Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:08 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:11 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:16 pm
RICK+CCFC wrote:Looks awesome. What will the capacity be now?
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:16 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:18 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:19 pm
cardiffred wrote:Looking great that! Makes you wonder what NP could have been like if that had been redevolped. The old Bob Bank would have awesome if it has been all seated and two tiered.![]()
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:34 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:48 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:56 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:58 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:cardiffred wrote:Looking great that! Makes you wonder what NP could have been like if that had been redevolped. The old Bob Bank would have awesome if it has been all seated and two tiered.![]()
I always wanted Ninian Park to be redeveloped
Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:09 pm
RICK+CCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:cardiffred wrote:Looking great that! Makes you wonder what NP could have been like if that had been redevolped. The old Bob Bank would have awesome if it has been all seated and two tiered.![]()
I always wanted Ninian Park to be redeveloped
Didn't Sam Hammam say that there was a contingency plan for NP to be re developed in the event of the planning permission not being granted for the CCS?
I'm guessing that if that event ever happened, the cost for an existing re development might have been more, than that for a new, relocated build???
Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:28 pm
Forever Blue wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:cardiffred wrote:Looking great that! Makes you wonder what NP could have been like if that had been redevolped. The old Bob Bank would have awesome if it has been all seated and two tiered.![]()
I always wanted Ninian Park to be redeveloped
Didn't Sam Hammam say that there was a contingency plan for NP to be re developed in the event of the planning permission not being granted for the CCS?
I'm guessing that if that event ever happened, the cost for an existing re development might have been more, than that for a new, relocated build???
Yes there was.
The reason we had the new stadium was that no one had the money to redevelop Ninian Park, but with the new stadium it was funded by the shopping development etc
Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:40 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:08 pm
RICK+CCFC wrote:Looks awesome. What will the capacity be now?
Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:12 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:14 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:cardiffred wrote:Looking great that! Makes you wonder what NP could have been like if that had been redevolped. The old Bob Bank would have awesome if it has been all seated and two tiered.![]()
I always wanted Ninian Park to be redeveloped
Didn't Sam Hammam say that there was a contingency plan for NP to be re developed in the event of the planning permission not being granted for the CCS?
I'm guessing that if that event ever happened, the cost for an existing re development might have been more, than that for a new, relocated build???
Yes there was.
The reason we had the new stadium was that no one had the money to redevelop Ninian Park, but with the new stadium it was funded by the shopping development etc
From what I remember there were also access issues given the location of Ninian with Sloper Road one side and the railway at the back, even ignoring the residential housing each end.
The bigger the stadium the wider the outside walkways, concourses need to be, etc. without even touching upon car parking.
The cost of re-directing Sloper Rd or the railway would have been even more than the Riddlers fish tank !!
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:07 pm
wiltshirebluebird wrote:Am I the only one who thinks Anfield looks a bit of a hotch potch. Think the new Spurs ground will look much better (yes I know, costs a lot more).
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:54 pm
wiltshirebluebird wrote:Am I the only one who thinks Anfield looks a bit of a hotch potch. Think the new Spurs ground will look much better (yes I know, costs a lot more).
Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:16 am
Sun Sep 11, 2016 9:35 am
Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:14 am