at last a manager that can

At last a manager that can see in a battle whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot
today at newcastle it will be backs to the wall and all hands on deck
and we will need to battle for every ball especially in the middle of the park
so I say well done warnock in todays selection of puting whitts on the bench

Hello Mr Negative

You're blinded by your hatred towards Whitts but, today Warnock has gone defensive and can't blame him for that. Whitts will be back in for Huddersfield.

Hello Mr Negative

haha trust you to see my positive post as a negative annis

At last a manager that can see in a battle whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot
today at newcastle it will be backs to the wall and all hands on deck
and we will need to battle for every ball especially in the middle of the park
so I say well done warnock in todays selection of puting whitts on the bench

Absolutely correct

You're blinded by your hatred towards Whitts but, today Warnock has gone defensive and can't blame him for that. Whitts will be back in for Huddersfield.

norms I dont hate anyone least of all a cardiff city player
im sorry idont rate whitts anymore , like somedo on here
my opinion of whittsbis different to yours
I watch home and away , and have been accused on here by lots who say I know nothing about football , I just believe whitts is past it ,
many good players get older look at whats happening with rooney as an example it's just people's oppinions

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

........

Award for the "I really don't know what I am talking about "........goes to..

At last a manager that can see in a battle whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot
today at newcastle it will be backs to the wall and all hands on deck
and we will need to battle for every ball especially in the middle of the park
so I say well done warnock in todays selection of puting whitts on the bench

What was you saying about Whitts again?

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

What world are you living in Steve?

..."at last a manager that in a battle can see whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot" - well if that doesn't translate into "Warnock thinks whitts is shit" then I'm really lost. What point exactly were you trying to make by that comment?

Oh and look who's just popped up with a goal.

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

What world are you living in Steve?

..."at last a manager that in a battle can see whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot" - well if that doesn't translate into "Warnock thinks whitts is shit" then I'm really lost. What point exactly were you trying to make by that comment?

Oh and look who's just popped up with a goal.

And Whitts has scored 3/5 under Warnock. He rates Whitts and Steve cannot see that. Warnock went with a defensive set up today and looked what happened first half.

Like it or not Steve, Whitts is very important to us. I'm with Nubs here.

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

What world are you living in Steve?

..."at last a manager that in a battle can see whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot" - well if that doesn't translate into "Warnock thinks whitts is shit" then I'm really lost. What point exactly were you trying to make by that comment?

Oh and look who's just popped up with a goal.

And Whitts has scored 3/5 under Warnock. He rates Whitts and Steve cannot see that. Warnock went with a defensive set up today and looked what happened first half.

Like it or not Steve, Whitts is very important to us. I'm with Nubs here.

So am I. Nubbsy looks like he's forgotten more about football than you'll ever know.
Class doesn't go away as Whitts has proved yet again.
This guy has been shown again to be naive when it it comes to football knowledge.

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

What world are you living in Steve?

..."at last a manager that in a battle can see whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot" - well if that doesn't translate into "Warnock thinks whitts is shit" then I'm really lost. What point exactly were you trying to make by that comment?

Oh and look who's just popped up with a goal.

And Whitts has scored 3/5 under Warnock. He rates Whitts and Steve cannot see that. Warnock went with a defensive set up today and looked what happened first half.

Like it or not Steve, Whitts is very important to us. I'm with Nubs here.

So am I. Nubbsy looks like he's forgotten more about football than you'll ever know.
Class doesn't go away as Whitts has proved yet again.
This guy has been shown again to be naive when it it comes to football knowledge.

He's not the only one on here who does'nt appear to know much about football. We had certain posters going for a City win today when the drunks in my local pub who hardly follow football had this as a home banker. You often see some unbelievable predictions on here, and you would think that members of a football forum would have some knowledge of the game.

The tactical genius strikes again! Trust you to think because hes made a change that he doesn't rate whitts.
It's obvious it's a tactical change, whitts has strengths and weaknesses and Richardson has been brought in because he will bring pace to the midfield in a game that we will most likely be chasing the ball.

Typical crap from you nubbsy
making up something not said
where do I say he doesnt rate whitts
however he clearly doesnt fancy him for todays game

What world are you living in Steve?

..."at last a manager that in a battle can see whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot" - well if that doesn't translate into "Warnock thinks whitts is shit" then I'm really lost. What point exactly were you trying to make by that comment?

Oh and look who's just popped up with a goal.

And Whitts has scored 3/5 under Warnock. He rates Whitts and Steve cannot see that. Warnock went with a defensive set up today and looked what happened first half.

Like it or not Steve, Whitts is very important to us. I'm with Nubs here.

So am I. Nubbsy looks like he's forgotten more about football than you'll ever know.
Class doesn't go away as Whitts has proved yet again.
This guy has been shown again to be naive when it it comes to football knowledge.

He's not the only one on here who does'nt appear to know much about football. We had certain posters going for a City win today when the drunks in my local pub who hardly follow football had this as a home banker. You often see some unbelievable predictions on here, and you would think that members of a football forum would have some knowledge of the game.

As usual, I agree with your posts Steve.
Wez constantly banging on recently about being only 6 points off the play offs thinking that if we win two games we're there and not even realising that the teams around us will win games as well.
Posters going mental when Lambert signed thinking he's going to net 20 goals this season .....

Also a game where set pieces would've been important but Ralls delivery was shocking.

At last a manager that can see in a battle whitts is as much use as a chocolate tea pot
today at newcastle it will be backs to the wall and all hands on deck
and we will need to battle for every ball especially in the middle of the park
so I say well done warnock in todays selection of puting whitts on the bench

Totally agree Steve

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

Norms, I agree. And I didn't have any problem with whitts starting on the bench today either. I thought it was a smart tactical move for multiple reasons. If Tonteg pulls his head out of his arse for 30 seconds and reads my post he'll see specifically what I didn't agree with in the OP.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

Norms, I agree. And I didn't have any problem with whitts starting on the bench today either. I thought it was a smart tactical move for multiple reasons. If Tonteg pulls his head out of his arse for 30 seconds and reads my post he'll see specifically what I didn't agree with in the OP.

Where did I say my post was directed at you? I agree with you that it was a good tactical decision. I've said that in my post if you actually bothered to read it properly.

Maybe YOU should pull your head out of your arse and stop ganging up with your boyfriend(s) insulting others. I have a similar opinion to you but because of your determination to suck up to norms, you've made yourself look a bit of an idiot.

I never abuse anyone on this forum but I've seen the OP getting unfairly slated here and now you've chosen to make a childish comment about me because I've stuck up for the OP with an opinion which is actually very similar to your own opinion. I think this is where I will call it a night.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

Seem to love having a pop at you?

Shut up with your conspiracy theories will you. I've got one account and always have done, I don't need anyone else's help to tell someone what I think if I think they're talking nonsense, I don't gang up on anyone, what you think this is? A school yard?!

I responded to your post as you were clearly having a pop at everyone that didn't agree with Troobloos dislike of Whitts. It's not just today's decision(which I thought was correct by the way) not to start Whitts and go more defensive. It's the constant Whitts bashing by you for one and troobloo, means that we're pointing fingers now.

Get your head out your arse ffs I couldn't give a shit what you say and I've never debated anything with you as you seem to like pretending to be the forums football guru. I cannot take anything you say seriously mate.(you proved that when you referred to me as nubbsys boyfriend).

I'm not one of the worst for giving criticism to other posters, I speak my mind & think you're full of shit. I have an opinion and if it's different to others, I'll speak my mind.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

Seem to love having a pop at you?


Shut up with your conspiracy theories will you. I've got one account and always have done, I don't need anyone else's help to tell someone what I think if I think they're talking nonsense, I don't gang up on anyone, what you think this is? A school yard?

I responded to your post as you were clearly having a pop at everyone that didn't agree with Troobloos dislike of Whitts. It's not just today's decision(which I thought was correct by the way) not to start Whitts and go more defensive. It's the constant Whitts bashing by you for one and troobloo, means that we're pointing fingers now.

Get your head out your arse ffs I couldn't give a shit what you say and I've never debated anything with you as you seem to like pretending to be the forums football guru. I cannot take anything you say seriously mate.

I'm not one of the worst for giving criticism to other posters, I speak my mind & think you're full of shit, I have an opinion and if it's different to others I'll speak my mind.

Spot on Norms.
I also think it was a good decision tactically to rest Whitts for this game.
As it happens it seems to be the wrong one though as Richardson was pretty useless and didn't perform according to match reports.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

Seem to love having a pop at you?

I responded to your post as you were clearly having a pop at everyone that didn't agree with Troobloos dislike of Whitts. It's not just today's decision(which I thought was correct by the way) not to start Whitts and go more defensive. It's the constant Whitts bashing by you for one and troobloo, means that we're pointing fingers now.

Get your head out your arse ffs I couldn't give a shit what you say and I've never debated anything with you as you seem to like pretending to be the forums football guru. I cannot take anything you say seriously mate.

Can you show me where I'm one of the worst for giving criticism to other posters please? Otherwise you're full of shit. I have an opinion and if it's different to others I'll speak my mind.

Spot on Norms.
I also think it was a good decision tactically to rest Whitts for this game.
As it happens it seems to be the wrong one though as Richardson was pretty useless and didn't perform according to match reports.

He'll be back in for Huddersfield at home mate, he's got 3 goals in 5 for Warnock, people can say what they want as I believe he's a very important player for us and when he's gone perhaps people will actually see what a legend the man is. He's the best midfielder I've ever seen in a City shirt and a fantastic servant to Cardiff, which is rare in football these days.

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

Well done for sticking up to the Whittingham police Tont

The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.

What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.

6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.

You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).

You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.

Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.

Well done for sticking up to the Whittingham police Tont

If sticking up for a club legend like Whitts against the constant bashing from some on here qualifies me as the 'Whittingham police' then so be it.

He's the one player I would have picked given the way the team was setup. When you're going to stifle a team and try hit on the break then you need a player who create something along with two wide men who can run. We didn't have anyone to play that out ball and the wide men didn't go direct enough when they got the ball.

RB said he'd watched us and that was clear to see as they doubled up on our wide men quickly when we got into the final third. Had we been more direct in those areas when the chance arose then they wouldn't have got time to do that.

That's my opinion anyway!

Tonteg talking about sensible posts

Is this the same guy who said Simon Moore, Steven Caulker, Jordon Mutch and Frazier Campbell were the future spine of the England team?

Jordon Mutch was a better player than Michael Carrick

Malky could go on to manage Man United

Tan was to blame for Wigan getting relegated

Sensible posts be fucked

Stick to alien conspiracies you pleb.