the winner of that game plays 3rd at Wembley.
That way, 3rd only has to win one game to be promoted, 4th has to win two and 5th and 6th have to win three games.
Coming 3rd should give some advantage and a better chance of winning promotion than 6th
Mon May 07, 2018 8:28 pm
paulh_85 wrote:davids wrote:Ninianman wrote:At the end of the day all it got them was a place in the playoffs along with teams who scrapped in at the end.
Never been good for the team who finish 3rd,usually it's the last placed team who normally finish 50 points behind them who go up.
It's wrong though isn't it?
In the play offs, 5th should be at home against 6th in a one-off game, then the winner of that game plays away to 4th in a one-off game and the winner of that game plays 3rd at Wembley.
That way, 3rd only has to win one game to be promoted, 4th has to win two and 5th and 6th have to win three games.
Coming 3rd should give some advantage and a better chance of winning promotion than 6th
Would end up being counter productive.
Just keep it the way it is
Mon May 07, 2018 8:36 pm
Mon May 07, 2018 9:15 pm
davids wrote:paulh_85 wrote:davids wrote:Ninianman wrote:At the end of the day all it got them was a place in the playoffs along with teams who scrapped in at the end.
Never been good for the team who finish 3rd,usually it's the last placed team who normally finish 50 points behind them who go up.
It's wrong though isn't it?
In the play offs, 5th should be at home against 6th in a one-off game, then the winner of that game plays away to 4th in a one-off game and the winner of that game plays 3rd at Wembley.
That way, 3rd only has to win one game to be promoted, 4th has to win two and 5th and 6th have to win three games.
Coming 3rd should give some advantage and a better chance of winning promotion than 6th
Would end up being counter productive.
Just keep it the way it is
How would it be counter productive?
Mon May 07, 2018 9:18 pm
thomasblue wrote:I think a two leg match between 3rd place in the championship and the team finishing 3rd from bottom in the premier would be fairer.
That way you prove you are good enough to take the place of a premier league team. Coming 6th and getting promoted is stupid imo
Mon May 07, 2018 11:48 pm
paulh_85 wrote:davids wrote:paulh_85 wrote:davids wrote:Ninianman wrote:At the end of the day all it got them was a place in the playoffs along with teams who scrapped in at the end.
Never been good for the team who finish 3rd,usually it's the last placed team who normally finish 50 points behind them who go up.
It's wrong though isn't it?
In the play offs, 5th should be at home against 6th in a one-off game, then the winner of that game plays away to 4th in a one-off game and the winner of that game plays 3rd at Wembley.
That way, 3rd only has to win one game to be promoted, 4th has to win two and 5th and 6th have to win three games.
Coming 3rd should give some advantage and a better chance of winning promotion than 6th
Would end up being counter productive.
Just keep it the way it is
How would it be counter productive?
Because you’d have the team who play third going three weeks without a game
Tue May 08, 2018 1:05 am
Tue May 08, 2018 7:25 am
Welshman in CA wrote:Bottom three down & top three up would solve the issue................................. Oh hang on a minute, that doesn't generate any extra income.
Thomasblues idea makes sense as well but again doesn't generate the income that the present system does.
Tue May 08, 2018 1:02 pm