Sat Apr 08, 2017 3:54 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 3:57 pm

Sat Apr 08, 2017 3:59 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Pleasing that we have once again won from losing position a good win against inform team the character and spirit Warnock has instilled into the team.![]()
Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:00 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:01 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:26 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:39 pm
nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:50 pm
nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:52 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:03 pm
englishbluebird wrote:Very happy with the second half from the team today.Brentford are well known to be a very good passing side and they played some really nice football to be fair. Whittingham was excellent second half and certainly didn't play like someone just going through the motions.Another game we would have lost under previous managers. In Neil we trust![]()
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:09 pm
Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:19 pm
Forever Blue wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Very happy with the second half from the team today.Brentford are well known to be a very good passing side and they played some really nice football to be fair. Whittingham was excellent second half and certainly didn't play like someone just going through the motions.Another game we would have lost under previous managers. In Neil we trust![]()
Hopefully Whitts agrees a deal.
Yes Brentford a good footballing side, so a very good win
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:46 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:53 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:55 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Maybe, maybe not, but the guy still oozes class and can win games. Ralls can't touch him for creativity and he was the difference between winning and losing the game today.
I'm not bothered if he gets £8,000 or £12,000 personally as I'm not paying but I truly hope he stays.
Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:00 pm
Sven wrote:Forever Blue wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Very happy with the second half from the team today.Brentford are well known to be a very good passing side and they played some really nice football to be fair. Whittingham was excellent second half and certainly didn't play like someone just going through the motions.Another game we would have lost under previous managers. In Neil we trust![]()
Hopefully Whitts agrees a deal.
Yes Brentford a good footballing side, so a very good win
The positive thing is that Whitts doesn't really want to move from either the club or his Penarth home (why would he?) and would accept a reasonable deal that will see him into the last years of his career...
Hopefully, common ground can be found and the City legend stays!![]()
Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:15 pm
Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:24 pm
castleblue wrote:Sven wrote:Forever Blue wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Very happy with the second half from the team today.Brentford are well known to be a very good passing side and they played some really nice football to be fair. Whittingham was excellent second half and certainly didn't play like someone just going through the motions.Another game we would have lost under previous managers. In Neil we trust![]()
Hopefully Whitts agrees a deal.
Yes Brentford a good footballing side, so a very good win
The positive thing is that Whitts doesn't really want to move from either the club or his Penarth home (why would he?) and would accept a reasonable deal that will see him into the last years of his career...
Hopefully, common ground can be found and the City legend stays!![]()
NW said shortly after he arrived that his biggest challenge was finding the best way of getting Whitts into the team. In his post match interview NW talked about the need to get "Legs" around Whitts, today that was Harris and Hoilett, but in the first half both didn't really provide Whitts with the support he needed. It was different in the 2nd half and Whitts came more to the fore and after winning his battle with the ginger player, Woods, it was fitting that Whitts scored the winning goal and was voted fans man of the match.
We shouldn't however forget the fantastic shifts Ralls and Gunnarsonn put in as both ran themselves to a standstill, and in the 2nd half the movement and intensity of both Harris and Hoilett was great.
I can't see Whitts starting against Wednesday, Halford will replace him, but against Forest I can see NW trying the same tactics as today.
As regards the contract situation I really believe it will be resolved, NW knows he has real quality in Whitts, quality that will cost a huge amount of money to replace.
![]()
![]()
Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:34 pm
Jonsey Jones wrote:Rocket at half time from Warnock. Much better 2nd half.
The ref today was shocking. Never gave us anything. The worst decision was when he gave offside against us and allowed their player to take the free kick in our half.
Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:21 am
Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:30 am
Forever Blue wrote::banghead:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Maybe, maybe not, but the guy still oozes class and can win games. Ralls can't touch him for creativity and he was the difference between winning and losing the game today.
I'm not bothered if he gets £8,000 or £12,000 personally as I'm not paying but I truly hope he stays.
Whitts is currently on £20,000 plus a week.
On his day Whitts is class I sgree.
But Whitts is getting older , legs tired and not consistent .
Warnock only has a small budget.
Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:39 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote::banghead:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Maybe, maybe not, but the guy still oozes class and can win games. Ralls can't touch him for creativity and he was the difference between winning and losing the game today.
I'm not bothered if he gets £8,000 or £12,000 personally as I'm not paying but I truly hope he stays.
Whitts is currently on £20,000 plus a week.
On his day Whitts is class I sgree.
But Whitts is getting older , legs tired and not consistent .
Warnock only has a small budget.
I know what his current wages are reported to be but to replace his class and creativity on 8,000 is almost impossible. That's why I'm not bothered if he's offered 10-12,000 grand on a one or two year contract especially considering all the wages we continue to waste on other players.
No, I don't think he will play every week but will consistently do a job when Warnock picks him due to the tactics involved game per game.
Sun Apr 09, 2017 4:35 pm
Forever Blue wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote::banghead:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Maybe, maybe not, but the guy still oozes class and can win games. Ralls can't touch him for creativity and he was the difference between winning and losing the game today.
I'm not bothered if he gets £8,000 or £12,000 personally as I'm not paying but I truly hope he stays.
Whitts is currently on £20,000 plus a week.
On his day Whitts is class I sgree.
But Whitts is getting older , legs tired and not consistent .
Warnock only has a small budget.
I know what his current wages are reported to be but to replace his class and creativity on 8,000 is almost impossible. That's why I'm not bothered if he's offered 10-12,000 grand on a one or two year contract especially considering all the wages we continue to waste on other players.
No, I don't think he will play every week but will consistently do a job when Warnock picks him due to the tactics involved game per game.
Whitts like I say is class on his day,but can only perform in my opinion say one in three games.
My worry is Warnock only has a small budget and Warnock likes players to be available and able to give everything for every game,
Sun Apr 09, 2017 6:26 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote::banghead:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:nubbsy wrote:A goal and am assist for Whitts. Makes you wonder if warnock could find a way to bring out his best or is his time here really over?
For me though Whitts can't do it week in week out.
Max wage £8,000 a week for next season
Maybe, maybe not, but the guy still oozes class and can win games. Ralls can't touch him for creativity and he was the difference between winning and losing the game today.
I'm not bothered if he gets £8,000 or £12,000 personally as I'm not paying but I truly hope he stays.
Whitts is currently on £20,000 plus a week.
On his day Whitts is class I sgree.
But Whitts is getting older , legs tired and not consistent .
Warnock only has a small budget.
I know what his current wages are reported to be but to replace his class and creativity on 8,000 is almost impossible. That's why I'm not bothered if he's offered 10-12,000 grand on a one or two year contract especially considering all the wages we continue to waste on other players.
No, I don't think he will play every week but will consistently do a job when Warnock picks him due to the tactics involved game per game.
Whitts like I say is class on his day,but can only perform in my opinion say one in three games.
My worry is Warnock only has a small budget and Warnock likes players to be available and able to give everything for every game,
Don't agree with your first sentence Annis but I agree with your second.
I'm sure Warnock loves him when he performs like yesterday as without him I doubt we'd have won but I'm not convinced he wants him to stay.
Sun Apr 09, 2017 7:44 pm
Clusterman wrote:The ref was indeed shocking throughout the game.
However regarding the positioning of a free kick for offside being in our own half the rule was changed at the start of the season where if a player is flagged for coming back from an offside position the free kick shall be taken from when he was penalised even if that is in his own half.
Former referee David Ellery states “Part of the law book says when players commit an offside offence you give a free-kick where the offence occurred. The other part of the law book says you give a free-kick where the player was when he was in the offside position. So a player can actually move 20 yards from being in an offside position … and it is only the moment he plays the ball that he is penalised. The law tells you to give the free-kick in two different places.
“So, in future, the free-kick will always be given where he commits the offside offence, even if he is in his own half, because you cannot be in an offside position in your own half, but you can go back into your own half to commit an offside offence.”
Sun Apr 09, 2017 7:53 pm