Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:20 pm
Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:49 pm
Thu Jul 21, 2016 4:41 pm
Thu Jul 21, 2016 4:46 pm
Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:57 am
Sven wrote:Interesting, as I believe Moody was more the problem at the CCS than Malky was and didn't expect to see him back in football on 'trust' grounds alone!![]()
My understanding was that the FA decided they had no jurisdiction over the accusations rather than finding they "weren't guilty" (both admitted they had made a mistake) after they made a similar assessment on one of their own at the FA
Hopefully, a good sign for Malky who I'd like to see back in football; just not at the CCS!
Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:37 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:Sven wrote:Interesting, as I believe Moody was more the problem at the CCS than Malky was and didn't expect to see him back in football on 'trust' grounds alone!![]()
My understanding was that the FA decided they had no jurisdiction over the accusations rather than finding they "weren't guilty" (both admitted they had made a mistake) after they made a similar assessment on one of their own at the FA
Hopefully, a good sign for Malky who I'd like to see back in football; just not at the CCS!
They were both guilty, in private or not they had no respect for our players by referring to them as chinkies or blackies. Disgraceful that no action was taken but that's the FA for you...