Jazz Richards V Scott-Malone stick or twist?

Scott has faced heavy criticism here and Jazz has faced it at Fulham.

Malone has had more game time but Jazz looks a better player on paper and is Welsh. looking at this he has no significant weaknesses but it probably means very little.

Scott cant hold onto the ball well and is poor at tackling on here. Would you say that is fair?

A players game time depends very much on the Manager, the squad, and the situation. The key thing here is are we getting the better end of the deal?

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

I think they are both capable of having good games, but neither of them are consistent enough for me. Personally, I don't think there's a lot to choose between them.

It made me laugh that people said Jazz had a good Euro's. He was only on the pitch for 2 minutes!

I cant play football but im not a bad runner.I bet if I ran up and down the pitch for 2 minutes blocking people and making a nuicance of myself I could probably pass myself off as a profesional footballer. No offence to Jazz but I think Youtube videos are a safer bet than that!

jazz shows more future promise

Wez I got to say that I think that Trollope knows more about Jazz than anyone on this board, that is all I have to say

Wez I got to say that I think that Trollope knows more about Jazz than anyone on this board, that is all I have to say

And the people on this board know more about Scott Malone than Trollope does, thats all I have to say.