' LEX IMMERS INJURED ? '

Lex Immers looked to be carrying an injury yesterday, he weren't running freely in fact his movement was not his usual self, it looked like a thigh injury to his left leg or possibly a dead leg.

Hopefully it is not too much of an issue and if he is carrying an injury then again I hope that it has not got worse from yesterday's game.

Immers would be a big loss to this team with our limited options up front.

image.jpeg

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Carl he was Suffering from a dead leg he got on wed according to reports.

PT said he was being assessed for a dead leg on Wednesday. You could see something was playing him up yesterday and it got worse as the game went on.

PT said he was being assessed for a dead leg on Wednesday. You could see something was playing him up yesterday and it got worse as the game went on.

if that's the case it's poor management should of rested him and brought huws in.

PT said he was being assessed for a dead leg on Wednesday. You could see something was playing him up yesterday and it got worse as the game went on.

if that's the case it's poor management should of rested him and brought huws in.

Not poor management at all, he was assessed for a dead leg, and passed the assessment. Trollope would have more than likely asked him if he wanted to be rested (Like every manager in that position) and the Immers refused because he was feeling good enough to play. Also Huws isn't ready to start games yet, and if he'd played he would have most probably pulled up around the 50/60 minute mark

PT said he was being assessed for a dead leg on Wednesday. You could see something was playing him up yesterday and it got worse as the game went on.

if that's the case it's poor management should of rested him and brought huws in.

Not poor management at all, he was assessed for a dead leg, and passed the assessment. Trollope would have more than likely asked him if he wanted to be rested (Like every manager in that position) and the Immers refused because he was feeling good enough to play. Also Huws isn't ready to start games yet, and if he'd played he would have most probably pulled up around the 50/60 minute mark

it don't matter what he passed if he was the slightest injured then in my opinion he should of been rested before it got worst it's not as if we haven't got replacements.

PT said he was being assessed for a dead leg on Wednesday. You could see something was playing him up yesterday and it got worse as the game went on.

if that's the case it's poor management should of rested him and brought huws in.

Not poor management at all, he was assessed for a dead leg, and passed the assessment. Trollope would have more than likely asked him if he wanted to be rested (Like every manager in that position) and the Immers refused because he was feeling good enough to play. Also Huws isn't ready to start games yet, and if he'd played he would have most probably pulled up around the 50/60 minute mark

it don't matter what he passed if he was the slightest injured then in my opinion he should of been rested before it got worst it's not as if we haven't got replacements.

We've got no like for like replacement for Immers.

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

so why didn't he play to his full standard and looked injured? Just cause he passed some assessment doesn't mean he's fully fit just means he was fit enough to play

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

so why didn't he play to his full standard and looked injured? Just cause he passed some assessment doesn't mean he's fully fit just means he was fit enough to play

Yeah but it also doesn't mean not to play him.

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

so why didn't he play to his full standard and looked injured? Just cause he passed some assessment doesn't mean he's fully fit just means he was fit enough to play

Yeah but it also doesn't mean not to play him.

i wouldn't of risked him for more or less a full match though he's to much of a important player to lose

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

so why didn't he play to his full standard and looked injured? Just cause he passed some assessment doesn't mean he's fully fit just means he was fit enough to play

Yeah but it also doesn't mean not to play him.

i wouldn't of risked him for more or less a full match though he's to much of a important player to lose

Yeah but to be fair a dead leg is just bruising, it was prob aggravated but it will heal easy enough it's not like a pulled muscle.

The best way to heal a dead leg is to keep as active as possible.

Doesn't matter if he passes or the assessment or not? If he is deemed fit to play then there is no reason why we shouldn't play him.

so why didn't he play to his full standard and looked injured? Just cause he passed some assessment doesn't mean he's fully fit just means he was fit enough to play

Yeah but it also doesn't mean not to play him.

i wouldn't of risked him for more or less a full match though he's to much of a important player to lose

Yeah but to be fair a dead leg is just bruising, it was prob aggravated but it will heal easy enough it's not like a pulled muscle.

thats fair enough

The best way to heal a dead leg is to keep as active as possible.