Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:59 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:03 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:10 am
nubbsy wrote:3m????? I thought he was free. Or is that how much his contract will cost?
Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:35 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:25 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:00 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:02 am
boyo1927 wrote:nubbsy wrote:3m????? I thought he was free. Or is that how much his contract will cost?
That's his wages for the 2 years I believe
Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:28 am
Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:31 am
Forever Blue wrote:boyo1927 wrote:nubbsy wrote:3m????? I thought he was free. Or is that how much his contract will cost?
That's his wages for the 2 years I believe
Correct, it's at least that.
Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:34 am
stickywicket wrote:Very strange ,sits on the bench for an hour then decides hes not fit to go on.
![]()
Sat Apr 15, 2017 12:18 pm
Sat Apr 15, 2017 12:26 pm
JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
Sat Apr 15, 2017 12:39 pm
JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
Sat Apr 15, 2017 12:49 pm
Sat Apr 15, 2017 1:20 pm
nubbsy wrote:JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
I thought it was 2 years with option for third
Sat Apr 15, 2017 3:23 pm
JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:02 pm
stickywicket wrote:Very strange ,sits on the bench for an hour then decides hes not fit to go on.
![]()
Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:29 pm
Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:34 pm
Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:51 pm
Sun Apr 16, 2017 6:07 am
davids wrote:stickywicket wrote:Very strange ,sits on the bench for an hour then decides hes not fit to go on.
![]()
Pulled an arse muscle when he dropped his wallet at half time and bent to pick it up.
Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:10 am
JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:30 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
When he signed I definitely remember it being reported that the second year was dependent on a number of appearances this season.
However, so many sources have now said it was 2 years with a third as an option. Also even if it was one year with a second year option surely he hasn't got anywhere near the triggering figure and could play these last few without compromising the club?
Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:07 pm
dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
When he signed I definitely remember it being reported that the second year was dependent on a number of appearances this season.
However, so many sources have now said it was 2 years with a third as an option. Also even if it was one year with a second year option surely he hasn't got anywhere near the triggering figure and could play these last few without compromising the club?
it says 2 years here
http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news/art ... 84352.aspx
and he has 17 apps this season so far believe it or not.
Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:53 pm
dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
When he signed I definitely remember it being reported that the second year was dependent on a number of appearances this season.
However, so many sources have now said it was 2 years with a third as an option. Also even if it was one year with a second year option surely he hasn't got anywhere near the triggering figure and could play these last few without compromising the club?
it says 2 years here
http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news/art ... 84352.aspx
and he has 17 apps this season so far believe it or not.
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:11 pm
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:13 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:JJ1927 wrote:I seem to remember someone saying that his contract was for one year with him having an option to renew for a second on same wages only if he played a number of games -25 rings a bell. Does anyone else recall this or did I dream it? If its true it would tie in with Warnocks reluctance to play him a few weeks ago despite Lambert saying he was fit and now he can no longer get to that 25, his reluctance to get off the bench.
When he signed I definitely remember it being reported that the second year was dependent on a number of appearances this season.
However, so many sources have now said it was 2 years with a third as an option. Also even if it was one year with a second year option surely he hasn't got anywhere near the triggering figure and could play these last few without compromising the club?
it says 2 years here
http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news/art ... 84352.aspx
and he has 17 apps this season so far believe it or not.
17? I'm stunned it's that many
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:20 pm
Chris Holmes wrote:They are probably trying to get to a position where he has to retire and get an insurance payout before the end of his contract
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:27 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Chris Holmes wrote:They are probably trying to get to a position where he has to retire and get an insurance payout before the end of his contract
That is where i am on this....One for the lawyers