Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:26 pm

Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:30 pm

Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:32 pm
" CHAMPIONSHIP UPDATED WEDNESDAY 1ST FEBRUARY 2017 "
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:35 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:42 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:42 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:44 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:49 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:55 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:57 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:59 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:07 pm
bluebird58 wrote:Neil Warnock should HAVE been backed.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:09 pm
Reza wrote:..... if we say that warnock should have been backed you get a mouthful from fans saying we shouldnt be wasting money, ........
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:11 pm
polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:13 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:13 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:13 pm
polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:14 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:15 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:21 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:22 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
To be fair £300k is not millions. I agree, nobody can expect us to splash out big sums of money and to see the debt reduced at the same time. However, considering the players that have been offloaded, £300k does not seem an extortionate amount to ask for. I have no idea how desperate Warnock was for the player involved, but if he was unable to get £300k now, he is not likely to have much money available in the Summer either. I think he will be gone by the begining of June.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:23 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:28 pm
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:30 pm
polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:31 pm
Mr Ducie wrote:I do not see the point in spending £2-3 million on overpriced players when the target this season is now 4 wins from the remaining games.
I'm sure Neil Warnock will be backed next season.
What's more,other clubs excessive spending will come under scrutiny, when they fail to go up so they will be less of a threat.
Warnock himself has pretty much said the top two are as good as up so why spend big when only 1 further promotion place is available.
Let's not forget we had one of the biggest and highest paid squads in the Championship, and you only have to look at Aston Villa, to realise that spending big does not guarantee promotion.
I'm sure as soon as we reach 50 points a few of the new revamped development players will get game time and valuable experience.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:42 pm
Wayne S wrote:Reza wrote:..... if we say that warnock should have been backed you get a mouthful from fans saying we shouldnt be wasting money, ........
Otherwise known as a difference of opinion. That's all it is.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:45 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
To be fair £300k is not millions. I agree, nobody can expect us to splash out big sums of money and to see the debt reduced at the same time. However, considering the players that have been offloaded, £300k does not seem an extortionate amount to ask for. I have no idea how desperate Warnock was for the player involved, but if he was unable to get £300k now, he is not likely to have much money available in the Summer either. I think he will be gone by the begining of June.
He blamed fact we had a game last night on not getting a player in but same time he blamed the agent for not foning back, Other clubs signed players last night while playing so I don't think he was desperately wanting the player! !
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:50 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Mr Ducie wrote:I do not see the point in spending £2-3 million on overpriced players when the target this season is now 4 wins from the remaining games.
I'm sure Neil Warnock will be backed next season.
What's more,other clubs excessive spending will come under scrutiny, when they fail to go up so they will be less of a threat.
Warnock himself has pretty much said the top two are as good as up so why spend big when only 1 further promotion place is available.
Let's not forget we had one of the biggest and highest paid squads in the Championship, and you only have to look at Aston Villa, to realise that spending big does not guarantee promotion.
I'm sure as soon as we reach 50 points a few of the new revamped development players will get game time and valuable experience.
Joff, The players Warnock wanted now and for next season were about just over a mill for both.
The striker would of been perfect at £300,000
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:55 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
To be fair £300k is not millions. I agree, nobody can expect us to splash out big sums of money and to see the debt reduced at the same time. However, considering the players that have been offloaded, £300k does not seem an extortionate amount to ask for. I have no idea how desperate Warnock was for the player involved, but if he was unable to get £300k now, he is not likely to have much money available in the Summer either. I think he will be gone by the begining of June.
He blamed fact we had a game last night on not getting a player in but same time he blamed the agent for not foning back, Other clubs signed players last night while playing so I don't think he was desperately wanting the player! !
Allan, surely Warnock's priority last night was to get 3 points from our game, and to move us further away from trouble. Once he had identified the player (and most on here were quite enthusiastic that he would be a good addition to the team) would'nt there be people at the club doing all the backroom dealings in getting this player here. I doubt if Warnock would have been heavily involved in the ins and outs of the contract, and would have had little to do with the paperwork side of things. His main duty would probably have stretched to the photo calls and standing alongside the player as the contract was signed.
Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:56 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Make your mind up Annis.
You moan about the debt, you want Tan out yet you still moan when he doesnt give the manager millions to spend.
Double standards.
To be fair £300k is not millions. I agree, nobody can expect us to splash out big sums of money and to see the debt reduced at the same time. However, considering the players that have been offloaded, £300k does not seem an extortionate amount to ask for. I have no idea how desperate Warnock was for the player involved, but if he was unable to get £300k now, he is not likely to have much money available in the Summer either. I think he will be gone by the begining of June.
He blamed fact we had a game last night on not getting a player in but same time he blamed the agent for not foning back, Other clubs signed players last night while playing so I don't think he was desperately wanting the player! !