Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:55 pm
Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:59 pm
gwentbluebirds wrote:Scores 2 again tonight. I said months ago we should of signed him and I still would. He scores goals simple. .....
Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:17 pm
Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:23 pm
Double G wrote:how much would he cost now ?
would people want him here ? certainly again proving hes a goalscorer at that level and i personally wouldnt mind him here
Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:25 pm
wez1927 wrote:Double G wrote:how much would he cost now ?
would people want him here ? certainly again proving hes a goalscorer at that level and i personally wouldnt mind him here
I would have him and I think he's not guilty and been stitched up
Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:44 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Double G wrote:how much would he cost now ?
would people want him here ? certainly again proving hes a goalscorer at that level and i personally wouldnt mind him here
I would have him and I think he's not guilty and been stitched up
Wez, I agree![]()
![]()
Can you believe the last few months we've virtually agreed on everything
Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:35 pm
Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:53 am
Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:58 am
gwentbluebirds wrote:He's been cleared he's having a retrial. I would still have him here same as Chesterfield has taken a chance
Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:11 am
wez1927 wrote:Double G wrote:how much would he cost now ?
would people want him here ? certainly again proving hes a goalscorer at that level and i personally wouldnt mind him here
I would have him and I think he's not guilty and been stitched up
Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:39 am
Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:10 pm
Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:04 pm
Reza wrote:would take him in a heartbeat,showing hes to good for that level
Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:05 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:Very happy to see him doing well, contender for the Welsh squad.
Not going to happen until after his retrial guarantee that
Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:33 pm
Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:36 pm
Walesaway1958 wrote:When is his retrial ? how long will it take so his mind will not be on football for the trail period, he his putting himself in the shop window and if found not guilty a clamor of clubs will come in for him especially if he keeps this scoring record up
Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:39 pm
Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:23 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:for anyone saying that he is innocent, i suggest you read the full transcript of the appeal of the original trial: https://www.crimeline.info/uploads/case ... im2559.pdf
this was a complex case and one not capable of being grossly simplified as people on this thread have done. the reason for the original differing decisions becomes clearer from paragraph 19 onwards. i doubt you'll get that far though.
stating that macdonald was not guilty therefore evans must also not be neglects to consider the differing respective courses of communication between the victim and two accused, for instance.
it is, however, clear that quite a few people aren't even interested in finding out about the merits of the conviction, and are using this case to complain about wider societal issues like falsely crying rape.
Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:21 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:for anyone saying that he is innocent, i suggest you read the full transcript of the appeal of the original trial: https://www.crimeline.info/uploads/case ... im2559.pdf
this was a complex case and one not capable of being grossly simplified as people on this thread have done. the reason for the original differing decisions becomes clearer from paragraph 19 onwards. i doubt you'll get that far though.
stating that macdonald was not guilty therefore evans must also not be neglects to consider the differing respective courses of communication between the victim and two accused, for instance.
it is, however, clear that quite a few people aren't even interested in finding out about the merits of the conviction, and are using this case to complain about wider societal issues like falsely crying rape.