Sun Aug 06, 2017 1:58 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:20 am
Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:32 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:14 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 6:26 pm
Sven wrote:Far too long to post in its entirety but well worth a read, if for no other reason than to show how 'influential' the media can be and how we can often see only what we WANT to see!![]()
![]()
http://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.co ... in-gatlin/
Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:08 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:09 pm
griff105 wrote:Sven wrote:Far too long to post in its entirety but well worth a read, if for no other reason than to show how 'influential' the media can be and how we can often see only what we WANT to see!![]()
![]()
http://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.co ... in-gatlin/
This is a really interesting article.
People should read it before voting I think
Mon Aug 07, 2017 8:22 pm
dogfound wrote:griff105 wrote:Sven wrote:Far too long to post in its entirety but well worth a read, if for no other reason than to show how 'influential' the media can be and how we can often see only what we WANT to see!![]()
![]()
http://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.co ... in-gatlin/
This is a really interesting article.
People should read it before voting I think
i had already voted banned after 2nd offence.
read the article and the 1st offence was clearly not cheating but having been through that..erm. youd think he would be super cautious. that rogue physio rubbing unknown stuff into his legs ?.nah..bit like vincent asking Annis to rub in his sun tan lotion then getting upset when he looks like a smurf the following day.
Mon Aug 07, 2017 8:50 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:04 pm
RV Casual wrote:The first offence as others have said was clearly not cheating.
The second offence, guilty BUT he did the crime and served the time and deserves a second chance same as anyone in life.
If it wasn't for the Bolt (who finished 3rd anyway) love in I doubt many would bat an eyelid, I thought the crowd booing him were pathetic if I'm honest but that is just my humble opinion.
Mon Aug 07, 2017 10:31 pm
Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:58 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:To be caught once is bad enough but to be caught twice Chris is unforgivable. He should be banned for life, he is a cheater and you can't have any respect for athletics when it is full of cheating drug cheats.
Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:19 pm
Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:To be caught once is bad enough but to be caught twice Chris is unforgivable. He should be banned for life, he is a cheater and you can't have any respect for athletics when it is full of cheating drug cheats.
Steve, I'm with you on this. I voted Option 2 (banned for life after the second offence) and stick by that. I was just intrigued by the article which states that the first 'offence' was 'technical' rather than malicious. The second one is pure conjecture and in the absence of contrary proof of a 'set-up' he should not have been competing last weekend. That's not about Usain Bolt, as he wouldn't have won anyway (he was third in the race)![]()
Hope all is good with you all, fella? Not at Burton? Are you at Wolves?
Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:26 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:To be caught once is bad enough but to be caught twice Chris is unforgivable. He should be banned for life, he is a cheater and you can't have any respect for athletics when it is full of cheating drug cheats.
Steve, I'm with you on this. I voted Option 2 (banned for life after the second offence) and stick by that. I was just intrigued by the article which states that the first 'offence' was 'technical' rather than malicious. The second one is pure conjecture and in the absence of contrary proof of a 'set-up' he should not have been competing last weekend. That's not about Usain Bolt, as he wouldn't have won anyway (he was third in the race)![]()
Hope all is good with you all, fella? Not at Burton? Are you at Wolves?
Was at Burton thinking about Wolves Chris![]()
Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:25 pm
Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:To be caught once is bad enough but to be caught twice Chris is unforgivable. He should be banned for life, he is a cheater and you can't have any respect for athletics when it is full of cheating drug cheats.
Steve, I'm with you on this. I voted Option 2 (banned for life after the second offence) and stick by that. I was just intrigued by the article which states that the first 'offence' was 'technical' rather than malicious. The second one is pure conjecture and in the absence of contrary proof of a 'set-up' he should not have been competing last weekend. That's not about Usain Bolt, as he wouldn't have won anyway (he was third in the race)![]()
Hope all is good with you all, fella? Not at Burton? Are you at Wolves?
Was at Burton thinking about Wolves Chris[/quote
I just thought...I bet you were in the posh seats! LOL![]()
![]()
Hopefully see you at Wolves!![]()
Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:46 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Sven wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:To be caught once is bad enough but to be caught twice Chris is unforgivable. He should be banned for life, he is a cheater and you can't have any respect for athletics when it is full of cheating drug cheats.
Steve, I'm with you on this. I voted Option 2 (banned for life after the second offence) and stick by that. I was just intrigued by the article which states that the first 'offence' was 'technical' rather than malicious. The second one is pure conjecture and in the absence of contrary proof of a 'set-up' he should not have been competing last weekend. That's not about Usain Bolt, as he wouldn't have won anyway (he was third in the race)![]()
Hope all is good with you all, fella? Not at Burton? Are you at Wolves?
Was at Burton thinking about Wolves Chris[/quote
I just thought...I bet you were in the posh seats! LOL![]()
![]()
Hopefully see you at Wolves!![]()
Like fook I was on the terrace how you are supposed to watch football![]()
![]()
![]()