Tue May 30, 2017 12:56 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 2:58 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 3:07 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 3:21 pm
litoblues wrote:i want that tree he is using to grow the money..
Tue May 30, 2017 3:23 pm
litoblues wrote:i want that tree he is using to grow the money..
Tue May 30, 2017 7:25 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 8:11 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 8:26 pm
ffs wrote:More desperate lies by the ToriesThis tax has nothing to do with gardens btw. It's mainly a tax that will target the foreign billionaires buying properties and barely living in them. This tax is a good thing for 98+% of the UK population
Tue May 30, 2017 9:15 pm
ffs wrote:More desperate lies by the ToriesThis tax has nothing to do with gardens btw. It's mainly a tax that will target the foreign billionaires buying properties and barely living in them. This tax is a good thing for 98+% of the UK population
Tue May 30, 2017 10:27 pm
Tue May 30, 2017 10:32 pm
dogfound wrote:ffs wrote:More desperate lies by the ToriesThis tax has nothing to do with gardens btw. It's mainly a tax that will target the foreign billionaires buying properties and barely living in them. This tax is a good thing for 98+% of the UK population
i cant find any reference anywhere in the manifesto to foreign billionaires.
not like you to make things up.
or infact Sneggy to encourage the made up stuff.
whats actually in there is vague..i mean the whole manifesto not just this land tax.
Wed May 31, 2017 8:56 am
Wed May 31, 2017 10:40 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:dogfound wrote:ffs wrote:More desperate lies by the ToriesThis tax has nothing to do with gardens btw. It's mainly a tax that will target the foreign billionaires buying properties and barely living in them. This tax is a good thing for 98+% of the UK population
i cant find any reference anywhere in the manifesto to foreign billionaires.
not like you to make things up.
or infact Sneggy to encourage the made up stuff.
whats actually in there is vague..i mean the whole manifesto not just this land tax.
Duly noted my good man.In fact,someone ought to stick up for the 72 Tory MP landlords that must be shitting themselves in case Labour win.
Wed May 31, 2017 12:19 pm
Wed May 31, 2017 2:39 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
Wed May 31, 2017 3:25 pm
nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
That won't stop millions of gullible readers lapping it up don't worry lol
Wed May 31, 2017 4:23 pm
nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
That won't stop millions of gullible readers lapping it up don't worry lol
Wed May 31, 2017 4:54 pm
pembroke allan wrote:nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
That won't stop millions of gullible readers lapping it up don't worry lol
I'm a pathaphist when it comes to voting don't believe anyone as all lyers so I choose not to vote! But still have an opinion , and no I don't whinge at policies brought in as in 42yrs of being able to vote nothing as changed in respect of parties being devious in their pledges.
Wed May 31, 2017 6:02 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:pembroke allan wrote:nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
That won't stop millions of gullible readers lapping it up don't worry lol
I'm a pathaphist when it comes to voting don't believe anyone as all lyers so I choose not to vote! But still have an opinion , and no I don't whinge at policies brought in as in 42yrs of being able to vote nothing as changed in respect of parties being devious in their pledges.
Nothing changes, and that is close to the truth. Whoever wins this election, not many on here will notice a difference. I have been through 43 years since being eligible to vote, and in all that time, my living standards have been what I descibe as ok. Never made a blind bit of difference which party was in, my left over spending money each month would buy me the same things whoever was at in.10. There is only so much money to play with, and you can guarantee that any party who gives you something will make up for it by taking away something else. Neither Labour or Conservatives can magic up a perfect NHS or state pension scheme etc., not unless they find a way of reducing our life spans back to around 65. we can't return to the 1950's when our population was 50 million and when a lot of people never lived long enough to draw their state pension. We are living 20 years longer now, the population has grown, and there is only so much tax that people can pay. No party has a magic money tree.
Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:08 pm
dogfound wrote:nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Was interesting until saw the report was commissioned by the conservatives? So no bias in the way story is portrayed?
That won't stop millions of gullible readers lapping it up don't worry lol
its vague mate..read it. it COULD cost all of us ..or it COULD be aimed at millionaires.
whats not vague though is the amount of ..extremely gullible pple that buy into Corbyn was part of if not the cornerstone of the good friday agreement. and this excuses him from condeming child murderers even 20 years later.
being too young doesnt excuse people for not looking deeper.
its those very people who shout..DONT BELIEVE THE PAPERS. that believe twitter memes. and all this very recent spin on Corbyn.