Is whitts a modern day Jekyll and hyde

Great free kicks and corners today
But then ruins his performance with inept tackling and stupid mistakes in defence and decision making

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

What exactly have I said that is not fact
Just saying what I saw today

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

What a great post.
Whitts didn't have the best of games today in my opinion and I just knew the forum fool would jump on it.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

Is he still the 'mesia'? Sweet Baby Jesus.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

You're right and when you mention the superb pass made to Hoilett from Whitts which led to the goal, he was then virtually on the goal line when Hoilett scored which disproves his 'lazyness'. Whitts could easily have stood admiring his pass instead.

As well as the original poster not being able to understand each player strength's, as you say, he also has a blind dislike for a player which speaks volumes about his knowledge.

I thought all midfield played well today. Only thing I thought we were lacking was Stuart okeefe on the bench to give us fresh legs in the middle for last 10.

As the forum fool I must to all your superior football knowledge , however some of you need a lesson in what the word oppinion actually means , and then show some respect to fans whos oppinions differs to yours, debate by all means (thought that was the point of forums ) but why name call and show disrespect

How can you respect the opinion of someone who can't even spell the word ffs

How can you respect the opinion of someone who can't even spell the word ffs

Your wrong again polo I can spell the word see I just spelt the word you said I could not spell your a fool you are !

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=179559

How can you respect the opinion of someone who can't even spell the word ffs

Your wrong again polo I can spell the word see I just spelt the word you said I could not spell your a fool you are !

What?!?! Can we have the in English Steve

Bit early on a Monday morning to be pissed. I hope youre not driving today.

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=179559

Annis, stats are too easy to prove this guy wrong!
When someone like him has a blind dislike for a player firmly set in his mind, he's unable or unwilling to accept he's wrong yet he talks about debate.
If you watch Whitts now it's easy to see he's added more work rate to his game as well.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

You're right and when you mention the superb pass made to Hoilett from Whitts which led to the goal, he was then virtually on the goal line when Hoilett scored which disproves his 'lazyness'. Whitts could easily have stood admiring his pass instead.

As well as the original poster not being able to understand each player strength's, as you say, he also has a blind dislike for a player which speaks volumes about his knowledge.

Well My knowledge of the game knows that whitts was as you say virtually on the goal line but you fail to mention he was actually in an offside position ,thankfully Hoilett finished it well and whitts didn't get any touch on it ,but what do I know I'm just the forum idiot

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

You're right and when you mention the superb pass made to Hoilett from Whitts which led to the goal, he was then virtually on the goal line when Hoilett scored which disproves his 'lazyness'. Whitts could easily have stood admiring his pass instead.

As well as the original poster not being able to understand each player strength's, as you say, he also has a blind dislike for a player which speaks volumes about his knowledge.

Well My knowledge of the game knows that whitts was as you say virtually on the goal line but you fail to mention he was actually in an offside position ,thankfully Hoilett finished it well and whitts didn't get any touch on it ,but what do I know I'm just the forum idiot

Oh and he pissed about in defence losing the ball for them to score Thier second goal but I'm just the forum idiot

This is not the take away i had from the game on Saturday, it was a great home win played with spirit. But why was Gunnarson whose job it is to protect the back four on his arse for both their goals ?

I didn't run home and make a thread up about it, its a team game and they all have jobs to do, Whitts is there to make goals Gunnars to stop goals.

This is not the take away i had from the game on Saturday, it was a great home win played with spirit. But why was Gunnarson whose job it is to protect the back four on his arse for both their goals ?

I didn't run home and make a thread up about it, its a team game and they all have jobs to do, Whitts is there to make goals Gunnars to stop goals.

Wasn't it Gunnarson who lost the ball for the first goal?

He just has a vendetta with whitts now.

This is not the take away i had from the game on Saturday, it was a great home win played with spirit. But why was Gunnarson whose job it is to protect the back four on his arse for both their goals ?

I didn't run home and make a thread up about it, its a team game and they all have jobs to do, Whitts is there to make goals Gunnars to stop goals.

Wasn't it Gunnarson who lost the ball for the first goal?

My recollection was gunnar charged out, was out of position and tried to make the tackle from the wrong side, lost and ended up on his arse. Whitts, Ralls & Pilkington were trying to cover, but thats only their secondary role. Gunnar lost his battle and they scored.

This is not the take away i had from the game on Saturday, it was a great home win played with spirit. But why was Gunnarson whose job it is to protect the back four on his arse for both their goals ?

I didn't run home and make a thread up about it, its a team game and they all have jobs to do, Whitts is there to make goals Gunnars to stop goals.

Wasn't it Gunnarson who lost the ball for the first goal?

My recollection was gunnar charged out, was out of position and tried to make the tackle from the wrong side, lost and ended up on his arse. Whitts, Ralls & Pilkington were trying to cover, but thats only their secondary role. Gunnar lost his battle and they scored.

Was ill Saturday so didn't go so I've only seen a quick replay. Every player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager will hide the weaknesses while bringing out the strengths of a squad

He just has a vendetta with whitts now.

Exactly.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

You're right and when you mention the superb pass made to Hoilett from Whitts which led to the goal, he was then virtually on the goal line when Hoilett scored which disproves his 'lazyness'. Whitts could easily have stood admiring his pass instead.

As well as the original poster not being able to understand each player strength's, as you say, he also has a blind dislike for a player which speaks volumes about his knowledge.

Well My knowledge of the game knows that whitts was as you say virtually on the goal line but you fail to mention he was actually in an offside position ,thankfully Hoilett finished it well and whitts didn't get any touch on it ,but what do I know I'm just the forum idiot

And with these posts you're proving that you are.
My point was - to prove Whitts is not the useless lazy player to constantly say he is. It doesn't matter about offside or not just his movement and desire.

And he lost the ball? Who doesn't occasionally?
Perhaps you should rush on here after the next game and make a thread about Bamba or somebody if he makes a mistake that leads to a goal.
You are so bigoted it's unbelievable.

This is not the take away i had from the game on Saturday, it was a great home win played with spirit. But why was Gunnarson whose job it is to protect the back four on his arse for both their goals ?

I didn't run home and make a thread up about it, its a team game and they all have jobs to do, Whitts is there to make goals Gunnars to stop goals.

Wasn't it Gunnarson who lost the ball for the first goal?

My recollection was gunnar charged out, was out of position and tried to make the tackle from the wrong side, lost and ended up on his arse. Whitts, Ralls & Pilkington were trying to cover, but thats only their secondary role. Gunnar lost his battle and they scored.

Was ill Saturday so didn't go so I've only seen a quick replay. Every player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager will hide the weaknesses while bringing out the strengths of a squad

Spot on, like Warnock said he needs to get the blend right.

Its like bloody groundhog day !!!!!

If he could do what you want as well as what he does he wouldn't be tossing around in the championship.

Here is a question for you

Gunnerson

Great at waving his hands and giving his all
But then ruins his performance with inept passing and stupid mistakes

If you could morph Whitts and Gunnar they'd be in a top 4 team

I'm sure your remarks about Gunnarsson are tongue in cheek. We all know he does a lot more than just "move his arms about", that is, except when he's delivering a superb attacking long throw. Some of his passes and goal attempts have been excellent, particularly this term. I'm not sure there's any footballer who doesn't make stupid mistakes!

To a degree

In the first half i thought Gunnarson was really poor at his job in the team. Often he was ahead of the ball and out of position. On the other hand Whitts did his role in the team, released Holliet for the second and put the ball onto Morrisons head for the first as well as a multitude of great passes.

My response was more about the original posters inability to understand that each player has strengths and weaknesses and a good manager tries to hide the weakness and accentuate the positives.

You're right and when you mention the superb pass made to Hoilett from Whitts which led to the goal, he was then virtually on the goal line when Hoilett scored which disproves his 'lazyness'. Whitts could easily have stood admiring his pass instead.

As well as the original poster not being able to understand each player strength's, as you say, he also has a blind dislike for a player which speaks volumes about his knowledge.

Well My knowledge of the game knows that whitts was as you say virtually on the goal line but you fail to mention he was actually in an offside position ,thankfully Hoilett finished it well and whitts didn't get any touch on it ,but what do I know I'm just the forum idiot

And with these posts you're proving that you are.
My point was - to prove Whitts is not the useless lazy player to constantly say he is. It doesn't matter about offside or not just his movement and desire.

And he lost the ball? Who doesn't occasionally?
Perhaps you should rush on here after the next game and make a thread about Bamba or somebody if he makes a mistake that leads to a goal.
You are so bigoted it's unbelievable.

I read the other day, I think Warnock said it thay he covered more than 12km in one recent game. More than anyone else on the pitch.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LTKORcr1jhY

Substitute Steve for Gordon

He just has a vendetta with whitts now.

Why don't you read the post ffs
Great free kicks and corners I said
Is that not praise enough ffs

How can you respect the opinion of someone who can't even spell the word ffs

Your wrong again polo I can spell the word see I just spelt the word you said I could not spell your a fool you are !

What?!?! Can we have the in English Steve

Bit early on a Monday morning to be pissed. I hope youre not driving today.

Polo think you've had a mare here questioning my English can we have THE in English Steve
Oh and I run a small transport company of my own ,so drinking and driving is a defo no no

He just has a vendetta with whitts now.

Why don't you read the post ffs
Great free kicks and corners I said
Is that not praise enough ffs

Perhaps you should read your own posts before pressing the submit button? ???