Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:12 pm
Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:24 pm
Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:31 pm
oohahhPaulMillar wrote:Obviously had no intentionna of staying as head of football so why take the job in the first place!!!!
Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:47 pm
agree with you spot onccfcsince62 wrote:oohahhPaulMillar wrote:Obviously had no intentionna of staying as head of football so why take the job in the first place!!!!
Because it enabled him to save face rather than it be described as a straight forward sacking and also gave him income until the new job came along. It was always going to be a short term appointment but you can hardly blame him for not turning down the money as most people would in his position.
Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:02 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:oohahhPaulMillar wrote:Obviously had no intentionna of staying as head of football so why take the job in the first place!!!!
Because it enabled him to save face rather than it be described as a straight forward sacking and also gave him income until the new job came along. It was always going to be a short term appointment but you can hardly blame him for not turning down the money as most people would in his position.
Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:01 am
Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:32 am
ashi83 wrote:Best of luck to him.
Left us in a better position than he found us. Didn't bring the success we had hoped, but was by no means a bad appointment under the circumstances.
I think it was quite respectful and admirable of Tan to give him that platform as a 'Thanks but no thanks' rather than an ungracious firing.
Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:33 pm
lathamgaffney wrote:ashi83 wrote:Best of luck to him.
Left us in a better position than he found us. Didn't bring the success we had hoped, but was by no means a bad appointment under the circumstances.
I think it was quite respectful and admirable of Tan to give him that platform as a 'Thanks but no thanks' rather than an ungracious firing.
Slade stabilised a sinking ship. Can't fault him at all for that.![]()
My only concern is why Trollope? If we were going to appoint him, we may as well stuck with Slade. Apparently many more players to leave and 4 new additions. I can only see Trollope cutting more wages, making some profit for the club and another mid-table Championship campaign.
Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:48 pm
lathamgaffney wrote:ashi83 wrote:Best of luck to him.
Left us in a better position than he found us. Didn't bring the success we had hoped, but was by no means a bad appointment under the circumstances.
I think it was quite respectful and admirable of Tan to give him that platform as a 'Thanks but no thanks' rather than an ungracious firing.
Slade stabilised a sinking ship. Can't fault him at all for that.![]()
My only concern is why Trollope? If we were going to appoint him, we may as well stuck with Slade. Apparently many more players to leave and 4 new additions. I can only see Trollope cutting more wages, making some profit for the club and another mid-table Championship campaign.
Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:50 pm