Mon Jan 02, 2017 6:54 pm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:02 pm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:15 pm
darran1927 wrote:Not in the squad at all, was he injured?
Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:24 pm
davids wrote:Injured at Brentford.
We certainly seemed much stronger physically in the midfield without Whitts, looking much quicker and winning a number of 50/50 balls which, to be frank, is not his strong point.
However, I thought our dead ball delivery was poor today with Bennett in particular finding it impossible to get the ball past the first defender.
Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:47 pm
wez1927 wrote:davids wrote:Injured at Brentford.
We certainly seemed much stronger physically in the midfield without Whitts, looking much quicker and winning a number of 50/50 balls which, to be frank, is not his strong point.
However, I thought our dead ball delivery was poor today with Bennett in particular finding it impossible to get the ball past the first defender.
Much better without whitts
Mon Jan 02, 2017 11:54 pm
Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:06 am
Mr Shed wrote:I'd still rather Whitts instead of Ralls.
Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:45 am
Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:11 am
piledriver64 wrote:Playing Bamba in midfield against a team that certainly wasn't looking to shut up shop worked very well. However, if Villa had scored first or held us out then Bamba and Gunnarsson are not the answer in terms of creativity.
What I like about Warnock is that he changes the team and tactics to suite the opposition. Even if Whitts had been fit Warnock might have made that change in any event. However, he will know very well that playing Bamba and Gunnarsson in midfield against Burton at home, a game we need to win, is just not an option that will work.
Whittingham has been our most creative player all season (one of the most creative in the Championship on stats), has chipped in with his fair share of goals and also topped the distance run in a number of games. He is first choice on merit.
Ralls has been poor all season until the last couple of games yet all of a sudden people want him in the team instead of Whitts![]()
Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:16 am
troobloo3339 wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Playing Bamba in midfield against a team that certainly wasn't looking to shut up shop worked very well. However, if Villa had scored first or held us out then Bamba and Gunnarsson are not the answer in terms of creativity.
What I like about Warnock is that he changes the team and tactics to suite the opposition. Even if Whitts had been fit Warnock might have made that change in any event. However, he will know very well that playing Bamba and Gunnarsson in midfield against Burton at home, a game we need to win, is just not an option that will work.
Whittingham has been our most creative player all season (one of the most creative in the Championship on stats), has chipped in with his fair share of goals and also topped the distance run in a number of games. He is first choice on merit.
Ralls has been poor all season until the last couple of games yet all of a sudden people want him in the team instead of Whitts![]()
ralls has been poor all season not in my oppinion yes he has a dip in form but you answered the reason why some want him playing with your comment untill the last couple of games imo thats whats been wrong with us too often we keep picking players out of form .ralls is back in form and should stay in the team unless he has another dip .
Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:15 am
piledriver64 wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Playing Bamba in midfield against a team that certainly wasn't looking to shut up shop worked very well. However, if Villa had scored first or held us out then Bamba and Gunnarsson are not the answer in terms of creativity.
What I like about Warnock is that he changes the team and tactics to suite the opposition. Even if Whitts had been fit Warnock might have made that change in any event. However, he will know very well that playing Bamba and Gunnarsson in midfield against Burton at home, a game we need to win, is just not an option that will work.
Whittingham has been our most creative player all season (one of the most creative in the Championship on stats), has chipped in with his fair share of goals and also topped the distance run in a number of games. He is first choice on merit.
Ralls has been poor all season until the last couple of games yet all of a sudden people want him in the team instead of Whitts![]()
ralls has been poor all season not in my oppinion yes he has a dip in form but you answered the reason why some want him playing with your comment untill the last couple of games imo thats whats been wrong with us too often we keep picking players out of form .ralls is back in form and should stay in the team unless he has another dip .
But are you saying it's OK for Whitts to be dropped despite no dip in form ?
Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:46 am