Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:25 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:37 pm
BlueMagic wrote:Slade likes him obviously in his new role. Hes done a job for us and scored a few goals whilst working hard so cant fault him on that.
But for me he isnt the answer upfront for any team hoping to get promoted to the premier league.
From watching him last night he dosent get himself in the box enough and lacks that killer instinct in and around the penalty area, also he dosent seem to be much of an outlet up there not offering himself and is too weak at times imo, an out an out experienced striker is used to playing with his back to goal and off defenders shoulders aswell and just generally know the striker role better, pilkington would be way behind a natural striker in some ways imo and couldnt just pick stuff up over a few games or a season that an out an out striker has been doing years and years.
For me saadi or zahore could be better options for us upfront and should be given a real chance.
Do people think pilkington is the answer up front yes or no????
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:27 pm
llan bluebird wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Slade likes him obviously in his new role. Hes done a job for us and scored a few goals whilst working hard so cant fault him on that.
But for me he isnt the answer upfront for any team hoping to get promoted to the premier league.
From watching him last night he dosent get himself in the box enough and lacks that killer instinct in and around the penalty area, also he dosent seem to be much of an outlet up there not offering himself and is too weak at times imo, an out an out experienced striker is used to playing with his back to goal and off defenders shoulders aswell and just generally know the striker role better, pilkington would be way behind a natural striker in some ways imo and couldnt just pick stuff up over a few games or a season that an out an out striker has been doing years and years.
For me saadi or zahore could be better options for us upfront and should be given a real chance.
Do people think pilkington is the answer up front yes or no????
Every time Zahore plays i realise that Slade is playing the fluid football under duress. He can't wait to get a big lump on and launch it.
Saadi can't be up to much if Zahore is ahead of him in the pecking order.
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:30 pm
BlueMagic wrote:Slade likes him obviously in his new role. Hes done a job for us and scored a few goals whilst working hard so cant fault him on that.
But for me he isnt the answer upfront for any team hoping to get promoted to the premier league.
From watching him last night he dosent get himself in the box enough and lacks that killer instinct in and around the penalty area, also he dosent seem to be much of an outlet up there not offering himself and is too weak at times imo, an out an out experienced striker is used to playing with his back to goal and off defenders shoulders aswell and just generally know the striker role better, pilkington would be way behind a natural striker in some ways imo and couldnt just pick stuff up over a few games or a season that an out an out striker has been doing years and years.
For me saadi or zahore could be better options for us upfront and should be given a real chance.
Do people think pilkington is the answer up front yes or no????
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:35 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:39 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:47 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:49 pm
BrightBlueFuture wrote:He's very good as a striker and is the best we have at the moment.
He created a few openings for himself last night but Silvestri had a blinder and the shots Pilks did have which usually would've deflected to someone else, somehow just stuck to his body...
For me he's as close to Fraizer Campbell as we've had since he's left.
Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:50 pm
TBlue wrote:For me Pilkington has been brilliant. His movement is outstanding and could have got in behind their defence last night many times. The problem last night was we insisted several times on aiming it to his head and Bamba was winning every ball. We weren't using him to his strength. There was one moment in the second half where no one but the ball into the front post and Pilks picked it up and cut it back around the defender to make it one on one with the keeper. The only thing that let him down was his finish, I can't help but think a out and out striker would have tucked that away.
Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:15 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:20 pm
Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:42 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:26 pm
llan bluebird wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
He could have scored two easy chances, but never.
Thu Mar 10, 2016 12:09 am
paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:47 am
paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
Thu Mar 10, 2016 9:15 am
Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:22 am
paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:38 am
Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:51 am
SWilliams wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Am i mad guys? Because i thought zohore looked dangerous when he came on! Could quite easily have scored twice.
Now it might just be because we need to get the ball into the box, maybe if given a start he wouldnt be able to affect the game, but i was more optimistic after last night.
Also zohore instead of saadi was 100% the right call last night
You have every right to your opinion. For me, Zohore doesn't look particularly impressive and I'm not confident that he will add anything to the team. That said, the lad has only had very limited game time and he should possibly be given a start. To get a better opinion of him.
My opinion is that although Saadi has also had even more limited time (only about 10 mins!), he did look like he had something about him. I would bring him on at some point on Saturday.
Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:24 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:36 pm
BlueMagic wrote:How did pilkington do yesterday?