Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

' David Marshall / Bruno Manga? '

Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:41 pm

Why Cardiff City should have sold Bruno Manga to raise funds, not fans' favourite and captain David Marshall

Friday 2nd September 2016


BY SCOTT JOHNSON


It's not a good time to be selling your best player and I hope Marshall is replaced quicker than it took to find a competent successor to Neil Alexander



Manga would not have been as big a miss as Marshall

In February, Vincent Tan held a Q&A session, Welcome to lunch with Vincent, with special invited guests and touched upon a range of subjects.

One of which was David Marshall’s future at Cardiff.

“We could have sold David Marshall for £7million, played Simon Moore in goal, got someone else in as back up,” Tan revealed.

“Why didn’t we take the money? Because we want to go to the Premier League and David’s a big part of that.

"Arsenal and another Premier League club wanted him to go there. His salary would have gone up, people around the world would have seen him play at the highest level.

"Yet we had to tell him ‘Sorry, we’re not letting you go’."

That was then, this is today after Cardiff failed to make the play-offs.

Six months on, Marshall has departed for less than that amount and without being adequately replaced, too.

Ben Amos has arrived on loan, but Bolton’s number two is no match for Scotland’s number one.


Unfortunately in this particular scenario, I feel everyone has lost. Cardiff have sold a prized asset at a reduced price, Paul Trollope has lost his captain and an integral player and supporters are left to mourn the absence of a firm favourite.

With respect to Hull, Marshall has also ended up at an inferior destination as a result of staying loyal to Cardiff City.

In my opinion, it is a transfer that has undermined Cardiff’s play-off prospects and has also been compounded by the departure of Moore. Deciding to sell your first and second choice goalkeepers within the final two weeks of the transfer window is a rather remarkable statement, when you think about it.

A similar thing happened in January, when Cardiff shed pretty much their whole strike force, shipping out Kenwyne Jones, Joe Mason and Alex Revell. They also lost Tony Watt, who was on loan and set to sign permanently the same day that the club were slapped with a transfer ban.

Russell Slade was expected to get the team in the top six then. Paul Trollope will be expected to this time.

Fabio has been another disappointing departure, but he was heading out of contract and the deal did at least appear to make good business sense.


Marshall did not appear to be angling for a move and personally I feel if the club needed to cash in on a player, it should have been Bruno Ecuele Manga.

An expensive acquisition, he has entered the final year of his contract and appears unlikely to agree an extension. Cardiff have cover in his position and his departure would not have disrupted Trollope’s grand design.

At Cardiff, it has often been one extreme or the other. Feast or famine. Everyone is well aware that the club is paying the price for past indulgences in the transfer market and are cost cutting to avoid further punishments.

To be fair, Cardiff have still managed to make some smart signings recently. Rickie Lambert, Jazz Richards, Lex Immers and Emyr Huws are solid acquisitions, in spite of the restrictions.

But I think that part of the problem is that Cardiff no more give anything away with regards to transfer fees paid out. We know what they have received for departing players, but how much did Immers, Huws or Kenneth Zohore cost? Who knows?

In light of the last few years, you can understand why they are so reluctant to divulge precise sums, at a time where undisclosed transfer fees are the rage.

Who would you have sold first?
David Marshall
Bruno Manga
Neither of them


However, it works two ways. It may suit to withhold this sort of information, but supporters are also in the dark as to whether the club is actually spending any money. Has the Mason fee been reinvested in terms of transfer fees? Again, who knows.

Cardiff can’t legislate for their peers spending unsustainable, Financial Fair Play-baiting amounts to try and reach the Premier League, but they have to give themselves the best possible chance of making a little go a fair way.

Their dealings in 2016 may have steadied the ship, but there is a danger it has also set the team back. I remember how much time it took to suitably replace Neil Alexander with Marshall.

To me when so much is underwhelming, from the football on offer to the managerial appointments, it is probably not the best time to sell your best player.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: ' David Marshall / Bruno Manga? '

Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:03 pm

I'm pretty sure the club would have been delighted to sell both Marshall and Manga if they could but it seems as if there was no real interest in Bruno for whatever reason.

I think Bruno is a great player at our level but any scouts who had been to see him would undoubtedly have noticed that he usually makes at least one howler every game - you just can't get away with that at a higher level.

I thought he'd be gone at the start of last season so I'm glad we've got another season and a half, maybe two from him but I would agree that if there was a choice between seeling him and Marshall we should have kept Marshall.

We have decent cover at centre half but I worry that the goalkeeping position is going to end up costing us this season.

Re: ' David Marshall / Bruno Manga? '

Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:06 pm

Is there not a major flaw in this story? Nobody else wanted Manga, and no bids were made. Of course it would have made sense to sell him before his contract runs down. But, the first necessity in any sale is to have a potential buyer placing a bid on the table.

Re: ' David Marshall / Bruno Manga? '

Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:08 pm

davids wrote:I'm pretty sure the club would have been delighted to sell both Marshall and Manga if they could but it seems as if there was no real interest in Bruno for whatever reason.

I think Bruno is a great player at our level but any scouts who had been to see him would undoubtedly have noticed that he usually makes at least one howler every game - you just can't get away with that at a higher level.

I thought he'd be gone at the start of last season so I'm glad we've got another season and a half, maybe two from him but I would agree that if there was a choice between seeling him and Marshall we should have kept Marshall.

We have decent cover at centre half but I worry that the goalkeeping position is going to end up costing us this season.


Correct David, We were lucky City never received one offer for Bruno Manga.

Re: ' David Marshall / Bruno Manga? '

Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:15 pm

selling goalkeepers is about timing, like it is with managers moving.

if a couple of teams need a new GK and you get a bidding war, you get top dollar. if there is only one team, then if you are a willing seller, you could be exploited. and we were, even the full £5m is a low fee in this market when you look at the ridiculous money being chucked around for very average players. £2.5m is an insult. however, the people running this club both now, and historically, are not accomplished negotiators and consequently we rarely get top fees for our assets.

as for manga, if we got a reasonable offer it is clear we would have sold him. he will now see out his contract and we will not get a fee, unless we can find a buyer in january.