Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:18 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:27 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:48 pm
salopiancity wrote:Visas will be required probably but not for a couple of years.
Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:49 pm
BlueMagic wrote:Seems we tend to sign a lot of players from abroad and the eu, most recently lex immers saadi and zohore all came from european countrys.
I assume we could very well have targets lined up in the foreign market again but i was just wondering had the brexit completely put a stop to our transfer targets?
Anyone know how it works can we still sign players from abroad at this moment in time without the work permit stuff like signing say a south american player?
Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:54 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:39 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:28 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:17 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:32 pm
rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:00 am
wez1927 wrote:rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
whyou would we they need us more than we n3ed them we don't have to agree to an6thingcwe are a bigger fish than norway or Swiss
Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:12 am
ccfcsince62 wrote:wez1927 wrote:rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
whyou would we they need us more than we n3ed them we don't have to agree to an6thingcwe are a bigger fish than norway or Swiss
I don`t follow the logic of your argument Wez.
Exports from the UK to the EU represent a far higher percentage ohe UK`s total exports than the UK represents as a percentage of the EU`s total exports. So the EU is far more important to the UK than the UK is to the EU.
Also , I can tell you from personal business experience that the UK is only important to a number of investors from across the world , like US and Japanese companies ,because it gives them far easier EU market access. Even the grants available to attract such companies here (which are likely to dry up considerably in any case as Wales receives less money to offer out to inward investors) will not be enough to persuade them to continue to invest here - they will go direct to EU countries instead , and it has already started happening.
Mon Jun 27, 2016 1:46 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:wez1927 wrote:rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
whyou would we they need us more than we n3ed them we don't have to agree to an6thingcwe are a bigger fish than norway or Swiss
I don`t follow the logic of your argument Wez.
Exports from the UK to the EU represent a far higher percentage ohe UK`s total exports than the UK represents as a percentage of the EU`s total exports. So the EU is far more important to the UK than the UK is to the EU.
Also , I can tell you from personal business experience that the UK is only important to a number of investors from across the world , like US and Japanese companies ,because it gives them far easier EU market access. Even the grants available to attract such companies here (which are likely to dry up considerably in any case as Wales receives less money to offer out to inward investors) will not be enough to persuade them to continue to invest here - they will go direct to EU countries instead , and it has already started happening.
That was happening well before the EU referendum and would have continued even if we had voted in. The UK represents 16% of all EU worldwide exports which represents their biggest overseas market and hardly something they would want to lose or upset.
Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:30 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:wez1927 wrote:rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
whyou would we they need us more than we n3ed them we don't have to agree to an6thingcwe are a bigger fish than norway or Swiss
I don`t follow the logic of your argument Wez.
Exports from the UK to the EU represent a far higher percentage ohe UK`s total exports than the UK represents as a percentage of the EU`s total exports. So the EU is far more important to the UK than the UK is to the EU.
Also , I can tell you from personal business experience that the UK is only important to a number of investors from across the world , like US and Japanese companies ,because it gives them far easier EU market access. Even the grants available to attract such companies here (which are likely to dry up considerably in any case as Wales receives less money to offer out to inward investors) will not be enough to persuade them to continue to invest here - they will go direct to EU countries instead , and it has already started happening.
That was happening well before the EU referendum and would have continued even if we had voted in. The UK represents 16% of all EU worldwide exports which represents their biggest overseas market and hardly something they would want to lose or upset.
Whilst the UK is an important export market for the rest of the EU , as you correctly state it is only 16% of their total export market , whileas approximately one half of all UK exports are to the EU. That was the point I was making , that the EU as a market is far more important to the UK than vice versa.
More worrying to me is the negative impact Brexit is going to have on attracting inward investment to Wales. I have personal experience of one such project that would have created many jobs that is now not going to happen. I know Brexit will actually take some time to implement , but big business tends to think medium to long term and many potential inward investing companies are now going to choose somewhere that is firmly within the EU internal market rather than the UK which is almost certainly going to be outside it within a few years. No one is going to invest here , then move their operations again in the short to medium term.
Brexit has happened and , in the spirit of democracy , must be accepted by those like myself that voted to remain within the EU . However , I cannot believe that some areas in Wales that will suffer considerable financial loss as a result of voting out supported leaving. In my view , it was a combination of the Remain campaign being so poorly run (or undermined by the likes of Jeremy Corbyn) and not enough people thinking through the consequences of their vote.
I am also concerned that both the Conservative and Labour parties are in a state of disarray. This both leaves no-one to oversee and negotiate the best exit terms and leaves a political vacuum for the like of the odious and racist UKIP party to step into (my opinion obviously of their policies and plans).Whoever gets into a position of power in Westminster will not be rushing to focus on replacing what Wales will lose financially from Brexit as all will have a "Little Englander" attitude. The Conservatives don`t care about Wales as they get hardly any votes here and Labour continue to believe (I think increasingly over optimistically) that they are still living in an era where putting a Labour Party rosette on a donkey would still get it elected to Parliament in Wales.
Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:07 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:49 pm
Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:26 pm
wez1927 wrote:rontom wrote:Do not think it will make any difference from what it is now.
If we want a trade agreement with the EU then we have to agree to allow EU members to work here.
whyou would we they need us more than we n3ed them we don't have to agree to an6thingcwe are a bigger fish than norway or Swiss