I might be imagining this but I seem to recall that somebody with a bit of knowledge of FFP rules recently posted that some of the parameters we have to operate within are calculated on the financial position over a rolling 36 month period. Is that correct ?
If it is then that would go a long way to explaining why things are currently so tight and why the aim, seemingly accepted by Warnock, is to get to June and then spend a bit.
36 months back from June 2017 would be June 2014; that was the summer of OGS buying every man and his dog for big fees and high wages. If that expenditure drops out of the equation plus the benefits of the clear out/rationalisation are seen then surely things will look a lot more rosey and give Warnock a real chance of making something significant happen