A new low for WOL

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

Mostly half the shit that journos come out with on there and now this.

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

Mostly half the shit that journos come out with on there and now this.

I genuinely don't understand. I guess they have their reasons and you're not compelled to go on there if you don't like or agree with what they write, so I guess you go on there because you want to and feel they have something to offer?

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

Mostly half the shit that journos come out with on there and now this.

I genuinely don't understand. I guess they have their reasons and you're not compelled to go on there if you don't like or agree with what they write, so I guess you go on there because you want to and feel they have something to offer?

Mostly for Blakey's bootroom that's why I go on there.

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

Mostly half the shit that journos come out with on there and now this.

I genuinely don't understand. I guess they have their reasons and you're not compelled to go on there if you don't like or agree with what they write, so I guess you go on there because you want to and feel they have something to offer?

Mostly for Blakey's bootroom that's why I go on there.

Fair enough

Never listened to that (not a Blake 'the pundit' fan) and can see the transcript on here anyway but WOL have their systems and I guess we have a choice to accept or otherwise

I now have to answer questions to just access an article.

Why is that a "new low"?

Mostly half the shit that journos come out with on there and now this.

I genuinely don't understand. I guess they have their reasons and you're not compelled to go on there if you don't like or agree with what they write, so I guess you go on there because you want to and feel they have something to offer?

Mostly for Blakey's bootroom that's why I go on there.

Fair enough

Never listened to that (not a Blake 'the pundit' fan) and can see the transcript on here anyway but WOL have their systems and I guess we have a choice to accept or otherwise

Very unnecessary if you ask me.

I've stopped reading WOL, the majority of there articles are either repetitive, negative or in Chris wathans case Condescending. And don't even get me started on Steve tucker...

At least I can respect blakeys opinion as a former player, whether I agree or not...