We have no threat up front
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:42 pm
The football was dire tonight , we are going to really struggle if we keep playing like this 
.
.
Re: We have no threat up front
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:49 pm
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: We have no threat up front
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:50 pm
Very slow and ponderous tonight as we were on Sunday.
Constant passing sideways and backwards without any creativity or penetration. First option for almost all players was to look backwards.
Completely devoid of ideas in the final third and lost count of the times we passed the ball along the back four, into midfield, back to the back four and as soon as we got bored we gave the ball away.
Six and a half hours now without a City player scoring a goal.
But we won!
Thanks Duffy!
Constant passing sideways and backwards without any creativity or penetration. First option for almost all players was to look backwards.
Completely devoid of ideas in the final third and lost count of the times we passed the ball along the back four, into midfield, back to the back four and as soon as we got bored we gave the ball away.
Six and a half hours now without a City player scoring a goal.
But we won!
Thanks Duffy!
Re: We have no threat up front
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:52 pm
mallo wrote::bluescarf:
Can't be right.
Ralls had a shot that was on target even if it was straight at their goalie.
Re: We have no threat up front
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:54 pm
davids wrote:mallo wrote::bluescarf:
Can't be right.
Ralls had a shot that was on target even if it was straight at their goalie.
And Fred did
Re: We have no threat up front
Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:41 pm
Surely Declan hitting the post would be a shot on target?
Re: We have no threat up front
Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:53 pm
Had several shots on target (at least 3) can think of so who did the stats are wrong
Re: We have no threat up front
Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:14 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Had several shots on target (at least 3) can think of so who did the stats are wrong
Agreed, Ralls, Freddie and Morrison had a header that was on target tipped over by the keeper. And that's without even thinking about it too hard !!
These stats are wrong !!
Re: We have no threat up front
Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:25 pm
Jestrix wrote:Surely Declan hitting the post would be a shot on target?
No still counts as off target as if it was on target it would be a goal
Re: We have no threat up front
Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:31 pm
davids wrote:Very slow and ponderous tonight as we were on Sunday.
Constant passing sideways and backwards without any creativity or penetration. First option for almost all players was to look backwards.
Completely devoid of ideas in the final third and lost count of the times we passed the ball along the back four, into midfield, back to the back four and as soon as we got bored we gave the ball away.
Six and a half hours now without a City player scoring a goal.
But we won!
Thanks Duffy!
Not often I agree with you but I think the last two home games we have been boring and awful