MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL (according to facebook apparently)
Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:42 pm
according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY 
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:30 pm
That reputable source Facebook...
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:45 pm
according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY SAYS DEREK ACCORAH. "THE SPIRITS TOLD ME SO IT MUST BE TRUE", ADDED THE LYING SCOUSE GOBSHITE.
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Sun Jul 31, 2016 5:54 pm
riley1951 wrote:according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY
Dear, oh dear! Have you seen the keepers Liverpool already have, including the recent signing of former Arsenal man, Alex Manninger??
A little research would have saved your embarrassment!
Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Fakebook!
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:05 pm
Sven wrote:riley1951 wrote:according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY
Dear, oh dear! Have you seen the keepers Liverpool already have, including the recent signing of former Arsenal man, Alex Manninger??
A little research would have saved your embarrassment!
Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Fakebook!
To be fair one of their keepers has just broken his hand and the Arsenal bloke's nearly 40 so it's not out of the realms of posibility.
Would still be a shock move though and a bit of a waste of money
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:20 pm
Aramore wrote:Sven wrote:riley1951 wrote:according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY
Dear, oh dear! Have you seen the keepers Liverpool already have, including the recent signing of former Arsenal man, Alex Manninger??
A little research would have saved your embarrassment!
Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Fakebook!
To be fair one of their keepers has just broken his hand and the Arsenal bloke's nearly 40 so it's not out of the realms of posibility.
Would still be a shock move though and a bit of a waste of money
Yes, I accept that and agree that it would be a strange move
The injury not good for Liverpool, as I know Klopp had high hopes for the injured keeper (name escapes me)
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:33 am
Sven wrote:riley1951 wrote:according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY
Dear, oh dear! Have you seen the keepers Liverpool already have, including the recent signing of former Arsenal man, Alex Manninger??
A little research would have saved your embarrassment!
Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Fakebook!
Mr Negative strikes again I give the fans a quote you come back with criticism , I assure you fellow Bluebird I am not embarrassed, a little research, as quoted by others, Manninger 40 , New guy broken his hand maybe you might have realised, why the rumour developed !!
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL (according to facebook apparently)
Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:56 am
Edited the title for you 
Re: MARSHALL TO LIVERPOOL
Mon Aug 01, 2016 11:03 am
riley1951 wrote:Sven wrote:riley1951 wrote:according TO FACEBOOK LIVERPOOL COULD BE AFTER MARSHY
Dear, oh dear! Have you seen the keepers Liverpool already have, including the recent signing of former Arsenal man, Alex Manninger??
A little research would have saved your embarrassment!
Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Fakebook!
Mr Negative strikes again I give the fans a quote you come back with criticism , I assure you fellow Bluebird I am not embarrassed, a little research, as quoted by others, Manninger 40 , New guy broken his hand maybe you might have realised, why the rumour developed !!
Quote: "Mr Negative strikes again" LOL
Hardly negative! I want and expect Marshall to stay and I simply laughed because you read something on Fakebook and decided to run with it when a little research even on this Forum would have told you that Marshall and his family are settled in Cardiff and he would be unlikely be interested in going to a club where he would almost certainly play second fiddle to two (out of three) other keepers when all are fit. His pride in playing for his homeland of Scotland means too much to him to do that!
And I don't believe you did it knowing that the other guy was injured or else you would have stated it at the time!
To be fair, it's the "again" bit that made me laugh most, as a quick check of your 37 posts (soon to be 38 I have no doubt
) show you to be a new member on this Forum and (to the best of my knowledge) you are not someone with whom I have engaged with previously during your short membership period on here Welcome to the Forum though, Alan. You'll soon learn everyone has an opinion and that is why the debate is usually so much fun!